ΕυρωπαϊκόΚοινοβούλιοHighlights - Vote on the AFCO draft opinion on the Draft general budget of the EU for 2022 - Committee on Constitutional Affairs31/08/2021
During its meeting of 2 September 2021, AFCO will vote on the amendments and final text of its draft opinion on the Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2022 - General Introduction - Total expenditure - General statement of revenue - Statement of revenue and expenditure by section. The Rapporteur for this draft opinion is Mr. Antonio Tajani (PPE).
AFCO's draft opinion for the report of the Committee on Budgets on next year's EU budget emphasizes the need for the allocation of proper financial means for financing AFCO's political priorities, like communication with citizens; roll-out of the Conference on the Future of Europe; programmes f
Latest news - Next AFCO Committee Meeting on 30 September 2021 - Committee on Constitutional Affairs02/09/2021
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the President of the European Parliament has established a number of measures to contain the spread of the virus and to safeguard Parliament's core activities. The current precautionary measures do not affect work on legislative priorities. Core activities are maintained to ensure the smooth running of the institution's legislative, budgetary, and scrutiny functions. The meetings allow for remote participation in a virtual environment.
The next AFCO committee meeting is scheduled for 30 September 2021 at 9:00 - 12:00 and 13:45 - 16:45.
The meeting will be held in Brussels and via video-conference, allowing Members to view and listen to proceedings, ask for the floor, and i
Newsletters - Meeting 2 September 2021 - Committee on Constitutional Affairs02/09/2021
Newsletter - Issue 34Highlights - Exchange of views on women’s and girls’ rights in Afghanistan - 06.09.21 - Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality02/09/2021
On 6 September 2021, Members of the Committee Women's Rights and Gender Equality and Subcommittee on Human Rights will hold an exchange of views on women’s and girls’ rights in Afghanistan. The debate will focus on the risks faced by women and girls under Taliban, prospects for the future, and the EU's activities to support women and girls. The meeting will be organised in association with the Delegation for relations with Afghanistan.
Draft agenda and meeting documentsSource :
© European UnionLatest news - Next FEMM committee meeting - 6 September 2021 - Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality02/09/2021
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the President of the European Parliament has established a number of measures to contain the spread of the virus and to safeguard Parliament's core activities. The current precautionary measures do not affect work on legislative priorities.Core activities are maintained to ensure the smooth running of the institution's legislative, budgetary, and scrutiny functions. The meetings allow for remote participation in a virtual environment.
Following these decisions, the next meeting will take place on:
6 September
13.45-14.00 FEMM
<
Highlights - Exchange of views with EIGE Experts - Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality02/09/2021
At the meeting on 31 August 2021, the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality held an exchange of views with Parliament's experts in EIGE's Experts' Forum: members Mr Mikael Gustafsson and Ms Edit Bauer and alternate member Ms Gotelind Alber. The mandate of the current members of the EIGE's Experts' Forum is about to expire on 30 November 2021 and the FEMM Committee invited Parliament's experts to present their work in this mandate of the Forum.
Parliament's experts informed Members about topics of concern, such a gender-based violence, about meetings that took place and studies that were prepared. They also shared their concern about the lack of sufficient and up to date data, which is vital to the work of EIGE. The
Highlights - The EU Gender Action Plan (GAP) III - committees debate - Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality02/09/2021
The Committees on Development and on Women's Rights and Gender Equality will discuss joint draft report on the EU Gender Action Plan (GAP) III on 6 September. Rapporteur is Ms Chrysoula Zacharopoulou’s.
The report calls for more effective EU commitment and examines GAP III's proposed actions and targets regarding eliminating gender violence, ensuring access to healthcare for women, promoting economic and social equality, encouraging participation and leadership by women, involving women in peacebuilding and security, and building a green and digital society.
Highlights - FEMM budgetary opinion 2022 – vote - 06.09.21 - Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality02/09/2021
In her draft opinion the rapporteur, Ms Samira Rafaela (Renew, FR), reaffirms the need to implement gender mainstreaming and gender budgeting throughout all the phases of the budgetary procedure. She also calls on the Commission to increase the budget of the EIGE and to assign an independent budget line to the objective in the CERV Programme dedicated to promoting gender equality and stresses the importance of increasing resources for the Daphne strand.
The rapporteur finally calls for the EU budget to encourage women's participation and interest in the digital economy and STEM sectors. 74 amendments and 8 compromises have been tabled.
Άρθρο - Τι είναι το Erasmus+; (βίντεο)02/09/2021
Μάθετε περισσότερα για το Erasmus+, το εμβληματικό πρόγραμμα της ΕΕ για την εκπαίδευση, την κατάρτιση, τη νεολαία και τον αθλητισμό.
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Εν συντομία - Support for the EU fishing sector through the Brexit Adjustment Reserve - 02-09-202101/09/2021
The United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union has had a significant impact on several sectors, including EU fisheries, which face a 25 % reduction of their catch value in UK waters. To mitigate the short-term impact on the worst affected countries and sectors, the Commission proposed a €5 billion fund, the Brexit adjustment reserve. In a political agreement on the proposal, now to be formally confirmed by both, the co legislators included Parliament’s proposal to earmark a minimum level of support for the fisheries sector, in particular small-scale coastal fisheries that depend on fishing activities in UK waters.
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Briefing - Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces - 02-09-202101/09/2021
This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
onstitutional Affairs at the request of the JURI and PETI Committees, analyses the use of biometric techniques from an ethical and legal perspective. Biometric techniques raise a number of specific ethical issues, as an individual cannot easily change biometric features, and as these techniques tend to intrude into the human body and ultimately the human self. Further issues are more generally associated with large-scale surveillance, algorithmic decision making, or profiling. The study analyses different types of biometric techniques and draws conclusions for EU legislation
Πηγή :
© Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, 2021 - EK
Θάνος Πλεύρης: Θέλουμε να πείσουμε το προσωπικό του ΕΣΥ να εμβολιαστεί – Τι αναφέρθηκε στην τελετή παράδοσης
Ανασχηματισμός: Νέος υπουργός Υγείας ο Θάνος Πλεύρης
ΕΟΦ: Σε διαβούλευση οι τιμές γενοσήμων
Ποιες νέες κατηγορίες εργαζομένων υποχρεούνται να εμβολιαστούν
ΙΣΑ: Kαλεί φορείς ΠΦΥ να παραλάβουν το Ειδικό Σήμα Βεβαίωσης Εμβολιασμού
ΡευΜΑζήν: Bραβείο για την Καλύτερη Καμπάνια Επικοινωνίας & Ενημέρωσης Κοινού Συλλόγου Ασθενών
