| ● Council of the EU | | | 13/06/2025 12:35 | Press release | | | | | Today, the Council agreed on the EU’s priorities for fighting serious and organised crime in the next 4 years ( 2026-2029). These will be implemented by means of the EU’s crime-fighting framework, the European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats (EMPACT), which brings together member states, EU and international actors. “Keeping citizens safe is one of the cardinal role of any democratic state. At EU level, we are committed to fighting organised crime so our citizens can live in an area of freedom and security. EMPACT is a key tool to make this objective a reality.” | | — Tomasz Siemoniak, Polish Minister of the Interior and Administration |
EMPACT tackles the biggest threats posed by serious and organised crime in the EU in a coordinated manner. It brings together stakeholders from different fields, such as law enforcement, customs, judicial authorities, third countries and the private sector, to fight crime together including through prevention and capacity building. EU crime priorities 2026-2029The Council identified the following seven EU crime priorities for the EMPACT cycle 2026-2029: - Identifying and disrupting the most threatening criminal networks and individuals
- Tackling the fastest growing crimes in the online sphere: cyber-attacks, online child sexual exploitation and online fraud schemes
- Fighting drug trafficking
- Tackling migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings
- Targeting firearms and explosives crime
- Disrupting networks involved in environmental crimes
- Fighting economic and financial crimes such as VAT fraud and intellectual property crime
The priorities take into account that serious and organised crime is progressively destablising our societies (e.g. by spreading violence and corruption), it is increasingly happening online and is strongly accelerated by artificial intelligence and other new technologies. Enhancement of EMPACTThe EMPACT mechanism fosters multiagency, multi-actor, cross-border, innovative and structured cooperation and offers an unique platform that facilitates connections and provides financial support for member states. Therefore it is critical to overcome persistent issues (e.g. related to funding, commitment of EMPACT actors) and to allow EMPACT to achieve and exploit its full potential. The Council urges all involved stakeholders to take action to ensure EMPACT moves to the next level. FundingThe success of EMPACT depends on sufficient and sustainable funding. With that in mind, the Council calls on the Commission to propose increased allocation for EMPACT in the EU budget, including through a higher EU contribution to Europol. Next stepsThe specific implementation of these crime-fighting priorities will happen on the basis of operational action plans (OAPs). All concerned services and stakeholders, at national and EU level, are called upon to allocate resources to carry out the operational actions under the OAPs. BackgroundEMPACT was established in 2010 to tackle the most important threats posed by serious and organised international crime affecting the EU. EMPACT provides a framework that brings together the law enforcement authorities of the member states, Europol, other EU agencies and bodies, as well as a wide range of multi-disciplinary partners to fight serious and organised crime more effectively. EMPACT translates strategic objectives at European level into concrete operational actions. EMPACT strengthens cooperation between police, border and coast guards, customs, judicial, administrative and tax authorities as well as EU institutions, bodies, agencies and relevant EU networks. It also involves non-EU countries, international organisations, as well as the private sector, where relevant. EMPACT works in four-year cycles. Each cycle starts with the EU Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (EU SOCTA), prepared by Europol, which highlights the most pressing threats, and serves as an input for the Council conclusions that define the EU’s crime priorities for the new cycle. In 2024, EMPACT actions led to over 12 000 arrests and seizures of property and goods worth EUR 1 billion. |
| ● Council of the EU | | | 13/06/2025 12:10 | Press release | | | | | Today, member states' representatives (Coreper) endorsed the Council's negotiating mandate on rules to improve the quality and availability of forest reproductive material (FRM). The regulation seeks to support the innovation and competitiveness of the EU seed sector, while addressing sustainability, biodiversity and climate-related challenges. Main elements of the proposalThe FRM proposal maintains the existing principles of approval of parent trees ('basic material') and certification of harvested FRM before it is placed on the market. Under the proposed framework, member states would be required to enter the basic material approved on their territory into national registers, with the Commission publishing an EU-wide list to ensure full traceability. In line with the proposal, there would be a stronger focus on assessing the sustainability features of parent trees. In practice, parent trees would undergo an assessment to evaluate traits that contribute to forest resilience, such as tolerance to pests or better adaptation to local climate conditions. Finally, the proposal places a stronger emphasis on innovative production processes, digital tools and biomolecular techniques. Main changes agreed by the CouncilThe Council welcomes the overall goals of the proposal, but introduces a series of changes to improve the text. Official controlsCurrently, the number and type of controls applied to FRM vary significantly between member states. In an attempt to harmonise the rules, the Commission proposed extending the so-called official controls regulation (2017/625) to cover FRM. The Council acknowledges the need for official controls to be applied consistently across member states. However, due to the specificities of forest reproductive material, as well as to reduce the administrative and financial impact, the Council has agreed that the FRM sector cannot fall under the scope of the official controls regulation. As a result, in its negotiating mandate, the Council agrees that the new FRM regulation should include a number of provisions on controls, safeguarding the quality and traceability of FRM. In particular, it would contain rules for designating competent control authorities, on their legal powers and on financial resources, among other provisions. These provisions would be supplemented by certain elements from the official controls regulation, to ensure the consistent application of official controls across member states. Key elements of the official controls regulation that would apply to the FRM sector include rules on official controls of FRM entering the EU, the delegation of certain tasks of the competent authorities, confidentiality obligations for competent control authorities, and training of staff. This approach will create synergies with official control systems for similar sectors, for instance for plants. National contingency plansThe Commission proposed the introduction of national contingency plans to help ensure a sufficient supply of FRM, for instance to contribute to the reforestation of areas affected by extreme weather events. This would help improve the resilience of forest ecosystems. In order to reduce the administrative burden for the competent authorities, the Council agreed that these national contingency plans should be voluntary. The Council also agrees that the plans should contain simplified requirements. List of tree speciesTo further reduce the administrative burden for both competent authorities and operators, the list of tree species that the regulation covers has been streamlined. Member states will be able to apply more or less stringent measures to the tree species that are not listed in the annex. Obligations for professional operatorsThe Council's negotiating mandate also further specifies rules on record-keeping and concerning the obligations that operators have. In particular, professional operators will have to be included in a register. Furthermore, they will have to ensure the traceability and identification of FRM at all stages of production and marketing and provide the user with comprehensive information about the FRM via a document. Next stepsWith today's agreement, the Council presidency is ready to start negotiations with the European Parliament on the final text of the regulation. BackgroundFRM refers to seeds, plants and parts of plants, and it is used for the creation of new forests, reforestation, and other types of tree planting for different purposes, including biodiversity conservation, climate adaptation, climate mitigation and the conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources. Council directive 1999/105/EC sets out rules on the production and marketing of FRM. Since its adoption, several developments in science and technology have taken place. The Commission submitted a proposal in July 2023 which aims to ensure that high-quality FRM is available and that the sector maintains its competitiveness. The FRM regulation will also contribute to the EU target of planting at least three billion additional trees by 2030 under the biodiversity strategy, as well as to the development of the bioeconomy. In parallel, the Commission also proposed new rules for the production and marketing of plant reproductive material. |
|
| ● Eurogroup | | | 13/06/2025 09:32 | Press release | | | | | We welcome Belgium’s submission of its draft budgetary plan (DBP) for 2025 on 30 April 2025, following the submission of its medium-term fiscal structural plan on 18 March 2025, as well as the Commission Opinion on the DBP, published on 4 June 2025. The Council is currently considering the Commission recommendation for the endorsement of Belgium’s medium-term fiscal structural plan, the Commission recommendation for a revised corrective path under the Excessive Deficit Procedure, and the Commission recommendation for the activation of the national escape clause, at the request of Belgium. We agree with the Commission assessment that Belgium’s DBP for 2025 is considered to be in line with the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact, subject to the activation by the Council of the national escape clause to accommodate higher defence spending. While the projected net expenditure growth in 2025 exceeds the ceiling set in Belgium’s medium-term fiscal structural plan, it remains within the flexibility provided by the national escape clause, based on the Commission forecast. We invite Belgium to stand ready to take action as necessary in line with the risks outlined in the Commission assessment and to deliver on its fiscal commitments. The Eurogroup will continue to closely monitor economic and fiscal developments regularly and reinforce its policy coordination. |
|
| ● Council of the EU | | | 12/06/2025 21:13 | Press release | | | | | At the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the signing of the Schengen Agreement, the Council approved a Schengen Declaration to renew its commitment to the Schengen area and to underline the importance of Schengen for the European cooperation and integration. “We have come together on the 40th anniversary of the signing of the Schengen Agreement to highlight our common commitment to Europe's security, building resilience and readiness for today’s challenges. Guided by our shared values, we pledge to continue investing in the common area without internal borders, ensuring strong management of our external borders, a more effective fight against illegal migration and a high level of internal security. We are determined to work together and foster mutual trust, so that present and future generations of Europeans can continue to enjoy the benefits of the Schengen area.” | | — Tomasz Siemoniak, Polish Minister of the Interior and Administration |
The world’s largest area of free movementSchengen has become the largest area of free movement which offers seamless mobility for more than 450 million Europeans. Two million people commute daily across internal borders. Schengen facilitates intra-EU trade which exceeded € 4 100 billion in 2024. Hundreds of millions of people legally cross the EU’s external borders every year. This makes the Schengen area the world’s most visited destination, attracting 40 % of international tourism. Seven commitments to preserve and consolidate SchengenIn times of geopolitical instability and an evolving security landscape the EU is committed to continuing to invest in a common area without internal borders, ensuring strong external border management and a high degree of internal security. Through seven commitments the Council will preserve and consolidate the functioning of the Schengen area. The commitments include: - To promote and protect the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights in a single area of freedom, security and justice
- To defend the unfettered free movement of persons by ensuring that the reintroduction of internal border controls remains a measure of last resort and to take all appropriate measures with respect to external border management, secondary movements, migration, the return of those illegally staying as well as the prevention and combating of off-line and on-line cross border crime, terrorism, as well as emerging threats such as hybrid threats or cybercrime
- To develop and deepen law enforcement and interagency cooperation and to enhance the development and use of large-scale IT systems to ensure Schengen remains the backbone of European security cooperation that contributes to the security of its citizens
- To refuse entry and prevent unauthorised border crossings to those who have no right to enter, and return those who have no right to stay, in a humane and dignified manner
- To reinforce the external dimension of Schengen including through an effective visa policy, border management and effective cooperation with third countries on return and readmission
- To uphold a high level of mutual trust between member states and to address jointly the challenges faced by the Schengen area
- To invest in a solid and well-functioning Schengen – through appropriate funding, human-centred innovation and new technologies, proactive action
BackgroundOn 14 June 1985, five countries – Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands – signed the Schengen Agreement. The goal was to gradually remove controls at the internal borders and to allow freedom of movement for their citizens. The practical arrangements for abolishing border controls – and strengthening the protection of the common external borders – were set out in the Schengen Convention from 1990. The Convention entered into force in 1995 and led to the actual removal of border controls between the five countries – as well as Spain and Portugal who had joined in the meantime. Since then the Schengen area without controls at internal borders has only grown and now consists of 29 countries. All EU member states except for Cyprus and Ireland plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. |
|
| ● Council of the EU | | | 12/06/2025 18:56 | Meetings | | | | | At their meeting in Luxembourg, ministers of justice agreed their positions on a directive harmonising national insolvency laws and on a regulation about the protection of adults in need of support. |
|
| ● Council of the EU | | | 12/06/2025 19:16 | Press release | | | | | The Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional deal on the OSOA (one substance one assessment) package, which aims to streamline assessments of chemicals across relevant EU legislation, strengthen the knowledge base on chemicals, and ensure early detection and action on emerging chemical risks. The package contains three proposals: a directive concerning the re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks, a regulation aimed at enhancing cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals, and a regulation establishing a common data platform on chemicals. The co-legislators maintain the objectives of the legislative package but enlarge the information available in the common platform (i.e. to include scientific data submitted voluntarily), clarify how medical data should be treated, and ensure that the content of the platform is publicly available, in line with EU legislation on access to information. Gathering data just onceThe OSOA package creates a common platform that integrates existing databases and offers a 'one-stop shop' for chemical data from EU agencies and the Commission. It enables knowledge sharing from one legislative area to another and mandates the systematic collection of human biomonitoring data to inform policymakers about chemical exposure levels. A monitoring and outlook framework will detect chemical risks early, support fast regulatory responses, and track impacts through an early warning system and indicators. It also empowers the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to generate data when needed and ensures transparency of scientific studies Main elements of the agreementThe deal reached today makes sure that over time the common data platform to be hosted by ECHA should provide access to all chemicals data generated or submitted as part of the implementation of about 70 pieces of EU legislation. The agreement requires ECHA to create and manage a database, inside the common data platform, that lists alternatives to substances of concern (chemicals that presents a potential risk to human health or the environment). This database should include alternative technologies and materials that do not require such substances of concern. The agreement specifically supports the voluntary submission of scientific data to be included in the platform. Data on medicinal productsThe deal reached today considers that certain categories of newly generated data relating to chemical substances present in medicinal products from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) must be addressed as well. The Commission will carry out an assessment to analyse whether in the future it is appropriate to include in the platform further categories of chemicals data related to medicinal products (for instance, other elements than active substances, substances that are now considered non-relevant, or data held by national agencies). The co-legislators also agreed that legacy data from EMA (i.e. data generated and submitted before the entry into force of the regulation) will be gradually integrated into the platform, starting six years after the regulation enters into force. Public accessThe co-legislators agreed that the platform should give access to data that is already public in line with the rules of the originating legal acts. Horizontal legislation governing public access to information (Regulation (EC) no 1049/2001) will apply to all data that is not confidential. Human biomonitoring studiesThe package will help ECHA, and other agencies, to generate studies for multiple purposes. The agreement proposes already a practical application of this possibility. Four years after the regulation on the common data platform enters into force, ECHA should commission a Union-wide human biomonitoring study to better understand the population's exposure to chemicals. Human biomonitoring data from the EU and national research programs will also be included in the platform. Next stepsThe provisional agreement reached with the European Parliament now needs to be endorsed and formally adopted by both institutions. BackgroundGlobal chemicals production is projected to double by 2030, according to the UN Environment Programme (Global Chemicals Outlook II, 2019), underscoring the growing importance of the EU’s chemical regulations. The “one substance one assessment” was part of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, that the Commission made public on 14 October 2020. As a core element of the European Green Deal’s zero pollution ambition, the strategy aims to strengthen protection for people and the environment while driving innovation toward safe and sustainable chemicals. |
|
|
|
| ● Council of the EU | | | 12/06/2025 16:07 | Press release | | | | | The Council decided today to impose restrictive measures against three individuals and one entity related to actions undermining democracy and the rule of law in Guatemala. The Council remains deeply concerned about actions that undermine democracy and the rule of law in Guatemala, including through the persistent instrumentalisation of the justice system. The Council is particularly concerned about continued attacks against the democratically elected government of President Arévalo and the misuse of legal and procedural measures to target elected officials, human rights defenders, journalists, indigenous leaders and independent judicial operators. The Council has therefore listed the Foundation against Terrorism (FCT), its president Ricardo Rafael Méndez Ruiz Valdes, and its legal representative Raúl Amílcar Falla Ovalle for actions that undermine the rule of law in Guatemala, consisting of persecution and intimidation of representatives of the media, and of lawyers, judges and prosecutors. The FCT and its targeted members have initiated a multitude of criminal investigations against justice operators, journalists and representatives of the government, and engaged in the intimidation of civil society and the judiciary. Furthermore, the Council has imposed restrictive measures on the First Instance Criminal Judge of the Tenth Court in Guatemala, Jimi Rodolfo Bremer Ramírez for actions undermining democracy and the rule of law in Guatemala, such as persecution and intimidation of the representatives of the media, and of lawyers and prosecutors in Guatemala. The EU restrictive measures now apply to 8 persons and 1 entity. Those designated are subject to an asset freeze, and EU citizens and companies are forbidden from making funds available to them. In addition, natural persons are subject to a travel ban, which prevents them from entering or transiting through EU territories. These targeted sanctions are precisely designed to hold accountable and affect only those responsible for responsible for, engaging in, providing support to, or benefitting from actions that undermine democracy, the rule of law or the peaceful transfer of power in Guatemala. They are in no way sanctions against Guatemala, its population or its economy. The EU and Guatemala have a long-standing partnership and the EU remains committed to support democracy in the country. The 2023 EU Election Observation Mission, the EU’s clear position in defence of the election results, its support to good governance and above-mentioned targeted sanctions are all part of this effort. The EU will continue to work with the Guatemalan government and all sectors of society to support a positive national agenda and to invest inclusive and sustainable development to the benefit of all. BackgroundTo support the democratic transition and respect the will of Guatemalan people for the democratically elected government, the EU adopted a dedicated framework for restrictive measures in respect of Guatemala on 12 January 2024, to hold accountable those undermining democracy, the rule of law or obstructing a democratic transition following the 2023 general elections, which resulted in a clear victory of President Bernardo Arévalo, as attested by the EU Election Observation Mission (EOM) to Guatemala. The first set of five listings was agreed in February 2024. |
|
|