Today, the Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional agreement on simplifying rules related to the classification, packaging, and labelling of chemicals, cosmetics products and fertilising products. Those provisions are the remaining part of the so-called ‘Omnibus VI’ package, which simplifies rules in the field of chemical products, while maintaining a high level of protection for consumers and the environment. “Today, the Cyprus presidency delivers another concrete result under the ‘One Europe, One Market’ roadmap and the simplification agenda, ahead of the forthcoming Leaders’ stocktaking. The agreement reduces unnecessary administrative burdens, supports innovation and circularity, and maintains high standards of consumer and environmental protection, delivering tangible benefits for both the chemicals industry and our citizens across Europe.” | | — Marilena Raouna, Deputy Minister for European affairs of the Republic of Cyprus |
The deal follows the previous agreement between the co-legislators on the ‘stop-the-clock’ mechanism which postponed to 1 January 2028 the date of entry into application of the revised regulation on classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals (CLP regulation). Today’s provisional agreement extends this date to 1 January 2030 to align the date of application on all three regulations, which modify three pieces of EU’s chemical legislation: - the CLP regulation, which was revised in 2024
- the 2009 cosmetic products regulation, and
- the 2019 fertilising products regulation
The targeted amendments aim to address the urgent issues raised by stakeholders which create administrative burdens for enterprises, notably by reducing reporting obligations arising from these three major pieces of EU legislation, while ensuring the same level of protection of human health and the environment. In view of its significant implications for suppliers and European companies, the co-legislators have treated these proposals with utmost priority aiming to provide EU companies with the necessary legal certainty on their obligations. Main amendments introduced by the co-legislatorsThe co-legislators maintained the general scope of the Commission proposal when it comes to simplifying the formatting requirements for labels, advertisements, and distance sales of chemicals in the CLP Regulation. The text retains the ‘digital by default’ approach as a common element of simplification with the co-legislators consistently focusing on removing duplication of requirements and streamlining the timelines. The provisional agreement is more protective to consumers concerning the use of nanomaterials and potential hazardous substances in cosmetic products, which adds complexity to the agreed text. On fertiliser products, micro-organisms require registration for up to 10 tonnes of annual quantities (the so-called ‘REACH+’ provision). CLP regulationIn terms of readability of labels, the co-legislators agreed on minimum font sizes for the labelling of products aimed at the general public but not to businesses, applying to hazardous substances covered by the CLP regulation. The agreement also includes specific labelling derogations for small packaging that could be applicable to printer ink cartridges, among others. The provisional agreement offers a general derogation for digital barcode for small, inner packaging containers, whereas all information is provided on the outer packaging. One of the most important elements in the CLP regulation concerns the transitional period for relabelling obligations, on which the co-legislators found a compromise solution of 15 months. Cosmetic products regulationOn the transitional periods for phasing out Carcinogenic, Mutagenic or Reprotoxic (CMR) substances, a three-tier system was agreed by the co-legislators with different deadlines for three cases: (i) substances for which no derogation is requested; (ii) substances for which a derogation is denied on safety grounds; and (iii) substances for which a derogation request is denied because the substance is deemed safe for use in cosmetics, but for which there are alternatives. Furthermore, in an effort to strike the right balance for cosmetic businesses when looking for alternative substances, the provisional agreement invites the Commission to publish guidance on the definitions and use of such alternative substances Finally, in response to concerns regarding the protection of human health and the environment, the provisional agreement preserves the Council mandate about extensive notification for nanomaterials in cosmetic products, which shall be sent prior to the cosmetic product being placed on the market. Fertilising products regulationCreating a new, open-ended Component Material Category (CMC) for fertilisers defined by general criteria and methodology is critical to accelerate agricultural innovation, support circular economy objectives and eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks for next-generation products. With this in mind, the co-legislators agreed to task the Commission to try creating such a category. The Commission had tried numerous times before but without success. In case the Commission would not be able to come up with such a category, it would need to draft a report addressed to the co-legislators setting out the reasons why such as category could not be created. Moreover, in view of the complex and volatile geopolitical developments, fertilisers have become a serious element for the EU’s resilience. Therefore, it was agreed that the Commission will periodically review the CMC requirements, and that the first review shall consider the requirements applicable for nutrient polymers covered by the so-called CMC 8 (‘Nutrient polymers with more than one function’), which are key synthetic or chemically modified materials designed to slowly control the release of nutrients to plants. To address concerns on potential environmental risks from new micro-organisms, the provisional agreement further clarifies the role of accredited notified bodies. For assessing criteria and methodologies, the inclusion of scientific bodies, either the Joint Research Centre (JRC) or the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), has been added. The provisional agreement also re-introduces a REACH registration obligation for substances subject to harmonised classification for certain particularly harmful substances but only above a threshold of 10 tonnes per year. Next stepsThe provisional agreement must now be endorsed by the Council and the European Parliament before being submitted for a legal/linguistic revision in view of its formal adoption by the co-legislators in the coming months. The co-legislators will work towards formally adopting this Omnibus as soon as possible, in the course of 2026. BackgroundIn October 2024, the European Council called on all EU institutions, member states and stakeholders, as a matter of priority, to take work forward, notably in response to the challenges identified in the reports by Enrico Letta (‘Much more than a market’) and Mario Draghi (‘The future of European competitiveness’). The Budapest declaration of 8 November 2024 subsequently called for ‘launching a simplification revolution’, by ensuring a clear, simple and smart regulatory framework for businesses and drastically reducing administrative, regulatory and reporting burdens, in particular for SMEs. Between 26 February and 9 July 2025, as a follow-up to EU leaders’ call, the Commission put forward six ‘Omnibus’ packages, aiming to simplify existing legislation on sustainability, investment, agriculture, small and mid-caps, digitalisation and common specifications, defence readiness and chemical products.
|