| Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien And Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Yuri Kim Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Albania and Germany |
| 02/13/2024 |
02/13/2024 07:21 PM EST James O'Brien, Assistant Secretary Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Yuri Kim, Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Via Teleconference MR PATEL: Hey. Good afternoon, everybody, and thanks so much for joining us and appreciate everyone’s flexibility on the last-minute time change. Just a quick – a few ground rules at the top. This call is going to be on the record but embargoed until the call’s conclusion. We, of course, will have some time for questions at the end, but wanted to give a quick introduction of our speakers. Joining us today is Assistant Secretary Jim O’Brien and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Yuri Kim. They will talk through the Secretary’s visit to Albania as well as the Munich Security Conference. So Ambassador Kim, why don’t I kick it over to you first? AMBASSADOR KIM: Okay, great. Thanks very much for the opportunity. So as everybody knows, we’re going to be taking off tomorrow for a two-stop trip in Europe. The first stop is going to be essentially a day stop in Albania that’ll run from about 11:00 until about 7:00 or 8:00 in the evening. And this is really a stop that is going to focus on the future, the future of Albania, the future of the Western Balkans, where you may recall that Assistant Secretary Jim O’Brien recently was there was to talk about Bosnia-Herzegovina, but in any case, the future of the Western Balkans and the future of Europe. In all of this, the visit comes as we’re kicking off the second 100 years of U.S.-Albania relations. It comes at a time when we want to go and thank Prime Minister Rama and Albania for being our co-penholder on the UN Security Council from . They’re now on the Human Rights Council. We want to emphasize and highlight the great cooperation that we have with Albania, we want to thank them for having been a main host of Afghans in need, with the Albanians continuing their historic tradition of giving refuge to those who are in the way of harm – in harm’s way. So that’s what we want to do. There are a few events here. It’s a pretty tight schedule. So he’ll go and he’ll meet with the President Begaj, and then he’ll have a meeting with the prime minister. This is not necessarily in chronological order, by the way. But he’ll have a bilateral meeting with the prime minister, at the tail end of which he’ll have a joint press avail. In between that, though, somewhere along the line, he’s going to have a lovely encounter with young people, probably about 100 or so folks, and it’s noteworthy for a couple of reasons. First is that it’s about 100 people who have gone through our various exchange programs, like the Fulbright or the IVLP and any number of other programs. And the venue for that event is going to be the pyramid. This used to be – I think many of you are familiar with Albania’s reputation during the bad old communist days as the North Korea of Europe, a severely isolated and repressive regime. The pyramid was built during the ’80s as a mausoleum to their dictator Enver Hoxha, and it’s kind of gone through several incarnations since the collapse of communism in 1991. But a couple of years ago, the city of Tirana and the Albanian-American Development Foundation joined hands to remake the pyramid into essentially an incubator for innovation and tech. So I think it’s as lovely idea. It’s also a building that was designed by – I think it was Dutch designers. But it’s quite interesting, and we’re looking forward to taking a look at this facility that’s just been opened a few months ago. Let me stop there. MR PATEL: Great. Let’s now pass it over to Assistant Secretary O’Brien. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Thanks, Vedant, and thanks, Yuri. I’ll just say a few words. So the Secretary will spend Friday and Saturday at the Munich Security Conference. It’s a venue that brings together leaders from across the European and Eurasian land mass, but also from around the globe, so it’s a convenient spot to address a number of issues. The delegation – U.S. delegation is being led by Vice President Harris. The Secretary and the Vice President will have some work together, and – as well as she will deliver a keynote address in the conference as well. Throughout his meetings he’s going to be highlighting four themes. One is support for Ukraine – so he will pivot off today’s move from the – by the Senate on the supplemental bill, but also address how our coalition can continue to make this war even more a strategic failure for Russia, but also help Ukraine succeed. The second theme will be addressing the Middle East. So he’ll reaffirm U.S. support for Israel’s right to respond to terrorist attacks, and also talk about how the situation in Gaza can be ameliorated, and in particular taking all possible steps to protect civilians and to increase the amount of humanitarian assistance, taking into account the discussions that are ongoing about releasing hostages and a potential pause in the fighting. The third theme is to talk about the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. And given the global participants at the conference, this will be a good opportunity to drive that message home. And the final theme will be to discuss the importance of cooperation in international institutions and with states from around the world. One event that will highlight this theme will be a public forum that’s on multilateralism with the Indian minister of external affairs and the German foreign minister. So for our German journalist guests, this will be one public manifestation of why we think this is not only a good conference, but it is very good that it be held in Germany with one of our primary global partners, the German Government. With that, Vedant, why don’t I turn it back over to you and we can address questions that may come up. MR PATEL: Great, thanks so much. Operator, could you please remind folks on instructions to join the question queue? OPERATOR: If you would like to ask a question on today’s call, please press 1 then 0. You may remove yourself from queue at any time by pressing 1 then 0 again. If you are on a speaker phone, please pick up the handset before pressing the numbers. Once again, the command to ask a question is 1, then 0. And one moment please for our first question. MR PATEL: Let’s first go to the line of Nick Schifrin from PBS. QUESTION: Thanks so much for this. Jim, one of the obvious questions going into Munich follows the former president’s comments on NATO this weekend. How will the Secretary reinforce the message that the President has been sending that we are united with Ukraine and that we’re united transatlantically despite the former president’s comments, when the Secretary does not have the supplemental in hand to be able to say the U.S. is putting its money where its mouth is? Thanks. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, do you want to take a few, or do you want me just to address that? MR PATEL: Sure, go ahead. Go ahead, Jim. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Okay. Yeah. Hey, Nick, sorry – sorry I didn’t get to see you yesterday. Hope everything’s all right. QUESTION: Yeah, sorry about that. Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: So no, I think people around the world are – understand our domestic process and that the U.S. works through these processes at a time. So it won’t be a surprise to them that we’re mid-course. I think they’ll take heart from the size of the vote and from the President’s endorsement of the legislation as it emerged, and that will give us a strong hand there. A question will be whether the former president is expressing his pride that contributions to defense went up under his time, just as they did for the two administrations surrounding him; or whether he’s expressing skepticism that they should go up. And I think that’s for him to clarify. But I think it’s been clear for now 75 years this summer that the U.S. stands by our NATO commitments. Administrations from both parties of all ideological persuasions have regarded NATO as the bedrock of our security, certainly in Europe but increasingly a global partner. And I think that’s the answer that they will come to. So the Secretary can explain this, put it in context, and prepare to then carry back to the U.S. the message of support that we get from our partners. And I’ll just close with this note. One point that has been a theme since the end of the Cold War has been that the U.S. needs to do things with others, not alone, without support from others. In the case of Ukraine, our partners have contributed more in assistance than the U.S. has. Even on defense cooperation they are providing almost as much as we are, and in total it’s more. So this is an example of what the U.S. has always wanted, of having our partners with us when we engage in something like this. And the size and the increases we’re seeing in partners’ commitment to their own defense, particularly in NATO, also illustrates how we’re in this together. And that’s how they’ll emerge from the Munich conference. MR PATEL: Thanks so much. Let’s next go to the line of Felicia Schwartz with The Financial Times. QUESTION: If you could speak to how the West’s assessment of what Russia would do – you had Denmark’s defense minister say recently that Russia could attack a NATO country in as little as three years. That’s changed since 2022 when the U.S. and other partners were sure that Russia would not attack a NATO country. So I’m wondering how you can explain that shift. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I didn’t hear the first part of the question; I apologize. QUESTION: No worries. Recently Denmark’s defense minister said Russia could attack a NATO country in as little as three years, and I’m wondering how – I think we heard from the U.S. and others in 2022, when the war first started, that the assessment was that Russia would not attack a NATO country. So – anytime soon. So I’m wondering if you can speak to how this assessment has changed. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I haven’t seen what the Danish defense minister said, so I don’t know the context of that. I think we’ve been very clear that the best deterrence comes from preparing our defense. The collective security aspect of NATO increases the ability of each of its members to defend its territory. So having a strong NATO, having a NATO where its members increase their investment in their defense, and having the U.S. stand strong along with the collective security element of NATO, we think, is an effective way of keeping Russia from being aggressive. As far as what Russia will do, I think we just got several hours of President Putin. And at any time in that fairly friendly interview, he could have said that he had no designs or no interest. Instead, we got a history lesson on just how far-reaching his interests might be. But I think it will depend on whether he assesses that there’s an opportunity, and that’s why strong defense of the kind we’ll emphasize this weekend is the best answer. MR PATEL: Great, let’s next go to the line of Alex Marquardt with CNN. QUESTION: Ambassador, the number two point on your summary there, the – addressing issues in Israel and Gaza, just specifically, where do you – do you think the Secretary is going to be addressing that? It seems that the two opportunities that we’re going to see him speak publicly in Albania and then in the forum on multilateralism don’t exactly lend themselves to addressing those issues. So when will he be speaking to that? And then I don’t – it might be too soon for this, but is there anything that happened today in Cairo in terms of the hostage talks, the talks on a humanitarian pause, that he would hope to build on in meetings and conversations in Munich? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, do you want to take the question? So I think the Secretary is going to have a number of meetings in the private part of the conference, and I think that’ll be where we discuss with our partners from the region and from Europe on next steps across the Middle East, the Red Sea, Gaza, and so on. But Vedant, do you want to take more on that? And then I’m not going to comment on the discussions in Cairo. MR PATEL: Yeah. Absolutely. Thanks, Jim. And just to build on what the ambassador said, we expect the Secretary to have a number of bilateral engagements over the course of the Munich Security Conference. We’ll of course have more to share on those as the schedules for each day become clearer and clearer. And we expect in a number of those the Secretary will address and discuss with his counterparts the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Separately, on your second question, Alex, I just don’t have any updates for you. And again, this call is limited in scope on the upcoming trip. We just finished the Daily Press Briefing where I believe Spokesperson Miller addressed a number of these things, so would point you back to that. Let’s next go to the line of Alex Raufoglu with News Agency Turan. QUESTION: Hi, Vedant. Thank you so much for doing this, and I appreciate the speakers for their time. Quick questions about the Munich leg of the trip and the security conversation. Is – on Sweden’s NATO accession and Hungary’s opposition to it, is the Secretary planning to get more publicly and more directly involved into this given his history of active engagement on this topic as recently as with the Turks? Do we know what Hungary’s reason actually is or if they even have any reason? And my second question about Azerbaijan-Armenia, Munich summits have been a place for engagement recently. As you know, last year Secretary hosted a trilateral meeting. Just wondering how much of the latest clashes complicate diplomacy or potential – a path for diplomacy. And why do you think this is happening now? Thank you so much. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I’m sorry, I didn’t get the context of the second question. I apologize. I’m at the airport so it’s a little noisy. I just heard a reference to a trilateral last year, but I’m — QUESTION: Right, can you hear me now? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yes. QUESTION: Yes, yes, the question was: Given the latest clashes between the two countries, how much it complicates the path – potential – for potential diplomacy at the summit? And why do you think these clashes are happening right now? Thanks so much again. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yeah. So on the first question, I don’t know that we’d characterize it as Hungary opposing. What Prime Minister Orban has said is that – first he said Hungary would not be the last to ratify Sweden, and we hope it will not be the last for long. And he said as soon as parliament returns in its regular session, which will be next week, the 26th, it will take up the matter. He anticipates that they’ll approve Sweden’s membership in NATO. So we’ll expect to hold them to that, and I think that’s the path that we’re on. On the latter, I think the tensions now just point to the importance of more diplomacy, but I don’t want to speculate on any particular recent action, so we’ll just continue the path of trying to bring the parties together. MR PATEL: Great. Let’s next go to the line of Michael Birnbaum. QUESTION: (Inaudible) so much for doing this. I appreciate it. A question about Europe looking at the American political context and Trump’s general attitudes toward defending Europe. There are a few ideas that flit over the air about kind of setting up a more Europe- based defense system, different kind of fallback plans for how Europe could defend itself better if America were not ultimately coming to its aid. Do you think those kinds of efforts are useful? I mean, do you think it’d be better if Europe were in fact able to stand on its own if it ever got there, or do you think that’s actually counterproductive to NATO planning, NATO efforts, and a general kind of ongoing transatlantic bond? What do you think the Europeans should do when they look at those Trump comments and the U.S. political scene? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: But I think, Michael – and thanks for the question. I think for us the important point is that our partners should invest in their defense. That’s the goal between both the top-line measurements – 2 percent of GDP invested in national defense, 20 percent of that on major equipment – but also on NATO’s effort to have a strong regional defense plan that it can actually execute so we know the money is being spent wisely. The question of exactly how they’d spend that money is something that we discuss within the Alliance and across the partnerships, and I expect certainly at the NATO Summit this summer we’ll have some discussions on how we look at what defense will be needed in the future, and we’ll come out of that a stronger Alliance. I think that’s independent of daily headlines. This particular surge in investment in defense is something that started in 2014. We saw the investment numbers go up immediately after the Wales Summit in 2014, and they continued going up through the Obama administration, across the Trump administration, and they in fact increased even more in the first few years of the Biden administration. So this is a thing that’s independent of a particular firestorm, but it’s the right thing for an alliance to do. MR PATEL: Great, let’s next go to the line of Nadia Bilbassy. QUESTION: Hi, thank you for doing this. A couple of questions. First, why do you feel the need to send two senior officials to the Munich summit? You have the Secretary of State, the Vice President. Apart from that you outlined that she will give a keynote speech, how their roles will be similar or overlap? And second, on Gaza, if I’m not wrong, I think you said that the Secretary will explain Israel’s right to defend itself and the U.S. position, but there’s never been an agreement with European leaders. I think they disagree on how the war is executed and the large number of civilian casualties. So what exactly the message for the Secretary, and why do you feel there is a need to keep repeating that Israel has the right to defend itself? Thank you. MR PATEL: Jim, do you want me to – do you want me to take those? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yeah, why don’t you do that one. Yeah. MR PATEL: First, Nadia, I would say that there are – we expect a number of officials from the U.S. Government to be present at the Munich Security Conference, and their respective departments and offices can – I’m sure would be happy to walk through their specific programming. From the State Department’s perspective, this is a really important opportunity to meet with counterparts from Europe as well as from other parts of the world to discuss the very important issues at hand. I expect, of course, that the Secretary will do that, but I fully expect that other American officials will be – will have their own scheduling cadence of bilateral engagements, and it’s important for those to continue at the various levels of governmental representation that we will have at the Munich Security Conference. On your second point, I take issue with the phrasing of your question. We believe that there continues to be convergence between us and our European allies on the right for Israel to be able to defend itself and to hold the Hamas terrorists who conducted the October 7th terroristic attacks accountable. We expect that the Secretary will talk about these things in his bilateral engagements, but as well as talking about the very important matters of ensuring that additional steps be taken to minimize the impact on civilians as well as additional steps be taken to ensure that humanitarian aid can continue to flow into Gaza. Let’s now go to the line of Humeyra Pamuk with Reuters. QUESTION: Hello, can you hear me? MR PATEL: Yeah, go ahead. QUESTION: Okay, sorry. Thanks. I accidentally hung up and came back, so I’m sorry if something like this was asked in – during my absence. Also, Ambassador Kim must be delighted to be returning, sort of paying a short visit to her previous post, where she was almost a borderline celebrity. I’m just going to ask about Ukraine. I wonder what’s going to be your message of support to Ukraine given the supplemental is struggling to pass. How can you really assure the allies when, because of Congress, the administration is effectively unable to put its money where its mouth is? And maybe a follow-up to a previous question on Trump: How are you going to, like, choreograph that message? How are you going to reinforce when a former president who’s also campaigning is coming out with such strong commentary about NATO and where – when, according to the polls, that there is a decent chance that he might be at the White House this time next year? What exactly – like, how can you assure the allies that U.S. policy will have continuity basically? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, I gave a bit of an answer to that. Do you want me to try and improve, or do you want to take a shot? Why don’t I – I can go ahead. So I think that here are the main points. Our allies understand that we have domestic politics just as they do, and they can look at progress through the – through our Congress. They also have seen, as I have, that there is overwhelming support from members in the House as well as the Senate for the supplemental. The question is whether the leadership will put it to a vote, and that’s a choice that the Speaker in particular has to face, and we have seen this situation happen before. I believe the U.S. will do the right thing because we understand that if we stand with our allies that all of us are stronger together. As far as how people interpret President Trump’s views, I think that’s up to them – whether they interpret him as expressing his pride that he brought increased investment into the national defense of our Allies or that he’s expressing skepticism that that was necessary. But I believe that Americans stood by NATO for 75 years as its leading member and will continue. We’re going to prepare this summer for the next period of NATO defending our future, and I think our Allies will see that commitment and know that even when America has come close to adopting isolation sentiments, we have always come back to this leadership role. That’s the purpose of an alliance: that you know you can count on each other whatever the headlines are from week to week. MR PATEL: Thanks so much, Ambassador. And that, folks, is all the time we have for today. As a reminder, this call was on the record, embargoed until the call’s conclusion, which (inaudible). MR TEK: Sorry, we lost Vedant. Just as a reminder, this call is concluded. It was on the record and embargoed until now. Thank you all so much for joining us and have a great rest of your day. |
| Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien And Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Yuri Kim Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Albania and Germany |
| 02/13/2024 |
02/13/2024 07:21 PM EST James O'Brien, Assistant Secretary Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Yuri Kim, Principal Deputy Assistant SecretaryBureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Via Teleconference MR PATEL: Hey. Good afternoon, everybody, and thanks so much for joining us and appreciate everyone’s flexibility on the last-minute time change. Just a quick – a few ground rules at the top. This call is going to be on the record but embargoed until the call’s conclusion. We, of course, will have some time for questions at the end, but wanted to give a quick introduction of our speakers. Joining us today is Assistant Secretary Jim O’Brien and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Yuri Kim. They will talk through the Secretary’s visit to Albania as well as the Munich Security Conference. So Ambassador Kim, why don’t I kick it over to you first? AMBASSADOR KIM: Okay, great. Thanks very much for the opportunity. So as everybody knows, we’re going to be taking off tomorrow for a two-stop trip in Europe. The first stop is going to be essentially a day stop in Albania that’ll run from about 11:00 until about 7:00 or 8:00 in the evening. And this is really a stop that is going to focus on the future, the future of Albania, the future of the Western Balkans, where you may recall that Assistant Secretary Jim O’Brien recently was there was to talk about Bosnia-Herzegovina, but in any case, the future of the Western Balkans and the future of Europe. In all of this, the visit comes as we’re kicking off the second 100 years of U.S.-Albania relations. It comes at a time when we want to go and thank Prime Minister Rama and Albania for being our co-penholder on the UN Security Council from . They’re now on the Human Rights Council. We want to emphasize and highlight the great cooperation that we have with Albania, we want to thank them for having been a main host of Afghans in need, with the Albanians continuing their historic tradition of giving refuge to those who are in the way of harm – in harm’s way. So that’s what we want to do. There are a few events here. It’s a pretty tight schedule. So he’ll go and he’ll meet with the President Begaj, and then he’ll have a meeting with the prime minister. This is not necessarily in chronological order, by the way. But he’ll have a bilateral meeting with the prime minister, at the tail end of which he’ll have a joint press avail. In between that, though, somewhere along the line, he’s going to have a lovely encounter with young people, probably about 100 or so folks, and it’s noteworthy for a couple of reasons. First is that it’s about 100 people who have gone through our various exchange programs, like the Fulbright or the IVLP and any number of other programs. And the venue for that event is going to be the pyramid. This used to be – I think many of you are familiar with Albania’s reputation during the bad old communist days as the North Korea of Europe, a severely isolated and repressive regime. The pyramid was built during the ’80s as a mausoleum to their dictator Enver Hoxha, and it’s kind of gone through several incarnations since the collapse of communism in 1991. But a couple of years ago, the city of Tirana and the Albanian-American Development Foundation joined hands to remake the pyramid into essentially an incubator for innovation and tech. So I think it’s as lovely idea. It’s also a building that was designed by – I think it was Dutch designers. But it’s quite interesting, and we’re looking forward to taking a look at this facility that’s just been opened a few months ago. Let me stop there. MR PATEL: Great. Let’s now pass it over to Assistant Secretary O’Brien. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Thanks, Vedant, and thanks, Yuri. I’ll just say a few words. So the Secretary will spend Friday and Saturday at the Munich Security Conference. It’s a venue that brings together leaders from across the European and Eurasian land mass, but also from around the globe, so it’s a convenient spot to address a number of issues. The delegation – U.S. delegation is being led by Vice President Harris. The Secretary and the Vice President will have some work together, and – as well as she will deliver a keynote address in the conference as well. Throughout his meetings he’s going to be highlighting four themes. One is support for Ukraine – so he will pivot off today’s move from the – by the Senate on the supplemental bill, but also address how our coalition can continue to make this war even more a strategic failure for Russia, but also help Ukraine succeed. The second theme will be addressing the Middle East. So he’ll reaffirm U.S. support for Israel’s right to respond to terrorist attacks, and also talk about how the situation in Gaza can be ameliorated, and in particular taking all possible steps to protect civilians and to increase the amount of humanitarian assistance, taking into account the discussions that are ongoing about releasing hostages and a potential pause in the fighting. The third theme is to talk about the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. And given the global participants at the conference, this will be a good opportunity to drive that message home. And the final theme will be to discuss the importance of cooperation in international institutions and with states from around the world. One event that will highlight this theme will be a public forum that’s on multilateralism with the Indian minister of external affairs and the German foreign minister. So for our German journalist guests, this will be one public manifestation of why we think this is not only a good conference, but it is very good that it be held in Germany with one of our primary global partners, the German Government. With that, Vedant, why don’t I turn it back over to you and we can address questions that may come up. MR PATEL: Great, thanks so much. Operator, could you please remind folks on instructions to join the question queue? OPERATOR: If you would like to ask a question on today’s call, please press 1 then 0. You may remove yourself from queue at any time by pressing 1 then 0 again. If you are on a speaker phone, please pick up the handset before pressing the numbers. Once again, the command to ask a question is 1, then 0. And one moment please for our first question. MR PATEL: Let’s first go to the line of Nick Schifrin from PBS. QUESTION: Thanks so much for this. Jim, one of the obvious questions going into Munich follows the former president’s comments on NATO this weekend. How will the Secretary reinforce the message that the President has been sending that we are united with Ukraine and that we’re united transatlantically despite the former president’s comments, when the Secretary does not have the supplemental in hand to be able to say the U.S. is putting its money where its mouth is? Thanks. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, do you want to take a few, or do you want me just to address that? MR PATEL: Sure, go ahead. Go ahead, Jim. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Okay. Yeah. Hey, Nick, sorry – sorry I didn’t get to see you yesterday. Hope everything’s all right. QUESTION: Yeah, sorry about that. Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: So no, I think people around the world are – understand our domestic process and that the U.S. works through these processes at a time. So it won’t be a surprise to them that we’re mid-course. I think they’ll take heart from the size of the vote and from the President’s endorsement of the legislation as it emerged, and that will give us a strong hand there. A question will be whether the former president is expressing his pride that contributions to defense went up under his time, just as they did for the two administrations surrounding him; or whether he’s expressing skepticism that they should go up. And I think that’s for him to clarify. But I think it’s been clear for now 75 years this summer that the U.S. stands by our NATO commitments. Administrations from both parties of all ideological persuasions have regarded NATO as the bedrock of our security, certainly in Europe but increasingly a global partner. And I think that’s the answer that they will come to. So the Secretary can explain this, put it in context, and prepare to then carry back to the U.S. the message of support that we get from our partners. And I’ll just close with this note. One point that has been a theme since the end of the Cold War has been that the U.S. needs to do things with others, not alone, without support from others. In the case of Ukraine, our partners have contributed more in assistance than the U.S. has. Even on defense cooperation they are providing almost as much as we are, and in total it’s more. So this is an example of what the U.S. has always wanted, of having our partners with us when we engage in something like this. And the size and the increases we’re seeing in partners’ commitment to their own defense, particularly in NATO, also illustrates how we’re in this together. And that’s how they’ll emerge from the Munich conference. MR PATEL: Thanks so much. Let’s next go to the line of Felicia Schwartz with The Financial Times. QUESTION: If you could speak to how the West’s assessment of what Russia would do – you had Denmark’s defense minister say recently that Russia could attack a NATO country in as little as three years. That’s changed since 2022 when the U.S. and other partners were sure that Russia would not attack a NATO country. So I’m wondering how you can explain that shift. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I didn’t hear the first part of the question; I apologize. QUESTION: No worries. Recently Denmark’s defense minister said Russia could attack a NATO country in as little as three years, and I’m wondering how – I think we heard from the U.S. and others in 2022, when the war first started, that the assessment was that Russia would not attack a NATO country. So – anytime soon. So I’m wondering if you can speak to how this assessment has changed. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I haven’t seen what the Danish defense minister said, so I don’t know the context of that. I think we’ve been very clear that the best deterrence comes from preparing our defense. The collective security aspect of NATO increases the ability of each of its members to defend its territory. So having a strong NATO, having a NATO where its members increase their investment in their defense, and having the U.S. stand strong along with the collective security element of NATO, we think, is an effective way of keeping Russia from being aggressive. As far as what Russia will do, I think we just got several hours of President Putin. And at any time in that fairly friendly interview, he could have said that he had no designs or no interest. Instead, we got a history lesson on just how far-reaching his interests might be. But I think it will depend on whether he assesses that there’s an opportunity, and that’s why strong defense of the kind we’ll emphasize this weekend is the best answer. MR PATEL: Great, let’s next go to the line of Alex Marquardt with CNN. QUESTION: Ambassador, the number two point on your summary there, the – addressing issues in Israel and Gaza, just specifically, where do you – do you think the Secretary is going to be addressing that? It seems that the two opportunities that we’re going to see him speak publicly in Albania and then in the forum on multilateralism don’t exactly lend themselves to addressing those issues. So when will he be speaking to that? And then I don’t – it might be too soon for this, but is there anything that happened today in Cairo in terms of the hostage talks, the talks on a humanitarian pause, that he would hope to build on in meetings and conversations in Munich? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, do you want to take the question? So I think the Secretary is going to have a number of meetings in the private part of the conference, and I think that’ll be where we discuss with our partners from the region and from Europe on next steps across the Middle East, the Red Sea, Gaza, and so on. But Vedant, do you want to take more on that? And then I’m not going to comment on the discussions in Cairo. MR PATEL: Yeah. Absolutely. Thanks, Jim. And just to build on what the ambassador said, we expect the Secretary to have a number of bilateral engagements over the course of the Munich Security Conference. We’ll of course have more to share on those as the schedules for each day become clearer and clearer. And we expect in a number of those the Secretary will address and discuss with his counterparts the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Separately, on your second question, Alex, I just don’t have any updates for you. And again, this call is limited in scope on the upcoming trip. We just finished the Daily Press Briefing where I believe Spokesperson Miller addressed a number of these things, so would point you back to that. Let’s next go to the line of Alex Raufoglu with News Agency Turan. QUESTION: Hi, Vedant. Thank you so much for doing this, and I appreciate the speakers for their time. Quick questions about the Munich leg of the trip and the security conversation. Is – on Sweden’s NATO accession and Hungary’s opposition to it, is the Secretary planning to get more publicly and more directly involved into this given his history of active engagement on this topic as recently as with the Turks? Do we know what Hungary’s reason actually is or if they even have any reason? And my second question about Azerbaijan-Armenia, Munich summits have been a place for engagement recently. As you know, last year Secretary hosted a trilateral meeting. Just wondering how much of the latest clashes complicate diplomacy or potential – a path for diplomacy. And why do you think this is happening now? Thank you so much. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: I’m sorry, I didn’t get the context of the second question. I apologize. I’m at the airport so it’s a little noisy. I just heard a reference to a trilateral last year, but I’m — QUESTION: Right, can you hear me now? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yes. QUESTION: Yes, yes, the question was: Given the latest clashes between the two countries, how much it complicates the path – potential – for potential diplomacy at the summit? And why do you think these clashes are happening right now? Thanks so much again. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yeah. So on the first question, I don’t know that we’d characterize it as Hungary opposing. What Prime Minister Orban has said is that – first he said Hungary would not be the last to ratify Sweden, and we hope it will not be the last for long. And he said as soon as parliament returns in its regular session, which will be next week, the 26th, it will take up the matter. He anticipates that they’ll approve Sweden’s membership in NATO. So we’ll expect to hold them to that, and I think that’s the path that we’re on. On the latter, I think the tensions now just point to the importance of more diplomacy, but I don’t want to speculate on any particular recent action, so we’ll just continue the path of trying to bring the parties together. MR PATEL: Great. Let’s next go to the line of Michael Birnbaum. QUESTION: (Inaudible) so much for doing this. I appreciate it. A question about Europe looking at the American political context and Trump’s general attitudes toward defending Europe. There are a few ideas that flit over the air about kind of setting up a more Europe- based defense system, different kind of fallback plans for how Europe could defend itself better if America were not ultimately coming to its aid. Do you think those kinds of efforts are useful? I mean, do you think it’d be better if Europe were in fact able to stand on its own if it ever got there, or do you think that’s actually counterproductive to NATO planning, NATO efforts, and a general kind of ongoing transatlantic bond? What do you think the Europeans should do when they look at those Trump comments and the U.S. political scene? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: But I think, Michael – and thanks for the question. I think for us the important point is that our partners should invest in their defense. That’s the goal between both the top-line measurements – 2 percent of GDP invested in national defense, 20 percent of that on major equipment – but also on NATO’s effort to have a strong regional defense plan that it can actually execute so we know the money is being spent wisely. The question of exactly how they’d spend that money is something that we discuss within the Alliance and across the partnerships, and I expect certainly at the NATO Summit this summer we’ll have some discussions on how we look at what defense will be needed in the future, and we’ll come out of that a stronger Alliance. I think that’s independent of daily headlines. This particular surge in investment in defense is something that started in 2014. We saw the investment numbers go up immediately after the Wales Summit in 2014, and they continued going up through the Obama administration, across the Trump administration, and they in fact increased even more in the first few years of the Biden administration. So this is a thing that’s independent of a particular firestorm, but it’s the right thing for an alliance to do. MR PATEL: Great, let’s next go to the line of Nadia Bilbassy. QUESTION: Hi, thank you for doing this. A couple of questions. First, why do you feel the need to send two senior officials to the Munich summit? You have the Secretary of State, the Vice President. Apart from that you outlined that she will give a keynote speech, how their roles will be similar or overlap? And second, on Gaza, if I’m not wrong, I think you said that the Secretary will explain Israel’s right to defend itself and the U.S. position, but there’s never been an agreement with European leaders. I think they disagree on how the war is executed and the large number of civilian casualties. So what exactly the message for the Secretary, and why do you feel there is a need to keep repeating that Israel has the right to defend itself? Thank you. MR PATEL: Jim, do you want me to – do you want me to take those? ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Yeah, why don’t you do that one. Yeah. MR PATEL: First, Nadia, I would say that there are – we expect a number of officials from the U.S. Government to be present at the Munich Security Conference, and their respective departments and offices can – I’m sure would be happy to walk through their specific programming. From the State Department’s perspective, this is a really important opportunity to meet with counterparts from Europe as well as from other parts of the world to discuss the very important issues at hand. I expect, of course, that the Secretary will do that, but I fully expect that other American officials will be – will have their own scheduling cadence of bilateral engagements, and it’s important for those to continue at the various levels of governmental representation that we will have at the Munich Security Conference. On your second point, I take issue with the phrasing of your question. We believe that there continues to be convergence between us and our European allies on the right for Israel to be able to defend itself and to hold the Hamas terrorists who conducted the October 7th terroristic attacks accountable. We expect that the Secretary will talk about these things in his bilateral engagements, but as well as talking about the very important matters of ensuring that additional steps be taken to minimize the impact on civilians as well as additional steps be taken to ensure that humanitarian aid can continue to flow into Gaza. Let’s now go to the line of Humeyra Pamuk with Reuters. QUESTION: Hello, can you hear me? MR PATEL: Yeah, go ahead. QUESTION: Okay, sorry. Thanks. I accidentally hung up and came back, so I’m sorry if something like this was asked in – during my absence. Also, Ambassador Kim must be delighted to be returning, sort of paying a short visit to her previous post, where she was almost a borderline celebrity. I’m just going to ask about Ukraine. I wonder what’s going to be your message of support to Ukraine given the supplemental is struggling to pass. How can you really assure the allies when, because of Congress, the administration is effectively unable to put its money where its mouth is? And maybe a follow-up to a previous question on Trump: How are you going to, like, choreograph that message? How are you going to reinforce when a former president who’s also campaigning is coming out with such strong commentary about NATO and where – when, according to the polls, that there is a decent chance that he might be at the White House this time next year? What exactly – like, how can you assure the allies that U.S. policy will have continuity basically? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY O’BRIEN: Vedant, I gave a bit of an answer to that. Do you want me to try and improve, or do you want to take a shot? Why don’t I – I can go ahead. So I think that here are the main points. Our allies understand that we have domestic politics just as they do, and they can look at progress through the – through our Congress. They also have seen, as I have, that there is overwhelming support from members in the House as well as the Senate for the supplemental. The question is whether the leadership will put it to a vote, and that’s a choice that the Speaker in particular has to face, and we have seen this situation happen before. I believe the U.S. will do the right thing because we understand that if we stand with our allies that all of us are stronger together. As far as how people interpret President Trump’s views, I think that’s up to them – whether they interpret him as expressing his pride that he brought increased investment into the national defense of our Allies or that he’s expressing skepticism that that was necessary. But I believe that Americans stood by NATO for 75 years as its leading member and will continue. We’re going to prepare this summer for the next period of NATO defending our future, and I think our Allies will see that commitment and know that even when America has come close to adopting isolation sentiments, we have always come back to this leadership role. That’s the purpose of an alliance: that you know you can count on each other whatever the headlines are from week to week. MR PATEL: Thanks so much, Ambassador. And that, folks, is all the time we have for today. As a reminder, this call was on the record, embargoed until the call’s conclusion, which (inaudible). MR TEK: Sorry, we lost Vedant. Just as a reminder, this call is concluded. It was on the record and embargoed until now. Thank you all so much for joining us and have a great rest of your day. |
| Secretary Blinken Chairs Interagency Task Force Meeting |
| 02/13/2024 |
02/13/2024 08:35 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Secretary of State Antony Blinken chaired the 2024 During the meeting, Secretary Blinken presented the 2023 Presidential Award for Extraordinary Efforts to Combat Trafficking in Persons to two exceptional recipients: Dr. Minh Dang, co-founder and Executive Director of Survivor Alliance; and to Restore NYC. Secretary Blinken reaffirmed the Department’s commitment to combating human trafficking and inspiring engagement across the country and international community. The Department aims to do its part by:
A video recording of the meeting will be available at https://www.state.gov/the- |
| Release of the 2023 Equity Action Plan |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 08:13 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State President Biden issued two executive orders directing federal agencies to take comprehensive action to address barriers to opportunity for underserved communities and to embed equity into all aspects of federal decision-making. Over the past year, the Department has taken concrete steps to advance equity in foreign policy by refining tracking of foreign assistance programs to embed equity and inclusion into global programming, further integrating equity into public diplomacy, updating travel and citizenship documents and forms, and increasing small business awards by two percent. With today’s release of the 2023 Equity Action Plan, the Department continues to implement these executive orders with five global strategic focus areas: pursuing diplomatic efforts to combat hate and protect inclusive democracy; advancing racial equity and justice; protecting LGBTQI+ persons; promoting respect for international disability rights; and advancing gender equity and equality. These strategic focus areas bolster the Department’s enterprise-wide approach to integrating equity and inclusion operationally in foreign assistance; foreign policy development and implementation; public diplomacy; consular services; and procurement, contracts, and grants. Embedding equity in our work yields better outcomes for the American people. We will continue to work to break down barriers faced by marginalized and underserved populations. |
| Release of the 2023 Equity Action Plan |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 08:13 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State President Biden issued two executive orders directing federal agencies to take comprehensive action to address barriers to opportunity for underserved communities and to embed equity into all aspects of federal decision-making. Over the past year, the Department has taken concrete steps to advance equity in foreign policy by refining tracking of foreign assistance programs to embed equity and inclusion into global programming, further integrating equity into public diplomacy, updating travel and citizenship documents and forms, and increasing small business awards by two percent. With today’s release of the 2023 Equity Action Plan, the Department continues to implement these executive orders with five global strategic focus areas: pursuing diplomatic efforts to combat hate and protect inclusive democracy; advancing racial equity and justice; protecting LGBTQI+ persons; promoting respect for international disability rights; and advancing gender equity and equality. These strategic focus areas bolster the Department’s enterprise-wide approach to integrating equity and inclusion operationally in foreign assistance; foreign policy development and implementation; public diplomacy; consular services; and procurement, contracts, and grants. Embedding equity in our work yields better outcomes for the American people. We will continue to work to break down barriers faced by marginalized and underserved populations. |
| U.S. Participation in the EU – Sanctions Coordinators Forum |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 11:36 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson Building on the unique economic and security partnership between our economies, the U.S. Departments of State, Commerce, and Treasury, along with delegations from the UK and Ukraine, joined senior EU and member state government officials for a Sanctions Coordinators Forum in Brussels today. The Dialogue reinforced our shared commitment to strengthen our cooperation on sanctions by bringing together senior officials to discuss impacts and enforcement of our Russia sanctions regimes. We reaffirmed our shared commitment to supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty and opposing Russia’s aggression and that sanctions are a key tool in that effort. The delegations discussed the use of targeted sanctions to deter and disrupt malign Russian activity and to demonstrate our readiness to take action to defend international norms. In response to Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine, we have imposed unprecedented costs on the Kremlin and its collaborators with our allies and partners. Since the start of the war, the United States has designated over 3,500 individuals and entities, blocking billions of dollars in assets. Sanctions and export controls are starving Russia’s military of key components and technology and restricting Putin’s ability to fight a 21st century war. |
| U.S. Participation in the EU – Sanctions Coordinators Forum |
| 02/14/2024 |
. 02/14/2024 11:36 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson Building on the unique economic and security partnership between our economies, the U.S. Departments of State, Commerce, and Treasury, along with delegations from the UK and Ukraine, joined senior EU and member state government officials for a Sanctions Coordinators Forum in Brussels today. The Dialogue reinforced our shared commitment to strengthen our cooperation on sanctions by bringing together senior officials to discuss impacts and enforcement of our Russia sanctions regimes. We reaffirmed our shared commitment to supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty and opposing Russia’s aggression and that sanctions are a key tool in that effort. The delegations discussed the use of targeted sanctions to deter and disrupt malign Russian activity and to demonstrate our readiness to take action to defend international norms. In response to Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine, we have imposed unprecedented costs on the Kremlin and its collaborators with our allies and partners. Since the start of the war, the United States has designated over 3,500 individuals and entities, blocking billions of dollars in assets. Sanctions and export controls are starving Russia’s military of key components and technology and restricting Putin’s ability to fight a 21st century war. |
| Election in Indonesia |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 12:28 PM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson We congratulate the Indonesian people for their robust turnout in today’s election. This vote was a testament to the durability and strength of the Indonesian people’s commitment to the democratic process and electoral institutions. We look forward to the General Election Commission’s announcement of the official election results. This year, as we celebrate 75 years of U.S.-Indonesian diplomatic relations, we look forward to working with Indonesia’s next President-elect and government, as well as the legislative houses, on the shared priorities that benefit the people of both our countries, including addressing climate change, ensuring a prosperous and secure Indo-Pacific, and safeguarding international stability. The United States and Indonesia are close partners, guided by the principles set forth in our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. Together with Indonesia’s new administration, we will work to deliver a better future for our citizens and tackle the most pressing challenges of the 21st century. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Call with Algerian Foreign Minister Attaf |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 12:52 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Algerian Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf about ongoing diplomatic efforts to achieve an enduring end to the crisis in Gaza that provides lasting peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians alike. They discussed the urgency of ensuring civilians are protected, increasing humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza, and our strong commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. They agreed to continue close coordination on these issues on the UN Security Council. Secretary Blinken also conveyed his condolences to Foreign Minister Attaf for the deaths of three Algerian soldiers in a helicopter crash last week in Ghardaïa province. |
| Designating Persons Tied to Network Smuggling U.S. Technology to Central Bank of Iran |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 04:46 PM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson Designating Persons Tied to Network Smuggling U.S. Technology to Central Bank of IranPress Statement February 14, 2024 The United States is today designating four entities and three individuals tied to a network facilitating the illegal export of U.S. goods and technology to end users in Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran. The Central Bank of Iran has played a critical role in providing financial and technological support to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force and Hizballah, both foreign terrorist organizations and key drivers of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Today’s action demonstrates that defying export restrictions and circumventing sanctions against Iran will result in consequences. The United States is steadfast in its commitment to countering terrorist financing and will continue to use all available means to disrupt the illegal procurement of sensitive technology by the Iranian regime. The Department of the Treasury designations were taken pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended. For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release. |
| Designating Persons Tied to Network Smuggling U.S. Technology to Central Bank of Iran |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 04:46 PM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson Designating Persons Tied to Network Smuggling U.S. Technology to Central Bank of IranPress Statement February 14, 2024 The United States is today designating four entities and three individuals tied to a network facilitating the illegal export of U.S. goods and technology to end users in Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran. The Central Bank of Iran has played a critical role in providing financial and technological support to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force and Hizballah, both foreign terrorist organizations and key drivers of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. Today’s action demonstrates that defying export restrictions and circumventing sanctions against Iran will result in consequences. The United States is steadfast in its commitment to countering terrorist financing and will continue to use all available means to disrupt the illegal procurement of sensitive technology by the Iranian regime. The Department of the Treasury designations were taken pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended. For more information on today’s action, see Treasury’s press release. |
| The United States and Albania: NATO Allies and Close Friends |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 07:43 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The United States has been a strong partner and friend to Albania since the first diplomatic relations were established in 1922 and reestablished in 1991 following the fall of communist rule. We have been proud to partner with Albania as it has made progress to reinforce democracy, open up its economy, and provide greater opportunity for all its people. Albania and the United States have signed a number of arrangements, including a treaty on the prevention of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the promotion of defense and military relations; the Adriatic Charter on Euro-Atlantic integration; an arrangement for the operation of an Afghan Special Immigrant Visa platform on Albanian soil; and a memorandum of understanding on 4G and 5G security. The United States supports Albania’s European Union membership goal, as it did for Albania’s pursuit of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) membership. Bilateral Economic Relations The United States and Albania are committed to enhancing economic and commercial ties. In recent years, Albania has made great strides in promoting trade and opening a variety of sectors to foreign investment. Energy, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, travel and tourism, construction, and agriculture are leading sectors for U.S. exports and investment growth. United States investment in Albania has tripled compared to the pre-pandemic level of 2019, while trade in commodities between the two countries increased by one and a half times. Major imports from the United States include food, vehicles, and machinery, while the main exports to the United States include agricultural goods, ferroalloys, aluminum, and footwear. Albania is eligible to export certain products duty-free to the United States under the Generalized System of Preferences program. The United States and Albania have ratified a bilateral investment treaty. U.S. Assistance to Albania U.S. Government assistance aims to help Albania strengthen democratic institutions and rule of law; promote sustainable, broad-based economic growth; and integrate the country into European and Euro-Atlantic structures. The United States will continue to partner with Albania to counter corruption and organized crime and improve transparent, inclusive governance, critical for the country’s success in on its path toward EU integration. The United States and Albania are implementing one of our largest cyber security assistance efforts, amounting to over $50 million in support of strengthening Albania’s cyber defenses. Albania’s Membership in International Organizations Albania and the United States belong to a number of the same international organizations, including the United Nations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization. Albania also is an observer to the Organization of American States. As of June 2014, Albania is a candidate for accession into the European Union. Standing Together in Support of Ukraine The United States and Albania are working together – in coordination with other Allies and partners – to secure Ukraine’s future as a sovereign, free, and prosperous nation. We are committed to supporting the courageous and resilient people of Ukraine, helping them defend their nation from Russia’s brutal, unprovoked aggression, and deter against future attacks. Albania regularly contributes to regional and global security. Within the Adriatic Charter, Albania has acted as a mentor to new NATO aspirants. Albania and U.S. service members have stood side by side in military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq and as part of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL. We have worked together to freeze terror assets and shut down non-governmental organizations with possible links to terrorist financing. Albania contributes to operations around the globe, with troops deployed to Latvia as part of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) and to Kosovo as part of KFOR. Albania has committed to the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force and Enhanced Vigilance Activity. Beyond NATO, Albania sent its first-ever deployment to the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) peacekeeping mission in the Sinai and is a member of the Combined Maritime Force supporting operations in the Red Sea. Albania also hosts persistent a U.S. military presence. In 2022, Albania welcomed a Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR) headquarters, Task Group Balkans, and a U.S. Army Security Forces Assistance Brigade (SFAB) and works closely with the New Jersey National Guard on cyber defense and military training. Albania’s close relationship with both the New Jersey National Guard and SFAB helped them to successfully pass its NATO Combat Readiness Evaluation in late 2022. Assisting our Afghan Allies in their Time of Need With Albania’s steadfast support, the United States is making good on the commitments made to our Afghan allies. Albania’s assistance embodies its humanity and deep-rooted tradition of taking care of and giving refuge to those in need and further highlights the profound affinity between our nations. People to People Connections Albania and the United States share a strong connection and affinity that dates back to President Woodrow Wilson’s intervention in favor of Albania’s independence. Since the fall of communism in 1991, Americans and Albanians boosted our joint ties through exchange programs including the Fulbright, YES high school exchange, International Visitor Leadership Program, and others. There are more than 2,000 Albanian alumni of U.S. government programs. Peace Corps Volunteers serve throughout the country since 1992 and have been a vital part of people-to-people connections between our countries. For further information, please contact EUR-Press@state.gov, or visit website. |
| The United States and Albania: NATO Allies and Close Friends |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 07:43 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The United States has been a strong partner and friend to Albania since the first diplomatic relations were established in 1922 and reestablished in 1991 following the fall of communist rule. We have been proud to partner with Albania as it has made progress to reinforce democracy, open up its economy, and provide greater opportunity for all its people. Albania and the United States have signed a number of arrangements, including a treaty on the prevention of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the promotion of defense and military relations; the Adriatic Charter on Euro-Atlantic integration; an arrangement for the operation of an Afghan Special Immigrant Visa platform on Albanian soil; and a memorandum of understanding on 4G and 5G security. The United States supports Albania’s European Union membership goal, as it did for Albania’s pursuit of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) membership. Bilateral Economic Relations The United States and Albania are committed to enhancing economic and commercial ties. In recent years, Albania has made great strides in promoting trade and opening a variety of sectors to foreign investment. Energy, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, travel and tourism, construction, and agriculture are leading sectors for U.S. exports and investment growth. United States investment in Albania has tripled compared to the pre-pandemic level of 2019, while trade in commodities between the two countries increased by one and a half times. Major imports from the United States include food, vehicles, and machinery, while the main exports to the United States include agricultural goods, ferroalloys, aluminum, and footwear. Albania is eligible to export certain products duty-free to the United States under the Generalized System of Preferences program. The United States and Albania have ratified a bilateral investment treaty. U.S. Assistance to Albania U.S. Government assistance aims to help Albania strengthen democratic institutions and rule of law; promote sustainable, broad-based economic growth; and integrate the country into European and Euro-Atlantic structures. The United States will continue to partner with Albania to counter corruption and organized crime and improve transparent, inclusive governance, critical for the country’s success in on its path toward EU integration. The United States and Albania are implementing one of our largest cyber security assistance efforts, amounting to over $50 million in support of strengthening Albania’s cyber defenses. Albania’s Membership in International Organizations Albania and the United States belong to a number of the same international organizations, including the United Nations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization. Albania also is an observer to the Organization of American States. As of June 2014, Albania is a candidate for accession into the European Union. Standing Together in Support of Ukraine The United States and Albania are working together – in coordination with other Allies and partners – to secure Ukraine’s future as a sovereign, free, and prosperous nation. We are committed to supporting the courageous and resilient people of Ukraine, helping them defend their nation from Russia’s brutal, unprovoked aggression, and deter against future attacks. Albania regularly contributes to regional and global security. Within the Adriatic Charter, Albania has acted as a mentor to new NATO aspirants. Albania and U.S. service members have stood side by side in military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq and as part of the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL. We have worked together to freeze terror assets and shut down non-governmental organizations with possible links to terrorist financing. Albania contributes to operations around the globe, with troops deployed to Latvia as part of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) and to Kosovo as part of KFOR. Albania has committed to the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force and Enhanced Vigilance Activity. Beyond NATO, Albania sent its first-ever deployment to the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) peacekeeping mission in the Sinai and is a member of the Combined Maritime Force supporting operations in the Red Sea. Albania also hosts persistent a U.S. military presence. In 2022, Albania welcomed a Special Operations Command Europe (SOCEUR) headquarters, Task Group Balkans, and a U.S. Army Security Forces Assistance Brigade (SFAB) and works closely with the New Jersey National Guard on cyber defense and military training. Albania’s close relationship with both the New Jersey National Guard and SFAB helped them to successfully pass its NATO Combat Readiness Evaluation in late 2022. Assisting our Afghan Allies in their Time of Need With Albania’s steadfast support, the United States is making good on the commitments made to our Afghan allies. Albania’s assistance embodies its humanity and deep-rooted tradition of taking care of and giving refuge to those in need and further highlights the profound affinity between our nations. People to People Connections Albania and the United States share a strong connection and affinity that dates back to President Woodrow Wilson’s intervention in favor of Albania’s independence. Since the fall of communism in 1991, Americans and Albanians boosted our joint ties through exchange programs including the Fulbright, YES high school exchange, International Visitor Leadership Program, and others. There are more than 2,000 Albanian alumni of U.S. government programs. Peace Corps Volunteers serve throughout the country since 1992 and have been a vital part of people-to-people connections between our countries. For further information, please contact EUR-Press@state.gov, or visit website. |
| United States – Uruguay Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 08:05 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The United States will host the second annual U.S.-Uruguay Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue on February 15 in Washington, D.C. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian A. Nichols and Uruguayan Minister of Foreign Affairs Omar Ignacio Paganini Herrera will co-chair the dialogue. The U.S. delegation will include senior government officials from the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Commerce, the United States Agency for International Development, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration. The United States and Uruguay will discuss issues of shared interest including economic advancement through the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity, the Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation, countering regional transnational crime, and increasing drug prevention and treatment services. The dialogue will focus on innovative solutions to bolster bilateral and regional commerce, improve people-to-people exchanges, promote space cooperation, and partner on regional development projects. On global issues, the delegations will discuss mutual support for the Multinational Security Support mission to Haiti, implementation of the Barbados electoral roadmap agreement to support competitive presidential elections and restore democracy in Venezuela, and Russia’s unjust war against Ukraine. |
| Department Press Briefing – February 14, 2024 |
| 02/14/2024 |
02/14/2024 08:19 PM EST Department Press Briefing – February 14, 2024February 14, 2024 MR MILLER: Good afternoon, everyone. QUESTION: Good afternoon. MR MILLER: Happy Valentine’s Day, especially Happy Valentine’s Day to those of you celebrating with us on a flight somewhere over the Atlantic tonight instead of with your significant others. I wish you peace and tranquility at home. With that, no Matt – Shaun, you want to go first? QUESTION: Sure. Happy Valentine’s Day to you. MR MILLER: Thank you. Thank you. QUESTION: I wanted to ask you about – to start off – the talks in Cairo that took place recently, that are (inaudible) in some form. I know there’s a limit to probably what you’re going to say about it, but do you have any assessment right now about how things stand? Is the U.S. still hopeful that there could be a deal for hostages and a pause in fighting? MR MILLER: As has always been the case, I don’t want to kind of give a day-by-day, step-by-step update or assessment on the talks, or the status of them, or where they might stand; but we continue to believe that it is possible to achieve a deal. We continue to believe it’s in the national security interest of the United States to achieve deal. And we believe it’s in the interest of both Israel and, of course, the Palestinian people. So we will continue to work to try an achieve an agreement that would not just secure the release of hostages, but, of course, enable – allow a pause that would enable the delivery of humanitarian assistance that would alleviate the suffering on the ground in Gaza. QUESTION: Sure. Not to jump around too much, but the – I was wondering if you could comment on today’s developments in Lebanon. There’s some strikes there from the Israeli side in particular. How dangerous is the situation in Lebanon? Do you have any reaction in particular to the use of force? MR MILLER: We continue to be concerned about escalation in Lebanon. As you know, it has been one of our primary objectives from the outset of this conflict to see that it not be widened, to see that it not be escalated in any way. That continues to be a primary national security objective of ours that we will continue to pursue. And we continue to believe that there is a diplomatic path forward, and we will continue to push forward to try to resolve this issue diplomatically so both Israelis and Lebanese can return to their homes. QUESTION: Is there active diplomacy in Lebanon right now? MR MILLER: There is active diplomacy. There has been active diplomacy on this question for some time. I, of course, am never going to get into the underlying details of those diplomatic conversations, but we continue to pursue diplomatic resolution of this situation. QUESTION: And just one more before I yield to somebody else. The – I’m sure you saw, and I believe the National Security Advisor was asked about it, but I wanted to ask you – the report from The Wall Street Journal on white phosphorus use in Lebanon. Is there anything you can say whether the State Department is actually looking into that? MR MILLER: So as I said yesterday, we do continue – we are reviewing reports of human rights violations and civilian harm incidents through the CHIRG process that we set up last August. I’m not going to comment on the specifics of any one incident. We take these on a case-by-case measure and assess them to see whether, number one, civilian harm actually occurred; and, two, to identify any appropriate policy responses if it has occurred, to mitigate such – to reduce the risks of such incidents happening in the future. But we are going to make it as a kind of blanket policy not to confirm specific incidents that may be under review. Said, go ahead. QUESTION: Thank you. I want to ask you a couple questions on Gaza, but first I wanted to ask you about what the Israelis did today – demolished a house for Fakhri Abu Diab – he’s an activist against demolition – to basically make room for a biblical theme park. Do you have any comment on that? MR MILLER: We condemn the demolition of Fakhri Abu Diab’s home. He is a community leader in East Jerusalem. We believe that demolition not only obviously damages his home, and his family, and the lives that they have built there, but the entire community who live in fear that their homes may be next. This has been their family home for generations. Part of the structure dates back to before 1967. He has been an outspoken community leader, including against demolitions, and now his family has been displaced. But I want to – I would also like to reiterate that the impact of these demolitions – this is obviously not the first – goes beyond just the impact on this individual family. These acts obstruct efforts to advance a durable and lasting peace and security that would benefit not just Palestinians, but Israelis; they damage Israel’s standing in the world; and they make it ultimately more difficult for us to accomplish all of the things we are trying to accomplish that would ultimately be in the interest of the Israeli people. And so we condemn them and we’ll urge them – continue to urge that they not continue. QUESTION: Well, Silwan is really adjacent to my neighborhood so I know – I know the area. I know how many people have lost their homes, how many homes have been demolished, but the Israelis seem to have a methodical plan forward, going forward. I know that you condemn, but do you condemn saying “or else,” for instance? MR MILLER: So — QUESTION: “You must stop this”? And you – they should not demolish anybody’s homes, not even for – as a form of collective punishment if someone has done something from the household. MR MILLER: So we condemn them, and let me tell you what we are offering as an alternative. So the Secretary has made clear that after conversations with others in the region that there is a path forward – an alternative path to the one that Israel has pursued to date – to provide lasting peace and security for Israel, and it would include the establishment of two states. And we will continue to pursue that path. And we have made clear and other countries in the region, including Saudi Arabia, have made clear that there are enormous benefits on offer for the Israeli people should they pursue that path, including in further integration with the region, including security guarantees. And so when it comes to all of these types of issues, what we will continue to lay out is the vision that we think is a better path – as I said, not just for the Palestinian people, but ultimately that provides greater security benefits for the Israeli people as well. QUESTION: Now, on the looming or the expected attack on Rafah, I know that the President, the Secretary of State, you from this podium many times, however, warned against such a storming of Rafah. But on the other hand, I mean, one reads reports and so on that okay, by not doing anything, or by not saying that there will be consequences if you do this, you’re basically green-lighting – essentially giving a green light to the Israelis to go ahead. I mean, we just – we don’t like it, but we’re not going to do anything about it. MR MILLER: I think that would be a significant misinterpretation of what we have said. We have made quite clear both publicly and privately that we cannot support any military operation in Rafah until such time as Israel has developed a humanitarian plan that can be executed, and that they have executed such a plan. So I know people like to jump ahead far into the process and talk about what-ifs, but we’re not at the what-if stage right now; we are at the making very clear to Israel what we expect stage, and we have seen the Government of Israel ask the military for such a plan. We haven’t seen that plan yet; we don’t know what it’ll contain; we don’t know if it will be executable, as we have said. So we will wait before offering any prejudgments about what will, or may, or might, or might not happen. We’re going to wait to see what that plan looks like and then engage directly with the Government of Israel about it. QUESTION: So you’re saying, yeah, you can do this, with the caveat that you have to make sure that the population, the civilian population, is not harmed or somehow moved from place to place. Now, remember, these people have already been moved there. They have been instructed by the Israelis to go to Rafah (inaudible). MR MILLER: You don’t have to tell me “remember;” I’ve said that myself from this podium. QUESTION: I remember. But this is the thing. I mean, it’s déjà vu all over again. MR MILLER: Which is why we have made clear that there has to be a plan — QUESTION: To quote Yogi Bera, “déjà vu all over again.” MR MILLER: Look, there are – there are Hamas – there are – as I’ve said yesterday, there are two things that are true in this situation, right. One, that there are Hamas battalions that operate in Rafah, that exist in Rafah, that continue to pose a threat to the national security of Israel, Hamas battalions, part of an organization that attacked Israel and has made clear they want to continue to attack Israel. At the same time – so I’d say as a first matter of course, Israel has the right to take military action against those Hamas battalions that pose a threat to it. At the same time, they have an obligation to make sure that they only do so in a way that puts civilian protection first. And that is what we have made clear to them, and so we will see the plan that they will develop, and I will wait and pass judgment until we see that. QUESTION: Okay. MR MILLER: Alex. QUESTION: (Inaudible) topics. I want to start with NATO, given the recent debate in this town. NATO today disclosed that its defense spending hit a high record – record high, 18 members — MR MILLER: Eighteen. QUESTION: — about to hit the 2 percent. MR MILLER: Up from 11 I believe, right? QUESTION: That was a target, not the goal – or they don’t owe anyone any money. But can you speak to this, the import of this development? MR MILLER: We think it’s incredibly important. So look, we have made clear that there are targets that NATO countries have agreed to, that they would spend 2 percent of their budgets on national security. We have made clear that we expect countries to meet that target. There is often this misnomer that countries pay money to the U.S. and they’re in arrears; that, of course, is not factually the case. It’s not factually how it works. But there are defense spending targets that they are supposed to meet. As the secretary general announced today, a record number of those countries are now meeting those targets – 18, almost two thirds of the Alliance. And we continue to see progress from other countries towards meeting those targets, and we will urge those who have not yet met them to continue to take steps to do so. But again, as I’ve said – as I said earlier this week, NATO is an Alliance that the American people derive tremendous benefit from, provides tremendous security to the United States. And that’s why we have seen durable, long-lasting, widespread support – not just in Congress, not just from leaders in Congress, but also from the American people, and we expect that to continue. QUESTION: Thank you. A couple questions on the sanctions. The U.S. took part today in Brussels at EU Sanctions Coordinators Forum. This is the first time, if I – as far as I follow. There are reports that EU, on its end, is considering secondary sanctions against Central Asia, Türkiye, and other countries, or companies based in those countries, in its next batch. I know you don’t telegraph your sanctions, but can you at least assure us that — MR MILLER: But would I do it in this case? QUESTION: At least assure us that you — MR MILLER: It’s okay. QUESTION: — will not – you will follow unless you – once they put it out, or is it part of the conversation? MR MILLER: Assure you that – assure you that what? QUESTION: That the U.S. will not lag behind when Europeans move forward with this? MR MILLER: I don’t think – if you look at the United States actions in this guard – in this regard, we have been a leader, we have been at the forefront at holding Russia accountable for its actions, and we will continue to be – to be a leader in this regard. But of course, as you I think knew by the way you framed your question, I am not going to preview any sanctions action that we may or may not take. QUESTION: And on that line, Putin today signed a confiscation law, which experts believe that further complicates – endangers, if you want – foreign investment, including Americans. And this is something we discussed in this room before, that State Department recently updated its Business Advisory for Burma. Why not impose a same advisory on Russia? MR MILLER: I just don’t have any update on where that stands. QUESTION: And one – my final question, if you don’t mind — MR MILLER: Yeah. QUESTION: — on Nagorno-Karabakh. Jake Sullivan today from White House podium announced that the conflict in itself – also support for the victims of the conflict – he said it’s part of the next package. Is the State Department looking for additional resources? I mean, in what form you are trying to get involved? MR MILLER: Additional resources in what – in what regard? QUESTION: In next package, he mentioned that the Congress should support supplemental, because it also covers, among other conflicts, he mentioned Nagorno-Karabakh. So what additional resources you are seeking right now? MR MILLER: So there are additional resources that were in the supplemental request for humanitarian assistance. I didn’t see all of the National Security Advisor’s remarks. I believe that’s what he was referring to, or I suspect – I should say – that’s what he was referring to. But there was humanitarian assistance contained in the supplemental request that we put forward and in the bill that was passed the Senate that would – could be used by the United States for humanitarian response to conflicts all around the world. QUESTION: Any update for me about additional efforts that U.S. wants to bring together the sides and to discuss the conflict? Anything about the next couple of days, weeks? MR MILLER: I do not have any schedule announcements for you. I know what you’re getting at, but I’m not going to bite, Alex. MR MILLER: Yeah. QUESTION: Yeah. It’s clear now that Hizballah – Hizballah announced a few days ago, a couple of days ago, that his war activities or military activities or engagement in this conflict is linked to the war and military activities in Gaza. If there is a humanitarian pause, he will pause; if there is end of the war, he will end his activities. Is it the same diplomatic approach you are applying to this conflict of the northern border, or you are trying to push Lebanon to distance itself from the conflict, regardless of what happened in Gaza? MR MILLER: We have had specific diplomatic engagements related to the situation at Israel’s northern border and to resolving that situation diplomatically beyond the efforts to secure a humanitarian pause. Now, that said, of course it is our assessment that achieving a humanitarian pause and an agreement to secure the release of hostages would help with the risk of escalation and help – might help lessen the risk of escalation. That’s one of the many reasons why we continue to pursue such an arrangement. QUESTION: Thank you. QUESTION: You touched on this yesterday, but with the Secretary heading to Munich, European security and the war in Ukraine a focus, does he find himself in a difficult negotiating position with aid, foreign aid, stalled in the House? And how does he plan to address this, and how confident are you that the aid will make its way through? MR MILLER: So it’s not really a question of a negotiating position. I will say that, when it comes to our European partners, they have stepped up and made contributions to Ukraine I don’t believe because the United States has made contributions to Ukraine’s defense but because they see it in their own independent national security interest, and they have made their own assessments that it is the right thing to do, both on the merits, and that it is in their – in the interest of their particular countries. So it’s not a question of the United States needing to negotiate with these countries, though we, of course, always are encouraging countries to do more if they can do more. But that said, we very much do want to see Congress act as quickly as possible to pass the supplemental. As you heard the President say yesterday, it’s not just in the interest of Ukraine, but, as I said, it’s in the interest of European countries. It’s in the interest of the United States, we believe, to do so. A lot of that money is spent here, helps develop the manufacturing base here in the United States. And so we will continue to push for the passage of the supplemental bill, and ultimately we think – as the President said, the world is watching. And certainly I’m sure that when we are in Munich we will hear directly from foreign leaders that they are watching very much what Congress does. We know the Ukrainian people are watching. And as the President said, history is watching as well. Go ahead. QUESTION: Yes. It’s on Pakistan elections, thank you. How is U.S. State Department tackling the pressure from some of the U.S. lawmakers who are asking the State Department not to accept the results of Pakistan election until and unless thoroughly allegations of rigging are investigated? MR MILLER: So we have called for those allegations to be investigated. We think that’s appropriate step to take. That’s – that is our response to questions of irregularities not just in Pakistan, but when we see them anywhere in the world. We think that they’re thoroughly investigated and resolved. And so that – we will continue to call for that. But at the same time, it’s clear that the elections in Pakistan were competitive, and we look forward to working with the government, once it’s formed, that the people of Pakistan elected. QUESTION: Can I just follow up? MR MILLER: Yeah, Shaun. Go ahead. And then I’ll come back. QUESTION: Sure, sure. Just on that – I mean, of course, as you’ve probably seen that there’s a coalition being formed in Pakistan that doesn’t include Imran Khan’s party – I know you’re probably loath to talk about the details of Pakistani politics, but – (laughter) — MR MILLER: You’ve noticed. QUESTION: Well, let me – but I want to — MR MILLER: To be fair, loath to talk about the internal details of politics in any country, but — QUESTION: Sure, sure, sure. But can I just ask you if the U.S. has an assessment on this, whether this is in keeping with democratic principles to have the largest winner being excluded from the emerging coalition? MR MILLER: Look, that is ultimately an internal matter. You see this in a number of countries that have parliamentary systems of government, where no country has – or – I’m sorry – where no party has established a majority you see the kind of coalitions that are formed. Ultimately that’s not a decision for the United States to make. It’s a decision for Pakistan to make. QUESTION: Follow-up, Matt. MR MILLER: I promised her I would come to her next, so — QUESTION: The Foreign Policy magazine — MR MILLER: In fact, I was calling on her before Shaun interrupted, so anyway. So – and now I interrupted you, so I apologize for that. Go ahead. (Laughter.) QUESTION: The Foreign Policy magazine published an investigative report last week which shows that a former drug trafficker, Mr. Bashir Noorzai, who was serving a lifetime prison here in United State, was later released to the Taliban in exchange for one U.S. citizen, now is started working closely with China in the mineral contract and doing money laundering for Taliban. What’s your reaction to Chinese for this kind of partnership with this former drug trafficker? MR MILLER: You know, I have not seen that report. Let me take it back and get you a comment on it. Now go ahead. QUESTION: Happy Valentine’s to you, Matt. MR MILLER: Thank you. QUESTION: My next couple of questions are in the backdrop of former U.S. ambassador Mr. Ryan Crocker, who I believe served in – with both the Republicans and Democrats, so very well-respected diplomat. Yesterday while speaking to Voice of America, he said that the Biden administration policy towards Afghanistan is not good and he said not much importance has been given to the country, plus the education part has been neglected by the government. In the backdrop of all this, I want to ask you: Now, when the PTI government is in a province which is right next to Afghanistan, is my assessment correct that in coming days we will – we are going to see Taliban further increasing as far as their strength is concerned, or no? MR MILLER: So I do not want to make any predictions based on – about what may happen in the future, nor get into a question involving an internal political party in Pakistan. But with respect to our policy in Afghanistan, I think you heard me speak to this yesterday. We have been very – have been quite clear about our policy in – as it regards to Pakistan, including through the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution just in December. QUESTION: And just — MR MILLER: Go ahead. QUESTION: Thanks — MR MILLER: You want one follow-up? Go ahead. QUESTION: One follow-up, please. There are quite a few citizens – U.S. citizens – right now on social media who criticize the Pakistan serving military generals, army chiefs; they curse at them. I tried to get a reaction from Global Engagement Center. What do you, as a State Department official – is it fair that the social media influencers just curse around at serving military? Does not – does that not affect the government relationship with each other? I — MR MILLER: I think if I started trying to comment on the random postings of citizens on social media, I would be up here for the rest of the day and probably the rest of the week, so I’m going to pass. Go ahead. QUESTION: Thanks, Matthew. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner said that there’s information that’s been made to members of Congress regarding a serious national security threat. Is the State Department aware about this and – I’m – you’re probably going to say no, but is – what – do you know what is the threat? MR MILLER: So the National Security Advisor did just speak to this, and as he said, he has scheduled a meeting with Chairman Turner and other members of the House leadership, and it’s not appropriate to speak to the matter any further from – in a public setting, and so I will leave it at that for now. QUESTION: And following up on a question I asked yesterday regarding Ahlam Tamimi, who’s a terrorist wanted by the United States, did Secretary Blinken bring up that case in his meeting yesterday with King Abdullah? MR MILLER: I don’t have any further readouts, other than the note we issued publicly. QUESTION: And then finally, the House CCP Select Committee issued a report stating that some U.S. venture capital firms invested $3 billion into critical tech companies in China, some with ties to PLA and involved in genocide. What’s your reaction to that? And is the Biden – and has the Biden administration taken actions in the past to curb investments going into China, and does more need to be done? MR MILLER: So I have not seen that report, so I do not want to comment on the details of the report. But of course, there are U.S. statutes that prohibit the U.S. business – U.S. companies from doing business with companies that are engaged in genocide, and you – in addition to that, on a separate note, I will say that the U.S. has imposed a number of investment restrictions as it relates to China. Guita, go ahead. QUESTION: Thank you. QUESTION: Thank you. Matt, two natural gas pipelines blew up in Iran today, and the officials have called it a sabotage work. I was wondering if the Biden administration has any theory of its own on the cause of these explosions. MR MILLER: I’ve seen the reports, and I just don’t have any comment on them. QUESTION: When earlier one of the proxy groups of Iran attacked Tower 22 in Jordan, which led to the killing of three American servicemen, the Biden administration said that they were going to retaliate. Is it safe to assume that the retaliation will only be military or otherwise? MR MILLER: I don’t want to speak to that. The – we have made clear that some of our responses would be seen and some would be unseen, and I think I’ll leave it at that. Go ahead. QUESTION: Thank you very much. The Russian Ambassador Antonov said last week that he held meetings with U.S. officials, including at the State Department, and that he discussed with them the crash of the cargo plane, the Russian plane with Ukrainian prisoners of war, in the Belgorod region. And he said that U.S. officials showed interest in considering Russian proposals on investigating the incident. MR MILLER: I’m – sorry, go ahead. Didn’t mean — QUESTION: Can you confirm that the U.S. is ready to investigate the incident? MR MILLER: I cannot. I’m not aware of those meetings or able to comment on them in any regard. We obviously have an embassy in Moscow that does, at time, engage with the Russian Government, but I don’t have any readout of those meetings. QUESTION: And one more question on the same issue. Vedant said last week that the U.S. doesn’t consider Russian claims about the incident as credible. At the same time, New York – The New York Times reported last week that some U.S. officials admit that it was Ukraine that shot down the plane using a Patriot missile system. MR MILLER: I don’t – I seldom want to comment on claims made anonymously in any outlet, but we continue to engage with the Ukrainian Government about this question. We’ve seen their public comments, and we engage with them privately about it as well. Go ahead. QUESTION: Excuse me. During the hostage negotiations, like, we see there is some obstacles. Like, from your perspectives, which party is, like, more flexible for making these deals happen, like Hamas or Israel? Because what we see in the media – yeah – that, like, Hamas submitted a full proposal, but, like, we see Netanyahu is kind of a stubborn guy somehow. How do you assess this? And, like, last question, related to the Rafah. We see many protest in, like, Kerem Shalom border, like Israeli people preventing many aids to get in Rafah from their side. What is the action that you can take to facilitate this? Like, are you going to put some sanction? Like, what (inaudible) effort that you do to convince the Israeli Government to, like, let this protest stop and let this humanitarian aid get in the Rafah? MR MILLER: So with respect to the first one, I think the only way I’ll answer that is that in the response that you saw come back from Hamas to the proposal that was put forward by the Government of Israel and other countries, you saw a number of issues that were obvious nonstarters. For example, the status of al-Aqsa is not going to be resolved in a negotiation over hostages, and I will leave it at that. With respect to the second question, I will say we have seen the Government of Israel take steps to keep Kerem Shalom open. They declared the area around Kerem Shalom a military zone. The IDF has made – has moved forces in to police that crossing to ensure that it can stay open so much-needed humanitarian assistance, including humanitarian assistance that was supplied by the United States, can continue to flow into Rafah. And we think that’s important to do it. It is extremely unfortunate that, at times, that crossing has been blocked. We have engaged with the Israeli Government and made clear that it is the position of the United States that it ought to be – that it ought to remain open and they ought to take whatever steps they can to make sure that it remains open. And we’re glad that they have taken those steps. QUESTION: (Inaudible.) MR MILLER: Go ahead. Go. I’ll come to you next, Said. QUESTION: Thank you and good afternoon, sir. MR MILLER: Yeah. QUESTION: I have a couple questions on Gaza. It’s been over two weeks since Israeli forces attacked Hind Rajab’s family, killing her aunt, uncle, and cousins, leaving her trapped alone in her vehicle. We heard her pleas to the Red Crescent Society. Two medics were sent, all to be blown up, allegedly by Israeli forces. I wanted to ask about the status of the inquiry into this just because it seems if the Israeli Government, which seemingly does have a pretty sophisticated operation, is prioritizing this – if they don’t already know which soldiers to interview, for instance, they have Red Crescent calls, timestamps, the location of the Red Crescent staff to question and rely on, planning material to figure out who exactly to inquire with and to figure out who to hold accountable. So I want to first ask about the status of this investigation. MR MILLER: Sure. So I think that question is appropriately directed to the Government of Israel. I will say, on behalf of the United States, we have made clear to them that we want that incident to be investigated. They have told us they are investigating it. It’s our understanding that investigation is not yet complete. You should direct questions to them about where it stands. But we want to see it completed as soon as possible, and as I said from this podium several days ago, if accountability is appropriate, we want to be – we want to see accountability put in place. QUESTION: And then a follow-up to that before the second one. Just similarly, with regards to Al Jazeera cameraman Samer Abudaqa being left to bleed out while Israeli forces reportedly stopped medics from reaching him, I know that previously you have said there’s investigations into that. Is there any updates on that investigation? MR MILLER: I don’t have – I don’t have any update on that. Again, we press the Government of Israel on these matters but – and at times I have – I’m able to comment on specific incidents from here where we’ve gotten answers. But ultimately, those are questions better directed to the Government of Israel. QUESTION: Thank you. Okay, and then the last question. MR MILLER: Go ahead. QUESTION: As you’ve said repeatedly, the U.S. chose to be cautious as it suspended funding to UNRWA for allegations that 12 of its 30,000-person staff may have been involved in the atrocities on October 7th. And as you described yesterday, that’s kind of standard U.S. policy to have this type of caution with all sorts of entities. But as our colleagues have asked you over the please few months, there have been broad and specific human rights violations that we’ve been concerned about, human – attacks against hospitals and churches; targeting people with white flags, both Israeli hostages and Palestinians; torturing Palestinians; and now, of course, this attack on Hind Rajab’s family and then leaving her to die horribly. And so I’m wondering, on all this you’ve said we’re looking into it and Israel is investigating. But in each of these cases, the U.S. doesn’t seem to be as cautious with its money and support as it is with UNRWA. It’s to the point that the ICJ and the U.S. court both say Israel may be plausibly committing genocide. Still, U.S. money is coming while the U.S. shut off UNRWA funding immediately. So I’m just wondering if you could explain that sort of difference. MR MILLER: Let me say there is, I think, a false equivalency embedded in that question between members of a terrorist organization who went out and intentionally killed innocent civilians. QUESTION: Right, right. MR MILLER: This – no, that is the difference. When you have members of Hamas who participated in October 7th according to the allegations made by the Government of Israel, that I should say UNRWA itself found credible – those are allegations that UNRWA found credible of people intentionally participating in a terrorist action to murder civilians. That is different than a military campaign conducted in an environment where that terrorist organization hides behind human shields. And so we will continue to engage with the Government of Israel about how to minimize civilian casualties – there have been far too many over the course of this campaign – and how to prevent civilians from killed. But I think they are very different matters for the reasons I just articulated. Said. QUESTION: Just a follow-up to – MR MILLER: Let me – Said, go ahead. QUESTION: Thank you. MR MILLER: Because I’m going to have to – I’m going to have to wrap in a minute to go to a meeting, so — QUESTION: Thank you. Secretary Antony Blinken spoke yesterday about hostage diplomacy, and as an international security threat and so on. I want to ask you, the Israelis have arrested roughly 5,000 Palestinians from the West Bank – not in Gaza, from the West Bank. Almost none of them have been charged with anything since October. No charges. What do you call this? I mean, they come in the middle of the night. They take young men and women and so on. Many are children, as a matter of fact: 12, 13, 14 years old and so on. Isn’t this really something that a government, in this case, leveraging – leveraging the taking of people, incarcerating them out any charges, for maybe a future kind of a bargaining chip? MR MILLER: So I’ll say two things about that: number one, that we want to see due process for those individuals, as we want to see for anyone; and number two, we will continue to encourage Israel not to take any steps that can increase tensions in the West Bank. Let me go to Ksenija and then I’ll come back to you, and then I got to wrap because I do have a meeting. Sorry to – quick wrap today. Go ahead, Ksenija. QUESTION: Thank you so much, Matt. So we say in this room that the word of the United States matter. But despite this, Prime Minister of Kosovo Albin Kurti has not been responding to the words, as you’re aware, of the United States to suspend his decisions, unilateral decisions. Immediately you had even James O’Brien going on record yesterday (inaudible) is happening. So besides words, what other tools do you intend to use next to compel Kurti to stop with his unilateral actions given that, in the end of the day, this is a question that concern the U.S. taxpayer? MR MILLER: So I will say that we will continue to engage in diplomacy to resolve and – to resolve this matter, and we want both sides to return to the EU-facilitated dialogue. And beyond that, I don’t want to preview any specific steps from here. Shaun. QUESTION: And can you just say about — MR MILLER: Shaun – I’m going to – only because I have to wrap and I said, Shaun, I’d go to — QUESTION: Albania is tomorrow. MR MILLER: What’s that? QUESTION: Albania is tomorrow. I just want to ask if Secretary Blinken in Albania is going to talk to Prime Minister Edi Rama — MR MILLER: The — QUESTION: — about Kosovo issue in order — MR MILLER: So let me just say — QUESTION: — to compel him to reason with Kurti. MR MILLER: — whatever the Secretary is going to say to the prime minister, I think I’ll wait and let him say it privately to them. He does have a press conference in Albania afterwards where he’ll talk about that meeting, so please tune in to that. Shaun, go ahead and then I do have — QUESTION: Can I just follow up on a statement that you had earlier on the elections in Indonesia? MR MILLER: Yeah. QUESTION: I know it’s quite general, I know. In line with what you said about Pakistan – you’re not getting ahead of who is taking power – but Subianto has claimed victory in this. Of course, as you know, until recently he was barred from entering the United States on human rights ground – human rights grounds. I mean, that’s been resolved since. But do you think that there’s any lingering issue with – on human rights regarding a Subianto presidency? MR MILLER: So you’re right, we did say we would wait for the results to come in. It does appear that he’s received the most votes, but I don’t want to get ahead of the process that still needs to unfold, the official process in Indonesia. We are committed to the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Indonesia that we have had, and of course our 75 year diplomatic relationship with Indonesia, and we are prepared to work with whoever the Indonesian people choose as their democratically elected leader, whether it’s Subianto or – as it appears to be, President Subianto. QUESTION: Can I just very quickly — MR MILLER: Yeah. QUESTION: The other statement that you had on the call with the Algerian foreign minister. Do you know if there was discussion about the Security Council resolution that the Algerians are putting forward about a ceasefire? Did the Secretary say it’s not a good idea or some other message? MR MILLER: I don’t want to get into the private conversation other than what we already included in the readout. With that, sorry for the quick wrap but I do have to go, so wrap for today. Thanks, everyone. (The briefing was concluded at 1:35 p.m.) # # # |
| Serbia National Day |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 12:01 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the people of the United States, I want to congratulate the people of Serbia on the occasion of your Statehood Day. The United States values our strategic partnership with Serbia. We look forward to strengthening our bilateral ties and fostering a more stable, secure, and prosperous future for the Serbian and American people. We are committed to supporting your goal of European Union membership and we look forward to working with Serbia’s new government and our European partners to assist Serbia in meeting EU accession criteria. The United States encourages Serbia to implement its commitments and press ahead through the EU-facilitated dialogue to achieve a comprehensive normalization agreement with Kosovo. The United States looks forward to further economic, energy security, and defense cooperation with Serbia. We deeply appreciate your support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as they continue to resist Russia’s war of aggression. Serbia’s participation in UN and EU peacekeeping missions and deployment alongside U.S. forces in the Multinational Forces and Observers mission in the Sinai are examples of the invaluable role Serbia plays in strengthening peace and security regionally and globally. Finally, I offer my sincere congratulations on Serbia’s successful bid to host EXPO 27 in Belgrade and wish you success as you prepare for this extraordinary event. I wish the people of Serbia a peaceful and prosperous national day and year ahead. |
| Serbia National Day |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 12:01 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the people of the United States, I want to congratulate the people of Serbia on the occasion of your Statehood Day. The United States values our strategic partnership with Serbia. We look forward to strengthening our bilateral ties and fostering a more stable, secure, and prosperous future for the Serbian and American people. We are committed to supporting your goal of European Union membership and we look forward to working with Serbia’s new government and our European partners to assist Serbia in meeting EU accession criteria. The United States encourages Serbia to implement its commitments and press ahead through the EU-facilitated dialogue to achieve a comprehensive normalization agreement with Kosovo. The United States looks forward to further economic, energy security, and defense cooperation with Serbia. We deeply appreciate your support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as they continue to resist Russia’s war of aggression. Serbia’s participation in UN and EU peacekeeping missions and deployment alongside U.S. forces in the Multinational Forces and Observers mission in the Sinai are examples of the invaluable role Serbia plays in strengthening peace and security regionally and globally. Finally, I offer my sincere congratulations on Serbia’s successful bid to host EXPO 27 in Belgrade and wish you success as you prepare for this extraordinary event. I wish the people of Serbia a peaceful and prosperous national day and year ahead. |
| Serbia National Day |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 12:01 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the people of the United States, I want to congratulate the people of Serbia on the occasion of your Statehood Day. The United States values our strategic partnership with Serbia. We look forward to strengthening our bilateral ties and fostering a more stable, secure, and prosperous future for the Serbian and American people. We are committed to supporting your goal of European Union membership and we look forward to working with Serbia’s new government and our European partners to assist Serbia in meeting EU accession criteria. The United States encourages Serbia to implement its commitments and press ahead through the EU-facilitated dialogue to achieve a comprehensive normalization agreement with Kosovo. The United States looks forward to further economic, energy security, and defense cooperation with Serbia. We deeply appreciate your support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as they continue to resist Russia’s war of aggression. Serbia’s participation in UN and EU peacekeeping missions and deployment alongside U.S. forces in the Multinational Forces and Observers mission in the Sinai are examples of the invaluable role Serbia plays in strengthening peace and security regionally and globally. Finally, I offer my sincere congratulations on Serbia’s successful bid to host EXPO 27 in Belgrade and wish you success as you prepare for this extraordinary event. I wish the people of Serbia a peaceful and prosperous national day and year ahead. |
| U.S. Department of State Announces Reward Offers for Criminal Associates of The ALPHV/Blackcat Ransomware Variant |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 09:34 AM EST U.S. Department of State Announces Reward Offers for Criminal Associates of The ALPHV/Blackcat Ransomware VariantMedia Note February 15, 2024 Today, the Department of State is announcing reward offers of up to $10 million for information leading to the identification or location of anyone who holds a key leadership position in the Transnational Organized Crime (TOC) group behind the ALPHV/Blackcat Ransomware variant and up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest or conviction of anyone participating in or conspiring or attempting to participate in a ransomware attack using the ALPHV/Blackcat variant. Over 1,000 victim entities globally have been compromised by ALPHV/Blackcat actors. In December 2023, the Federal Bureau of Investigation disrupted ALPHV/Blackcat’s operations, through distributing a decryption tool developed by the FBI that assisted dozens of victims with restoring affected computer systems and saving victims from ransom demands totaling approximately $99 million. The reward offer complements the Department of Justice and the FBI’s recent announcement of cooperation with law enforcement agency groups from the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Spain, and Denmark, to launch a disruption campaign against the notorious ransomware gang ALPHV/Blackcat. Please direct information in response to the reward offer to the following Tor-based tip line (Tor browser required): he5dybnt7sr6cm32xt7 This reward is offered under the Department of State’s Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program (TOCRP), which supports law enforcement efforts to disrupt transnational crime globally and bring fugitives to justice. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian President Bajram Begaj Before Their Meeting |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:05 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Tirana, Albania President’s Office SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much, Mr. President. It’s a privilege. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: A great pleasure. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: This is very good that we can demonstrate that our strategic partnership is stronger than ever. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I could not agree more. Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I’m grateful about what you are doing for Albania, for Kosovo and in the region. And, of course, I cannot leave without mentioning that you have done so much for Albanian democracy, about rule of law, about justice reform, and in defense and security, and of course, in economy and education. And I can assure you that Albania is committed to be always with you, and of course, we’ll be a contributor to the regional and global security. SECRETARY BLINKEN: We see that every day. This is a partnership, and we’re grateful for it. We know that so many of the challenges each of us has we can most effectively deal with together, not alone. And so for us to have the friendship, the partnership – it’s been 101 years of diplomatic relations, but the last few years in particular we’ve seen the strength of the partnership in so many different areas. So it’s a great pleasure. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: It’s a strong message that you are supporting Albania, Albanian foreign policy, and of course the future of Albania – its way to European unification. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Yes. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I am sure that – and I see this visit as a bright future for Albania and our partnership. Strategic partnership will be for more hundred years to come, so we will have time to celebrate. SECRETARY BLINKEN: It’s a very – a very good wish. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: Good. Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian President Bajram Begaj Before Their Meeting |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:05 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Tirana, Albania President’s Office SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much, Mr. President. It’s a privilege. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: A great pleasure. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: This is very good that we can demonstrate that our strategic partnership is stronger than ever. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I could not agree more. Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I’m grateful about what you are doing for Albania, for Kosovo and in the region. And, of course, I cannot leave without mentioning that you have done so much for Albanian democracy, about rule of law, about justice reform, and in defense and security, and of course, in economy and education. And I can assure you that Albania is committed to be always with you, and of course, we’ll be a contributor to the regional and global security. SECRETARY BLINKEN: We see that every day. This is a partnership, and we’re grateful for it. We know that so many of the challenges each of us has we can most effectively deal with together, not alone. And so for us to have the friendship, the partnership – it’s been 101 years of diplomatic relations, but the last few years in particular we’ve seen the strength of the partnership in so many different areas. So it’s a great pleasure. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: It’s a strong message that you are supporting Albania, Albanian foreign policy, and of course the future of Albania – its way to European unification. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Yes. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I am sure that – and I see this visit as a bright future for Albania and our partnership. Strategic partnership will be for more hundred years to come, so we will have time to celebrate. SECRETARY BLINKEN: It’s a very – a very good wish. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: Good. Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian President Bajram Begaj Before Their Meeting |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:05 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Tirana, Albania President’s Office SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much, Mr. President. It’s a privilege. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: A great pleasure. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: This is very good that we can demonstrate that our strategic partnership is stronger than ever. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I could not agree more. Thank you. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I’m grateful about what you are doing for Albania, for Kosovo and in the region. And, of course, I cannot leave without mentioning that you have done so much for Albanian democracy, about rule of law, about justice reform, and in defense and security, and of course, in economy and education. And I can assure you that Albania is committed to be always with you, and of course, we’ll be a contributor to the regional and global security. SECRETARY BLINKEN: We see that every day. This is a partnership, and we’re grateful for it. We know that so many of the challenges each of us has we can most effectively deal with together, not alone. And so for us to have the friendship, the partnership – it’s been 101 years of diplomatic relations, but the last few years in particular we’ve seen the strength of the partnership in so many different areas. So it’s a great pleasure. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: It’s a strong message that you are supporting Albania, Albanian foreign policy, and of course the future of Albania – its way to European unification. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Yes. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: And I am sure that – and I see this visit as a bright future for Albania and our partnership. Strategic partnership will be for more hundred years to come, so we will have time to celebrate. SECRETARY BLINKEN: It’s a very – a very good wish. PRESIDENT BEGAJ: Good. Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship” |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:33 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship”Remarks February 15, 2024 SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for what has truly been – truly been – a wonderful welcome to the land of the eagles. I can feel the warmth outside, but I can also feel the warmth in this room and every room I’ve already been in Tirana, and I can’t tell you how much I appreciate it. Fiori, thank you for your extraordinary leadership. I think it’s the most powerful evidence that one can see of the power of our youth and exchange programs. For me, being able to celebrate some of the impact of these programs with alumni and participants is a really important moment. To each and every one of you for all that you’re doing to strengthen ties between our countries, between Albania and the United States, thank you. To David Wisner for leading our embassy here in Tirana, including everything that the embassy is doing to connect our peoples in different ways; and last, but certainly not least, Mr. Prime Minister, Edi, it’s great to be here with you. It’s great to be here in a city that I know, in your past capacity as mayor, you did so much to make even more vibrant, not to mention more colorful. I’m grateful not just for that, but truly for the extraordinary partnership that we have. I have to say the prime minister is both an extraordinary leader and an extraordinary partner, and I can’t think of a time over the last three and a half years where we haven’t had a challenge that needed to be faced where the prime minister has not stood up, stood alongside us, and faced it together. And we’re grateful for it. Thank you. (Applause.) Now, it’s been noted that this place, this magnificent space, really embodies Albania’s trajectory since the end of the Cold War. As was noted, when this pyramid was built three and a half decades ago, it symbolized the past. It memorialized an autocrat who sent Albanians to labor camps and closed the country off from the rest of the world. Back then, if you were looking really hard, the only hint of a relationship between our countries was maybe a voice you heard on Voice of America on a hidden transistor radio, or maybe a smuggled can of Coca-Cola on a birthday. Now, look around us. This place is filled with light; it’s filled with activity. It houses cafes, classrooms, tech incubators. It’s not a relic to the past; it’s a powerful living symbol of the present and the future. Home to EducationUSA, where Albanians can learn about studying in the United States. And of course, it was renovated thanks in part to an investment from the Albanian American Development Foundation, showing how Albania and the United States are building that future together. Simply put, like this building, Albania has been transformed. Everywhere you look – and I even got a sense of this just driving in the streets today – you see energy. You feel optimism about the future, a future integrated with Europe, with the West, with the world. Last year, a record number of tourists visited Albania. The Albanian national team just qualified for the Euro Cup for the second time ever. And I understand the last time that that happened, which goes back to 2016, that was also, it was noted, the last time someone in my position as Secretary of State visited. Now, I’m not saying that there’s a connection between these events, but maybe I should come back during the Euro Cup finals and see – (applause). You’re also seeing powerful ties between our countries play out in so many different and new ways. Americans – young Americans and not so young Americans – are dancing the night away quite literally to Dua Lipa. The chief technology officer at OpenAI – and think about this for a second – one of the people who’s helping to shape some of the world’s most powerful emerging technologies is of course Mira Murati, born in Vlore. One of the best restaurants in my native city, New York, is an Albanian place that apparently serves a very outstanding (inaudible), which I have yet to experience for myself, but we’ll get there. But here’s the thing – and these examples are just examples of something much larger. Albania’s shift from closed to open wasn’t flipping a light switch. You all know this; very few things in life are that simple or that easy. Young people – young people like the people in this room, like each of you – brought about change. Young people are essential to continue the drive for Albania’s transformation and for Albania’s future. In this room, we have with us today journalists who are exposing corruption and holding leaders accountable; women entrepreneurs are turning ideas into successful businesses; civil society leaders working to protect Albania’s environment and to counter violent extremism, to make Albania more equitable and more inclusive. Now, some of you helped welcome Afghan families who were fleeing the Taliban, showing how you genuinely and powerfully uphold the commitment, the – the duty to care for the vulnerable. And I’m learning so much about that. I have to tell you, just a short while ago before coming here, I was at our embassy. And I had a chance to sit down with some Afghan families who had come out of Afghanistan, come here to Albania, and will soon go to the United States to start their new lives. That journey would not be possible without Albania. And it’s – (applause). It’s not just the fact that you’re welcoming our friends and partners from Afghanistan; it’s the way you do it that is so powerful. I’ll digress for a second just to tell you it was incredibly moving to me, among the Afghan refugees who were there (inaudible) coming to the United States were two parents, a husband and wife. And they have, I believe – I think it was five children, each of whom had been number one in their class at school. But then when the Taliban came back, the girls couldn’t go to school anymore. But the mother insisted that even without that, they find ways to continue learning, and they were able to do some things online when they had access to internet. Even when they didn’t, she found ways. And with that work, her twin daughters – 14 years old – who have just been here for a few months, they’ll be going on to the United States very soon. In the course of the last year – I guess they’ve been here for about a year – they both learned fluent English. Fourteen years old. They both had incredible visions of what they wanted to do with their lives, what they wanted to do with their future. One of the sisters wants to be in fashion, and she had designed the shirts that they were wearing. The other wanted to be in business, and I suggested that maybe they could actually work together and one of them could do fashion, the other could do business. But here’s the thing: You could see this extraordinary hope in their eyes about the future – hope that had been taken away by this incredibly dark chapter in Afghanistan, but hope that had been renewed and reborn because they were able to come here, go on to the United States, because of Albania. And I can’t tell you how grateful I am to you for the partnership that we’ve had in helping our friends from Afghanistan. (Applause.) Dea Rrozhanizani from here in Tirana is an alumna of one of our department’s most wonderful programs, TechGirls. She participated in the summer program, and some of you may have been involved in that. But it brings teenage girls to the United States, encourages them to pursue science and engineering careers. She created an app to fight gender-based violence, and the only reason she’s not with us today is because she’s studying computer science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dea had put it this way – she said this: I don’t close my eyes before problems; I tackle them – I don’t complain; I act. So that’s something I’m going to try to keep in mind myself, because it’s a very good lesson for the challenges we face every day. But that’s the point of the exchange programs that we’re so fortunate to be able to conduct. No country has a monopoly on good ideas. We want to learn from you, just as we hope there are maybe some things you can learn from us. It’s the connections between our people, the back and forth, that’s so powerful and that leads to so many amazing outcomes. I’ve had the great opportunity over the last 30 years, working for the United States Government in one way or another, to travel around the world. And one of the things I’ve discovered is this: Somewhere, someone has probably found – if not the solution – at least the beginning of the solution, the answer to a problem we’re trying to solve. But if that experience, if that understanding, if that insight isn’t shared, then we all have to start from the beginning again. The more we can connect, the more we can share experience, share ideas, and share insights, the better off we’re all going to be. The United States and Albania established formal diplomatic ties over a century ago. For almost half that period, our people were actually denied the chance to know one another, as the prime minister said. But with young people like you deepening the partnership between us, I know – I’m convinced – that the next century will see us make our countries and the world that we share just a little bit more stable, a little bit more secure, a little bit more prosperous, a little bit more filled with opportunity. You’re the ones who will be doing that. And to each and every one of you, I’m grateful and I can’t see – I can’t wait to see what you’re going to do with the future that we’ll build together. Thank you. (Applause.) |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship” |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:33 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship”Remarks February 15, 2024 SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for what has truly been – truly been – a wonderful welcome to the land of the eagles. I can feel the warmth outside, but I can also feel the warmth in this room and every room I’ve already been in Tirana, and I can’t tell you how much I appreciate it. Fiori, thank you for your extraordinary leadership. I think it’s the most powerful evidence that one can see of the power of our youth and exchange programs. For me, being able to celebrate some of the impact of these programs with alumni and participants is a really important moment. To each and every one of you for all that you’re doing to strengthen ties between our countries, between Albania and the United States, thank you. To David Wisner for leading our embassy here in Tirana, including everything that the embassy is doing to connect our peoples in different ways; and last, but certainly not least, Mr. Prime Minister, Edi, it’s great to be here with you. It’s great to be here in a city that I know, in your past capacity as mayor, you did so much to make even more vibrant, not to mention more colorful. I’m grateful not just for that, but truly for the extraordinary partnership that we have. I have to say the prime minister is both an extraordinary leader and an extraordinary partner, and I can’t think of a time over the last three and a half years where we haven’t had a challenge that needed to be faced where the prime minister has not stood up, stood alongside us, and faced it together. And we’re grateful for it. Thank you. (Applause.) Now, it’s been noted that this place, this magnificent space, really embodies Albania’s trajectory since the end of the Cold War. As was noted, when this pyramid was built three and a half decades ago, it symbolized the past. It memorialized an autocrat who sent Albanians to labor camps and closed the country off from the rest of the world. Back then, if you were looking really hard, the only hint of a relationship between our countries was maybe a voice you heard on Voice of America on a hidden transistor radio, or maybe a smuggled can of Coca-Cola on a birthday. Now, look around us. This place is filled with light; it’s filled with activity. It houses cafes, classrooms, tech incubators. It’s not a relic to the past; it’s a powerful living symbol of the present and the future. Home to EducationUSA, where Albanians can learn about studying in the United States. And of course, it was renovated thanks in part to an investment from the Albanian American Development Foundation, showing how Albania and the United States are building that future together. Simply put, like this building, Albania has been transformed. Everywhere you look – and I even got a sense of this just driving in the streets today – you see energy. You feel optimism about the future, a future integrated with Europe, with the West, with the world. Last year, a record number of tourists visited Albania. The Albanian national team just qualified for the Euro Cup for the second time ever. And I understand the last time that that happened, which goes back to 2016, that was also, it was noted, the last time someone in my position as Secretary of State visited. Now, I’m not saying that there’s a connection between these events, but maybe I should come back during the Euro Cup finals and see – (applause). You’re also seeing powerful ties between our countries play out in so many different and new ways. Americans – young Americans and not so young Americans – are dancing the night away quite literally to Dua Lipa. The chief technology officer at OpenAI – and think about this for a second – one of the people who’s helping to shape some of the world’s most powerful emerging technologies is of course Mira Murati, born in Vlore. One of the best restaurants in my native city, New York, is an Albanian place that apparently serves a very outstanding (inaudible), which I have yet to experience for myself, but we’ll get there. But here’s the thing – and these examples are just examples of something much larger. Albania’s shift from closed to open wasn’t flipping a light switch. You all know this; very few things in life are that simple or that easy. Young people – young people like the people in this room, like each of you – brought about change. Young people are essential to continue the drive for Albania’s transformation and for Albania’s future. In this room, we have with us today journalists who are exposing corruption and holding leaders accountable; women entrepreneurs are turning ideas into successful businesses; civil society leaders working to protect Albania’s environment and to counter violent extremism, to make Albania more equitable and more inclusive. Now, some of you helped welcome Afghan families who were fleeing the Taliban, showing how you genuinely and powerfully uphold the commitment, the – the duty to care for the vulnerable. And I’m learning so much about that. I have to tell you, just a short while ago before coming here, I was at our embassy. And I had a chance to sit down with some Afghan families who had come out of Afghanistan, come here to Albania, and will soon go to the United States to start their new lives. That journey would not be possible without Albania. And it’s – (applause). It’s not just the fact that you’re welcoming our friends and partners from Afghanistan; it’s the way you do it that is so powerful. I’ll digress for a second just to tell you it was incredibly moving to me, among the Afghan refugees who were there (inaudible) coming to the United States were two parents, a husband and wife. And they have, I believe – I think it was five children, each of whom had been number one in their class at school. But then when the Taliban came back, the girls couldn’t go to school anymore. But the mother insisted that even without that, they find ways to continue learning, and they were able to do some things online when they had access to internet. Even when they didn’t, she found ways. And with that work, her twin daughters – 14 years old – who have just been here for a few months, they’ll be going on to the United States very soon. In the course of the last year – I guess they’ve been here for about a year – they both learned fluent English. Fourteen years old. They both had incredible visions of what they wanted to do with their lives, what they wanted to do with their future. One of the sisters wants to be in fashion, and she had designed the shirts that they were wearing. The other wanted to be in business, and I suggested that maybe they could actually work together and one of them could do fashion, the other could do business. But here’s the thing: You could see this extraordinary hope in their eyes about the future – hope that had been taken away by this incredibly dark chapter in Afghanistan, but hope that had been renewed and reborn because they were able to come here, go on to the United States, because of Albania. And I can’t tell you how grateful I am to you for the partnership that we’ve had in helping our friends from Afghanistan. (Applause.) Dea Rrozhanizani from here in Tirana is an alumna of one of our department’s most wonderful programs, TechGirls. She participated in the summer program, and some of you may have been involved in that. But it brings teenage girls to the United States, encourages them to pursue science and engineering careers. She created an app to fight gender-based violence, and the only reason she’s not with us today is because she’s studying computer science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dea had put it this way – she said this: I don’t close my eyes before problems; I tackle them – I don’t complain; I act. So that’s something I’m going to try to keep in mind myself, because it’s a very good lesson for the challenges we face every day. But that’s the point of the exchange programs that we’re so fortunate to be able to conduct. No country has a monopoly on good ideas. We want to learn from you, just as we hope there are maybe some things you can learn from us. It’s the connections between our people, the back and forth, that’s so powerful and that leads to so many amazing outcomes. I’ve had the great opportunity over the last 30 years, working for the United States Government in one way or another, to travel around the world. And one of the things I’ve discovered is this: Somewhere, someone has probably found – if not the solution – at least the beginning of the solution, the answer to a problem we’re trying to solve. But if that experience, if that understanding, if that insight isn’t shared, then we all have to start from the beginning again. The more we can connect, the more we can share experience, share ideas, and share insights, the better off we’re all going to be. The United States and Albania established formal diplomatic ties over a century ago. For almost half that period, our people were actually denied the chance to know one another, as the prime minister said. But with young people like you deepening the partnership between us, I know – I’m convinced – that the next century will see us make our countries and the world that we share just a little bit more stable, a little bit more secure, a little bit more prosperous, a little bit more filled with opportunity. You’re the ones who will be doing that. And to each and every one of you, I’m grateful and I can’t see – I can’t wait to see what you’re going to do with the future that we’ll build together. Thank you. (Applause.) |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship” |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 01:33 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken at Youth and Alumni Event “Celebrating the Future of the U.S.-Albania Relationship”Remarks February 15, 2024 SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for what has truly been – truly been – a wonderful welcome to the land of the eagles. I can feel the warmth outside, but I can also feel the warmth in this room and every room I’ve already been in Tirana, and I can’t tell you how much I appreciate it. Fiori, thank you for your extraordinary leadership. I think it’s the most powerful evidence that one can see of the power of our youth and exchange programs. For me, being able to celebrate some of the impact of these programs with alumni and participants is a really important moment. To each and every one of you for all that you’re doing to strengthen ties between our countries, between Albania and the United States, thank you. To David Wisner for leading our embassy here in Tirana, including everything that the embassy is doing to connect our peoples in different ways; and last, but certainly not least, Mr. Prime Minister, Edi, it’s great to be here with you. It’s great to be here in a city that I know, in your past capacity as mayor, you did so much to make even more vibrant, not to mention more colorful. I’m grateful not just for that, but truly for the extraordinary partnership that we have. I have to say the prime minister is both an extraordinary leader and an extraordinary partner, and I can’t think of a time over the last three and a half years where we haven’t had a challenge that needed to be faced where the prime minister has not stood up, stood alongside us, and faced it together. And we’re grateful for it. Thank you. (Applause.) Now, it’s been noted that this place, this magnificent space, really embodies Albania’s trajectory since the end of the Cold War. As was noted, when this pyramid was built three and a half decades ago, it symbolized the past. It memorialized an autocrat who sent Albanians to labor camps and closed the country off from the rest of the world. Back then, if you were looking really hard, the only hint of a relationship between our countries was maybe a voice you heard on Voice of America on a hidden transistor radio, or maybe a smuggled can of Coca-Cola on a birthday. Now, look around us. This place is filled with light; it’s filled with activity. It houses cafes, classrooms, tech incubators. It’s not a relic to the past; it’s a powerful living symbol of the present and the future. Home to EducationUSA, where Albanians can learn about studying in the United States. And of course, it was renovated thanks in part to an investment from the Albanian American Development Foundation, showing how Albania and the United States are building that future together. Simply put, like this building, Albania has been transformed. Everywhere you look – and I even got a sense of this just driving in the streets today – you see energy. You feel optimism about the future, a future integrated with Europe, with the West, with the world. Last year, a record number of tourists visited Albania. The Albanian national team just qualified for the Euro Cup for the second time ever. And I understand the last time that that happened, which goes back to 2016, that was also, it was noted, the last time someone in my position as Secretary of State visited. Now, I’m not saying that there’s a connection between these events, but maybe I should come back during the Euro Cup finals and see – (applause). You’re also seeing powerful ties between our countries play out in so many different and new ways. Americans – young Americans and not so young Americans – are dancing the night away quite literally to Dua Lipa. The chief technology officer at OpenAI – and think about this for a second – one of the people who’s helping to shape some of the world’s most powerful emerging technologies is of course Mira Murati, born in Vlore. One of the best restaurants in my native city, New York, is an Albanian place that apparently serves a very outstanding (inaudible), which I have yet to experience for myself, but we’ll get there. But here’s the thing – and these examples are just examples of something much larger. Albania’s shift from closed to open wasn’t flipping a light switch. You all know this; very few things in life are that simple or that easy. Young people – young people like the people in this room, like each of you – brought about change. Young people are essential to continue the drive for Albania’s transformation and for Albania’s future. In this room, we have with us today journalists who are exposing corruption and holding leaders accountable; women entrepreneurs are turning ideas into successful businesses; civil society leaders working to protect Albania’s environment and to counter violent extremism, to make Albania more equitable and more inclusive. Now, some of you helped welcome Afghan families who were fleeing the Taliban, showing how you genuinely and powerfully uphold the commitment, the – the duty to care for the vulnerable. And I’m learning so much about that. I have to tell you, just a short while ago before coming here, I was at our embassy. And I had a chance to sit down with some Afghan families who had come out of Afghanistan, come here to Albania, and will soon go to the United States to start their new lives. That journey would not be possible without Albania. And it’s – (applause). It’s not just the fact that you’re welcoming our friends and partners from Afghanistan; it’s the way you do it that is so powerful. I’ll digress for a second just to tell you it was incredibly moving to me, among the Afghan refugees who were there (inaudible) coming to the United States were two parents, a husband and wife. And they have, I believe – I think it was five children, each of whom had been number one in their class at school. But then when the Taliban came back, the girls couldn’t go to school anymore. But the mother insisted that even without that, they find ways to continue learning, and they were able to do some things online when they had access to internet. Even when they didn’t, she found ways. And with that work, her twin daughters – 14 years old – who have just been here for a few months, they’ll be going on to the United States very soon. In the course of the last year – I guess they’ve been here for about a year – they both learned fluent English. Fourteen years old. They both had incredible visions of what they wanted to do with their lives, what they wanted to do with their future. One of the sisters wants to be in fashion, and she had designed the shirts that they were wearing. The other wanted to be in business, and I suggested that maybe they could actually work together and one of them could do fashion, the other could do business. But here’s the thing: You could see this extraordinary hope in their eyes about the future – hope that had been taken away by this incredibly dark chapter in Afghanistan, but hope that had been renewed and reborn because they were able to come here, go on to the United States, because of Albania. And I can’t tell you how grateful I am to you for the partnership that we’ve had in helping our friends from Afghanistan. (Applause.) Dea Rrozhanizani from here in Tirana is an alumna of one of our department’s most wonderful programs, TechGirls. She participated in the summer program, and some of you may have been involved in that. But it brings teenage girls to the United States, encourages them to pursue science and engineering careers. She created an app to fight gender-based violence, and the only reason she’s not with us today is because she’s studying computer science at the University of Pennsylvania. Dea had put it this way – she said this: I don’t close my eyes before problems; I tackle them – I don’t complain; I act. So that’s something I’m going to try to keep in mind myself, because it’s a very good lesson for the challenges we face every day. But that’s the point of the exchange programs that we’re so fortunate to be able to conduct. No country has a monopoly on good ideas. We want to learn from you, just as we hope there are maybe some things you can learn from us. It’s the connections between our people, the back and forth, that’s so powerful and that leads to so many amazing outcomes. I’ve had the great opportunity over the last 30 years, working for the United States Government in one way or another, to travel around the world. And one of the things I’ve discovered is this: Somewhere, someone has probably found – if not the solution – at least the beginning of the solution, the answer to a problem we’re trying to solve. But if that experience, if that understanding, if that insight isn’t shared, then we all have to start from the beginning again. The more we can connect, the more we can share experience, share ideas, and share insights, the better off we’re all going to be. The United States and Albania established formal diplomatic ties over a century ago. For almost half that period, our people were actually denied the chance to know one another, as the prime minister said. But with young people like you deepening the partnership between us, I know – I’m convinced – that the next century will see us make our countries and the world that we share just a little bit more stable, a little bit more secure, a little bit more prosperous, a little bit more filled with opportunity. You’re the ones who will be doing that. And to each and every one of you, I’m grateful and I can’t see – I can’t wait to see what you’re going to do with the future that we’ll build together. Thank you. (Applause.) |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press Availability |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 03:53 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press AvailabilityRemarks February 15, 2024 PRIME MINISTER RAMA: (Via interpreter) Dearest U.S. State Secretary, dear Tony, it’s always a remarkable day of special meaning in the history of Albania’s international relations, the day when a U.S. state secretary visits our country. Well, in our books you are the sixth state secretary visiting, but this time we have a special appreciation of this visit, as we are very much aware of the troubled times happening not only in the European world but also in other areas of strategic importance for the global balances. Consequently, actually this is something that adds especially to the burden of your agenda. The very fact that you found time and saw it necessary to stop in Tirana is, to us, a very important sign of our friendship but also of your appreciation of this friendship, of this partnership, and of course, the appreciation of this region. Well, I cannot help but share with the public the regret that between a dinner with us in Albania and a dinner in Munich, where you have to depart quite immediately, you chose the not-so-tasteful German food. Well, we did our best. Our dinner was ready. We are highly honored by the visit of the state secretary today, and I could say without any diplomatic or any protocol embellishment that I am very pleased with our open, deep conversation and the level of interaction and understanding between us. I feel very pleased that your visit coincides with Albania’s – at conclusion of its mission in the UN secretary – in the UN Security Council. And in addition to extending my thanks to the state secretary, the gratitude for the invaluable support we had from the United States and its mission at the United Nations, their support of our presence in the council and the support to our success in the course of the two years where we were not permanent members of the UN Security Council. I also extended my gratitude for the very touching message that the United States ambassador in the United Nations shared for the high appraisal she actually made for the work of the Albanian team, for the very positive notes and words she shared with the public on the way in which Albania managed to represent itself, but even more than that, the way in which Albania managed to represent this community of countries and states that stand together for some values and principles that are non-negotiable to us. On the other hand, I wish to thank the state secretary publicly also for another support that maybe is not so much talked about, and it’s not so visible, but it’s a constant, important, and useful support for Albania to progress on its path towards EU accession. Clearly, this is a process that depends on what we do; it also depends on the assessment and judgment of our allies in the European Union. But since some years now, we have remarkably felt the constant interest of the U.S. administration, and in particular the continuous interest shown by the State Department, and the fact that in his important meetings with European allies, the state secretary always underscores the need to push further the integration process for Albania and Western Balkans in the EU as a strategic interest of the United States. On the other hand, we spoke about the region. We shared the same perspectives and concerns. As you know, Albania has a policy of an extended friendship hand for all the countries of the region, and we are interested and wanting that the region moves ahead as a whole, because first and foremost is – it is in our strategic interest. It is in the interest of our people to see its integration with Europe as an integral part of the integration of this region around values and principles that embody our being part of the large community of democratic states and countries. We have encouraged, we encourage, and will continue to encourage the irreplaceable dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. The United States have been our and will be the staunch supporters of the process for the final recognition of Kosovo and to meet the international subjectivity of Kosovo. And it is actually better for all Albanians and also Albanians in Kosovo to be reminded – remember that without the United States there would not be an independent state of Kosovo, and that the interest of the United States in this region, and specifically the interest of the United States for things to run smoothly in Albania and Kosovo, is not a secondhand interest. It is neither an interest that is separate in any respect from our interest in Albania and Kosovo to build a peaceful and prosperous future for the next generations. It is unquestionable – so there is no doubt that we actually feel regret any time we witness steps back. Of course, we are aware of the difficulties of the dialogue. There is no doubt that we are cognizant of the wounds of a not so past strategy of – a tragedy of those who live in Kosovo. And we are also aware that in certain points in time, such as the terrorist attack in Banjska, Serbia does not always help the process as it should. But first and foremost, Albanians of Kosovo and all of us must be conscious that it is in our interest, it is in the interest of Kosovo, to progress even unilaterally, should the need arise, to meet all those requests put on the table of dialogue that are not restrictive demands. They are neither demands for Kosovo to give up a single millimeter of its dignity, of its sovereignty, and of its future. These are requirements or demands that through their delivery ensure the establishment of a context that elevates the Republic of Kosovo as a republic that deserves all the support, all the support and also the trust of our strategic partners, without whom the future becomes even more remote and the present becomes even more complicated. So even today, after we discussed and talked, I want to repeat our appeal, my appeal, for the authorities in Pristina not to take any steps without consulting and being coordinated with our strategic allies because it is first and foremost in their interest, and of course it is in the interest of our alliance. Actions that are not consulted and uncoordinated could perhaps gain some votes for the moment, turning the foreign policy into a tool and function of the domestic policy. But there is no long-term gain. On the other hand, we discussed about the dimensions of our bilateral cooperation, with the latter not only being a constant strategic operation in the area of security, but it is also a cooperation that is increasingly gaining an economic dimension. While it is unquestionable the need and importance of U.S. investments in Albania as a testament not only of this relationship but also of the awareness of the large potential Albania has in critical sectors for the world today and for our region, for example, like the energy sector. The U.S. administration is highly engaged in working to tackle the climate challenge, and it is highly committed to supporting all the programs and projects of green energy. And we believe that in this respect, U.S. companies are a desired partner, and we hope that this process that has already kicked off will progress further. Equally so, we believe that Albania is a country – and the Secretary actually is a witness of this himself – this is a country that the U.S. tourists actually can visit because it’s worth it. As differently from the United States or other countries, in a very small country without going hours of distance, one can find everything, all the natural beauties, ranging from the beaches to the mountains full of snow. By way of concluding, last by not least, I wish to publicly thank the state secretary for what we’ve been discussing again and again in all our meeting. And something that we repeated in our meeting as well that is the irreplaceable support to transform Albania from a country that had never justice and where the impunity culture was the norm, that made the citizens of the country, from the establish of the Albanian state, that it would never be possible in this country for the law to be actually equal for everyone, and so that no one could be above the law. They made it possible for us to see today that even in Albania, just like in every country that is ambitious for their own children, it is possible that people in office, also people who are also part of the current executive power, could actually be called accountable before the law for breaching the law. This is something whose weight and importance Albania will be able to fully perceive many years later. But there is something we know even now: that when we started the reform in justice and we received the support of our allies, all the polls and questionnaires of the public on the reform saw an overwhelming support, irrespective of the political affiliations and irrespective of the typical and tradition polarization of politics; either left- or right-wing supporters or those who are not affiliated with any parties, support this reform in justice. It is no secret, Mr. Secretary, that here we have a problem. We can’t find a consensus even on time. If you ask anyone on what the time is, we have a left wing time, a right wing time, and we have also a central time. However, when it came to the question whether those who supported the reform in justice believed that they would be able to see in their lifetime important people going before the justice, the majority answered with a no. Well, here we are today. We are living in a time where the myth of impunity and the myth of the powerful above the law has been debunked. Of course, there is a lot of work that remains to be done. We talked about the challenges. We talked about the advancement of the reform. We talked about how imperative it is to counter the phenomenon of corruption as a phenomenon that must be looked at from the perspective of the integration process with all its aspects as well. But if there is a reason, an important reason today to be more convinced than ever of the value of this partnership, of the value of this friendship, this reason is the commitment of our strategic partners to offering support and assistance to change a chapter of the history of Albania that seemed to be unchangeable throughout a lifetime and for all the generations. Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. Thank you very much. Tony, the floor is yours. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Prime Minister, Edi, thank you so much for welcoming us here today, and not just welcoming us – the warmth, the hospitality, the substance, directness, frankness of our conversations – something I always deeply appreciate. I’m going to start with two expressions that we have. One is the expression “rain check.” So if you miss out on someone’s hospitality, if you miss out on a kind invitation to dinner, you ask for a rain check. So I’m asking for a rain check, if you’ll have me back. Second is another expression we have and that is the notion of a “fair weather friend.” That’s a friend who’s with you when the sun is shining but not when the rain is coming down. Albania is not only a fair weather friend, it’s also a foul weather friend – together, even when the going is tough, even when we’re facing challenges. And that’s something I can’t begin to tell you how much we appreciate and value. And it’s a tribute to this country and the friendship we have, and it’s a tribute to the prime minister, who is an extraordinary partner for the United States. I’m here on my first visit as Secretary to Albania because this partnership between our two countries is stronger than it’s ever been. And the relationship for us is vital to addressing so many issues that matter to our people. This is a two-way street, and we are doing things with each other and for each other that are to the benefit of people here in Albania and in the United States and beyond, I would argue. As a key NATO Ally, a powerful voice on the UN Security Council – and you heard the prime minister allude to this – we had a really extraordinary partnership during the two years that Albania was a non‑permanent member of the council, and that was reflected in the message the prime minister referenced from our ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield. We did, I think, very, very important and strong work together, particularly holding the pen together on the question of Ukraine and the Russian aggression, something we deeply value; now a new member of the Human Rights Council, and also playing a growing role in other critical international institutions, including UNESCO. This is consequential not just for Albania, not just for the region, not just for Europe; it’s actually consequential for the world, and we deeply, deeply appreciate it. We had the opportunity today to discuss a lot of issues and challenges that we’re facing together, and we focused first on what we’re doing to promote our shared security. As you know, Albania has been from day one a strong supporter of Ukraine – really the first to step up, to raise its hand. It was one of the first countries to send military aid to Ukraine in the wake of the Russian aggression – guns, ammunition, mine resistant vehicles – and it’s currently one of the top ten per capita in terms of its support for Ukraine and security assistance. The prime minister said this at the Security Council last September, and I’m going to – Edi, if I can, I’m going to quote you: “The struggle of Ukraine is also the struggle of everyone who aspires to live in a world where nations are free and equal, where territorial integrity is indisputable, and right to live in peace is unquestionable.” It’s hard to think of a more elegant way to put what’s at stake in Ukraine. Over its 15 years now in NATO, Albania has made significant contributions to our alliance. Albanian troops are helping to keep the peace in Kosovo to deter Russian aggression on NATO’s eastern flank. Next month, Albania will inaugurate a NATO airbase in Kucove. Our 31 Allies, soon to be 32 Allies, bring different histories, different experiences, different geographies, different capabilities. But each of us has the same ironclad commitment to our mutual defense, and each of us makes important contributions and sacrifices. In the last three years alone, virtually every Ally has increased defense spending as a percentage of its GDP. Together, our collective strength is much more than the sum of our parts. It’s an enduring investment in shared security, shared prosperity, and in the principles that join us together. We’re grateful that Albania is doing its part, prepared to continue to do its part. We’re fully committed to upholding our obligations as well. Our countries are also growing our bilateral security partnership. Albanians and Americans have fought side by side from Afghanistan to Iraq. Albanian pilots fly American-made Blackhawks. U.S. Special Forces are training their Albanian counterparts and helping to keep watching the Balkans. In the wake of the recent Iranian cyber attacks targeting Albanian critical infrastructure, the United States has supported Albania cyber defenses, helping to train experts, to upgrade equipment, to improve technology so that they’re more resilient to future attacks. I thank the Prime Minister as well for something that is near and dear to my heart, and near and dear to the hearts of so many Americans, and that is the extraordinary generosity that the Albanian people have shown in welcoming thousands of Afghan evacuees. Albania was the very first country to do so. I had a chance a little bit earlier today to meet with some of the most recent evacuees from Afghanistan who will be going on to the United States. They’re getting their Special Immigrant Visas, and then they’ll come to be part of the next chapter in the story of the United States. These are people who have endured incredible hardship, who’ve shown remarkable courage. And what I heard from them today was not just gratitude for being welcomed here, Mr. Prime Minister, in Albania, but the way they were welcomed by the Albanian people: with extraordinary warmth and support. And it’s hard to – it’s hard to describe how much that means to people like our Afghan colleagues and friends who are in the midst of the most uprooting experience possible. We’re committed to resettling them in America, offering them a similarly warm welcome, but I have to say we’re really inspired by the way that you’ve done it. The prime minister and I also discussed how to keep making Albania’s democratic institutions more accountable to Albania’s citizens. Justice reform has not been easy, perfect, or quick, but it is showing real results, and you heard the prime minister describe them. Today I met with key judges and prosecutors who are helping to lead the reform effort. Corrupt officials are being held accountable. Members of organized crime are going to prison and losing their assets. So this is a very powerful process, but it’s a process, and it continues to move forward. We’ll continue to strongly support Albania in these efforts, which are critical steps toward Albania joining the European Union and what the people in Albania deserve. Our democracies are also threatened, both of us, by disinformation. And that fuels division and it erodes trust. We just signed with the foreign minister memorandums of understanding, and the one that we signed a moment ago will enable the United States and Albania to develop a shared approach to countering dangerous distortions and lies and build a resilient information ecosystem. There is an information competition, even an information war, that goes on day in, day out. And it’s critical that democracies have the tools that they need to act effectively in dealing with it. We also discussed ways to further strengthen our economic relations, again, as the prime minister said. American investment in Albania has tripled since 2019, and it will only grow more as the business climate continues to improve. Our companies are exploring hydropower, wind, solar projects in Albania. These have great potential to diversify Albanian energy resources and sources to help our shared planet and to create inclusive economic growth for everyone. Finally, we committed to deepening ties between our people. Edi and I just came from a really terrific gathering at the Pyramid just a few doors away from here, where I met some of the young people who are participating in our exchange programs – their alumni and current participants. These programs are making the bonds between us stronger every single day. So the other memorandum of understanding that we signed for the Fulbright Program will double the number of Albanians who can study on scholarships in the United States, bringing our people even more closely together. One of my predecessors who I see on the wall here to my left, Secretary James Baker, famously told the Albanian people, and I quote, “You are with us and we are with you.” That was true three decades ago. It remains true today. It will remain true tomorrow. Thank you, Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Thank you. MODERATOR: Prime Minister and Secretary of State, there are some questions from the journalists for you. First question is from Muhamed Veliu from Top Channel Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) I – a joint question. Dear Mr. Secretary, you just mentioned that Kucove Base is going to be inaugurated one month later, whereas Prime Minister Edi Rama has offered Albania’s readiness and continues meetings in NATO and here to have a maritime base for NATO in Durres Port. Did you discuss about this matter in your bilateral meetings today? And is there any progress, if any? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. Well, in fact, I had an opportunity to meet with a number of different people and different groups besides the prime minister, foreign minister, members of the cabinet, as I mentioned. I also met with some of the leading judges and prosecutors who are leading the judicial reform effort. I had a chance to meet with some, as I mentioned, remarkable young people who are engaged in our exchange programs. And when I come back for my rain check for dinner, I’ll look forward to meeting an even broader cross section of Albanian society and all of the different actors. But we, I think, got a lot into this day – something I take great satisfaction in. With regard to the air base, first, I think it’s important to underscore a couple of things. One, it’s now 15 years since Albania has been a NATO Ally. And the fact that we’ll be inaugurating – you’ll be inaugurating the air base in Kucove in just a few weeks is a wonderful way to highlight and underscore the commitment that Albania has made to NATO and that NATO, of course, has to Albania. This is a very strong example of the defense partnership that we enjoy. When it comes to the question of a maritime base, yes, this is something that we discussed and that I very much look forward to pursuing through NATO and through the processes that NATO has to determine what future assets would be valuable to the Alliance. And we discussed this, and I know that NATO will work on it. MODERATOR: Next question is from Olivia Gazis from CBS. QUESTION: (Off-mike.) SECRETARY BLINKEN: Edi, is there anything you wanted to add? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: I don’t think that I was also involved, but – (laughter) – but as you know, when he’s not here, what I say is like he’s saying it. And now that he’s said it, what can I say more? (Laughter.) QUESTION: Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, information has emerged about a serious national security threat from Russia with lawmakers of both parties in the United States pressing for a response from the administration. How would you characterize, first, the urgency of the threat in question, and secondly, the United States current preparedness to confront it? And secondly on Gaza, what is the United States level of confidence right now that negotiating parties can achieve an agreement that pauses hostilities before the beginning of Ramadan on March 10th? And Mr. Prime Minister, on Ukraine, the Secretary referenced Albania’s significant contributions. The U.S. Congress has struggled for months now to pass a significant aid package for the Ukrainians, even as Kyiv is entering its third year of war with Russia. Do you believe that this indicates American support for Ukraine is waning and do you see it undermining broader Western efforts to push back against Moscow? And secondly, if I may, Mr. Prime Minister, on NATO, given recent statements by the Republican presidential frontrunner in the United States, do you have confidence that America will uphold its commitments to NATO’s collective defense pact no matter what members’ defense spending levels are and no matter what the outcome is in November? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Olivia. So on the first question, there’s not much that I can say right now on the underlying issue. What I can say is this: This is not an active capability, but it is a potential one that we’re taking very, very seriously. And I would expect that we’ll have more to say soon – in fact, very soon – so stay tuned for that. And, of course, we’re also conferring with allies and partners on this issue. But here’s the most important thing of all: The President’s focus, President Biden’s focus, is on the security of the United States and its people. And as we approach this and every other issue, that is first and foremost what’s on his mind. That’s where his focus is. On the question of hostages, so as you know, we put forward a proposal to Hamas that the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, working with Israel, had had put together and then, as I said, put forward. We received a response from Hamas about a week ago, a response that we believe, while it has, as I said at the time, a number of clear nonstarters in it, also offers the possibility of working toward an agreement. We’re now in the process with our counterparts from Qatar, from Egypt, from Israel in working on that and working very intensely on that with the goal of trying to find an agreement. And I believe that it is possible. Now, as I said, there are some very, very hard issues that have to be resolved, but we’re committed to doing everything we can to move forward and to see if we can reach an agreement. We know what success looks like. We had it when we secured the first agreement that resulted in the release of 105 hostages, that resulted in a pause in military operations, the substantial expansion of humanitarian assistance going into people who so desperately needed it. If an agreement can be reached here, it offers the prospect, of course, doing what is at the top of our list, which is getting the hostages home to their families, but also having an extended pause, which offers many other benefits as well. So we’re very focused on it, and I believe it’s possible. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: You are tricking me into something that I am afraid might be dangerous, because answering to your question, I have to melt in American politics, which is not very advisable when you are a friend with United States. But I want to take advantage from your presence to invite you, maybe through your TV, to share with the American public a map of Mongolia. Following Mr. Putin’s interview and his reasoning on the legitimacy of attacking Ukraine that went back to 9th century – but if you dig a bit more, you’ll discover that Russia once upon a time was within the borders of Mongolia. So I know that Mongolians are a peaceful people, but I don’t think that – looking back to the maps and using history like a reason to attack other people, to take others’ lives, to destroy others’ houses, to break others’ future, is a quite insane exercise. And being in that in that situation, Ukraine couldn’t survive so far without the United States, first and foremost, and all the other allies and friends who, by the way, are not eager to enter in war with Russia or with whomever, but have to protect Ukraine for protecting the world they believe in. Now, if you want me to have a take on the American Congress and Senate, I think I should not go there, because let’s say that the American politics nowadays is not at its best. But one thing I can say, I had the privilege to be prime minister for Albania in NATO when the former president was there. And despite the rhetoric, despite the colorful way to confront adversaries, I don’t see that NATO was weakened. On the contrary, what was decided before continued to be the case. Every country continued to put more money and to put more effort in increasing the NATO budget. So now, elections are elections, Trump is Trump. American politics is American politics. But I think United States is something more than that. And what makes United States one of a kind in the – in our community of countries and of people all around the world is that United States cannot and will never, in my view, shy away from what are the principles and the values to be protected, whatever it takes. And so I’m not afraid of anything, but of stopping or wavering to continue and protect ourselves through protecting the right of Ukrainians to live in their country, to have their own house intact, to have their children grow there, and to have a common future with everyone else, without being threatened to be wiped out from maps based on ninth, thirteenth, fifteenth, whatever century. Because if this Pandora box opens then I can tell you we have a lot of maps in this region, but we have to see the future, and it’s only the future that will unite us. So no, I don’t think that NATO will be weakened. I don’t think the United States will shy away from their role and from their leadership. I then that when elections will be over, American business is American business. MODERATOR: Next question is from Elja Zotka, journalist of Klan Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Mr. Secretary, you did not touch upon the region and Kosovo in your remarks. Therefore, I wish to ask specifically a question about Kosovo. What is your view of the latest developments in Kosovo? How do you see the steps that have been taken in the dialogue with Serbia? Also the removal of dinar as the currency – do you see it as concerning, and also the fact that there is no steps being taken to establishing the associations? Well, Mr. Prime Minister, you already gave an answer, but I don’t know whether you’ve had – you have something to add when it comes to the situation in Kosovo. A second question for Mr. Secretary, if it is possible. You mentioned that you had a meeting with the heads of the justice institutions, and justice is a matter close to our heart as a people, because we’ve been missing it so far. Could you specifically speak about the message you imparted to the heads of our justice institutions on behalf of the U.S. in your although very brief meeting? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. When I started out working at the State Department and at the White House, now I’m afraid to say more than 30 years ago, the issue, the question, the challenge that was front and center – this is during President Clinton’s administration – was the Balkans, first Bosnia and Herzegovina, then Kosovo. And so many of us have a long and deep history, no one more so than the President of the United States, President Biden. And I think you know that history well. And so we’re strongly animated by the notion that we can’t go back to the future. We can’t have a repeat of what we saw and what too many people experienced in the 1990s, which is why we’re committed to supporting all of the efforts to advance the integration of countries in the Western Balkans, with each other and with Europe. With regard to Kosovo and Serbia more specifically, the EU-facilitated dialogue is the right – in fact, I think the only – path forward. And we’re committed to doing what we can to support both countries as they travel that path. But I also have to applaud Albania’s role in being a force for regional stability, for regional integration, for regional progress. That is the path that so clearly brings everyone to a better future. And we know what the alternative is because we’ve experienced it, we’ve seen it. So we’re resolute in doing everything we can in support of all the countries in the region taking that path. We very much support, as I said, the EU-facilitated dialogue. And we’ll work with Albania and others to try to help countries advance along that path. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Ditto. MODERATOR: Any comment? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: No, no, no. Ditto. MODERATOR: Next question is from Alexander Marquardt, CNN. QUESTION: Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, you just said a moment ago that you think that a deal is possible, a humanitarian pause and a hostage deal. After the meeting that took place earlier this week in Cairo, do you think that that deal and a pause could be reached before Israel launches its expected offensive into Rafah? Do you think Prime Minister Netanyahu favors that Rafah offensive over reaching a hostage deal and a humanitarian pause? And then separately, two teenage American boys have now been killed in the West Bank in the past few weeks. An American woman was detained by Israeli forces in the West Bank. Two young American men were also detained by Israeli forces in Gaza. Have those detainees gotten U.S. consular access? Do you even know where those detainees are? And when it comes to the investigations into the teenagers’ deaths, where do those stand? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, Alex. QUESTION: And Mr. Secretary, may I ask the prime minister also a question? Albania recognized Palestine in 1988. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said earlier today that now is not the time to be speaking about gifts for the Palestinian people. Do you think that a two-state solution is still possible with the current Israeli Government, and how do you and the U.S. think that is achievable? Thank you both. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Alex. So look, on the first question, I’m obviously not going to be speaking for the prime minister or telling you what his views may or may not be on these questions. You’ll have to ask him yourself or have others ask him. All I can tell you is this. As I said to Olivia’s question, we believe it must be and must remain a priority to do everything we can to bring the hostages home, to get them back with their loved ones, and that’s where our focus is. We’ve done a lot of work to try to get back to this point; that is where we think an agreement is possible, even if it – even if difficult. And at least from the perspective of the United States, we think it’s imperative that we continue to pursue that urgently. And as I said, that would bring many other benefits with it, and notably an extended pause to the conflict, an extended expansion of humanitarian assistance, all things that would be very, very welcome – more than welcome – by men, women, and children in Gaza who continue to suffer every single day. So that’s where our focus is, but in terms of timing, how one thing fits with another, you’ll have to ask the prime minister. Edi. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Yes. QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, on the detainees — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Oh, I’m sorry. Yes, on the detainees – or this question – well, two things. First, with regard to American citizens who reportedly were killed, the first thing I would say is our deepest condolences to the families, to the loved ones, to the friends. You’ve heard me say this before, the President feels the same say: the safety, the security of American citizens around the world is our number one priority, our number one responsibility. And we’ve made clear that with regard to the instance you alluded to, there needs to be an investigation. We need to get the facts and, if appropriate, there needs to be accountability. With regard to detainees, there is a limit to what I can say because of the privacy laws and the requirements that flow from that. But I can just say in general, without reference to specific cases, we insist that people be treated fairly, that they be treated with due process, and that they be treated humanely. And that’s something that, regardless of where an American citizen might be detained, we insist on and will continue to insist on. Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: It’s in my humble view the hardest (inaudible) one can get. And the answer straightforward to your question: yes, Albania has recognized Palestine long ago. To give you a little background, Albania was a communist dictatorship, and our dictator was one of the closest friends and allies of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, PLO, and of Yasser Arafat. And on the other hand, our regime was very viciously against three major devils – United States, Soviet Union, and Israel, so in other words, American imperialism, Soviet social imperialism, and Jewish Zionism. But this country, on the other hand, is the only country in Europe that had more Jews after the Second World War than before, and it’s the only country where Jews didn’t fly out, but flew in to be protected. And as it is very well shown in Yad Vashem, it’s a country where the Nazis didn’t succeed to get a single Jew. This is the background. Now, of course, the situation is tragic because on one hand, Israel has its legitimate right to defend itself, but on the other hand, the destroyal and the loss of life on the Palestinian side are far too much to accept the escalation, the further escalation. And the trouble is that this further escalation is not an action that, at the end, by itself will wipe out Hamas or whatever form of Hamas may grow from the bottom of the rubbles. So for sure the two-state solutions – solution is the only way. But my humble opinion is that, in this situation, there are many things that have to happen at the same time. It’s not one thing. Because if one envisage a two-state solution now, just like one piece, then who will be on the Palestinian side? So the reform of Palestinian politics, the need for a body that would somehow represent all the Palestinian society and would be a credible interlocutor to all the parties involved, on one hand; on the other hand, a direct involvement of the Arab countries that are the most interested and those, and also at the same time, the most vulnerable, potentially, from the escalation of this conflict, to create an interforce that, together with Türkiye and under some guarantees of United States, would somehow make sure that what may be a Palestinian state will not be seen like a threat again for Israel. And of course all this without the liberation of hostages sounds very improbable. And at the end, last but not least, for sure I don’t envy the Secretary of State. MODERATOR: And now at the end, we would like to thank you all for being here today. Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press Availability |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 03:53 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press AvailabilityRemarks February 15, 2024 PRIME MINISTER RAMA: (Via interpreter) Dearest U.S. State Secretary, dear Tony, it’s always a remarkable day of special meaning in the history of Albania’s international relations, the day when a U.S. state secretary visits our country. Well, in our books you are the sixth state secretary visiting, but this time we have a special appreciation of this visit, as we are very much aware of the troubled times happening not only in the European world but also in other areas of strategic importance for the global balances. Consequently, actually this is something that adds especially to the burden of your agenda. The very fact that you found time and saw it necessary to stop in Tirana is, to us, a very important sign of our friendship but also of your appreciation of this friendship, of this partnership, and of course, the appreciation of this region. Well, I cannot help but share with the public the regret that between a dinner with us in Albania and a dinner in Munich, where you have to depart quite immediately, you chose the not-so-tasteful German food. Well, we did our best. Our dinner was ready. We are highly honored by the visit of the state secretary today, and I could say without any diplomatic or any protocol embellishment that I am very pleased with our open, deep conversation and the level of interaction and understanding between us. I feel very pleased that your visit coincides with Albania’s – at conclusion of its mission in the UN secretary – in the UN Security Council. And in addition to extending my thanks to the state secretary, the gratitude for the invaluable support we had from the United States and its mission at the United Nations, their support of our presence in the council and the support to our success in the course of the two years where we were not permanent members of the UN Security Council. I also extended my gratitude for the very touching message that the United States ambassador in the United Nations shared for the high appraisal she actually made for the work of the Albanian team, for the very positive notes and words she shared with the public on the way in which Albania managed to represent itself, but even more than that, the way in which Albania managed to represent this community of countries and states that stand together for some values and principles that are non-negotiable to us. On the other hand, I wish to thank the state secretary publicly also for another support that maybe is not so much talked about, and it’s not so visible, but it’s a constant, important, and useful support for Albania to progress on its path towards EU accession. Clearly, this is a process that depends on what we do; it also depends on the assessment and judgment of our allies in the European Union. But since some years now, we have remarkably felt the constant interest of the U.S. administration, and in particular the continuous interest shown by the State Department, and the fact that in his important meetings with European allies, the state secretary always underscores the need to push further the integration process for Albania and Western Balkans in the EU as a strategic interest of the United States. On the other hand, we spoke about the region. We shared the same perspectives and concerns. As you know, Albania has a policy of an extended friendship hand for all the countries of the region, and we are interested and wanting that the region moves ahead as a whole, because first and foremost is – it is in our strategic interest. It is in the interest of our people to see its integration with Europe as an integral part of the integration of this region around values and principles that embody our being part of the large community of democratic states and countries. We have encouraged, we encourage, and will continue to encourage the irreplaceable dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. The United States have been our and will be the staunch supporters of the process for the final recognition of Kosovo and to meet the international subjectivity of Kosovo. And it is actually better for all Albanians and also Albanians in Kosovo to be reminded – remember that without the United States there would not be an independent state of Kosovo, and that the interest of the United States in this region, and specifically the interest of the United States for things to run smoothly in Albania and Kosovo, is not a secondhand interest. It is neither an interest that is separate in any respect from our interest in Albania and Kosovo to build a peaceful and prosperous future for the next generations. It is unquestionable – so there is no doubt that we actually feel regret any time we witness steps back. Of course, we are aware of the difficulties of the dialogue. There is no doubt that we are cognizant of the wounds of a not so past strategy of – a tragedy of those who live in Kosovo. And we are also aware that in certain points in time, such as the terrorist attack in Banjska, Serbia does not always help the process as it should. But first and foremost, Albanians of Kosovo and all of us must be conscious that it is in our interest, it is in the interest of Kosovo, to progress even unilaterally, should the need arise, to meet all those requests put on the table of dialogue that are not restrictive demands. They are neither demands for Kosovo to give up a single millimeter of its dignity, of its sovereignty, and of its future. These are requirements or demands that through their delivery ensure the establishment of a context that elevates the Republic of Kosovo as a republic that deserves all the support, all the support and also the trust of our strategic partners, without whom the future becomes even more remote and the present becomes even more complicated. So even today, after we discussed and talked, I want to repeat our appeal, my appeal, for the authorities in Pristina not to take any steps without consulting and being coordinated with our strategic allies because it is first and foremost in their interest, and of course it is in the interest of our alliance. Actions that are not consulted and uncoordinated could perhaps gain some votes for the moment, turning the foreign policy into a tool and function of the domestic policy. But there is no long-term gain. On the other hand, we discussed about the dimensions of our bilateral cooperation, with the latter not only being a constant strategic operation in the area of security, but it is also a cooperation that is increasingly gaining an economic dimension. While it is unquestionable the need and importance of U.S. investments in Albania as a testament not only of this relationship but also of the awareness of the large potential Albania has in critical sectors for the world today and for our region, for example, like the energy sector. The U.S. administration is highly engaged in working to tackle the climate challenge, and it is highly committed to supporting all the programs and projects of green energy. And we believe that in this respect, U.S. companies are a desired partner, and we hope that this process that has already kicked off will progress further. Equally so, we believe that Albania is a country – and the Secretary actually is a witness of this himself – this is a country that the U.S. tourists actually can visit because it’s worth it. As differently from the United States or other countries, in a very small country without going hours of distance, one can find everything, all the natural beauties, ranging from the beaches to the mountains full of snow. By way of concluding, last by not least, I wish to publicly thank the state secretary for what we’ve been discussing again and again in all our meeting. And something that we repeated in our meeting as well that is the irreplaceable support to transform Albania from a country that had never justice and where the impunity culture was the norm, that made the citizens of the country, from the establish of the Albanian state, that it would never be possible in this country for the law to be actually equal for everyone, and so that no one could be above the law. They made it possible for us to see today that even in Albania, just like in every country that is ambitious for their own children, it is possible that people in office, also people who are also part of the current executive power, could actually be called accountable before the law for breaching the law. This is something whose weight and importance Albania will be able to fully perceive many years later. But there is something we know even now: that when we started the reform in justice and we received the support of our allies, all the polls and questionnaires of the public on the reform saw an overwhelming support, irrespective of the political affiliations and irrespective of the typical and tradition polarization of politics; either left- or right-wing supporters or those who are not affiliated with any parties, support this reform in justice. It is no secret, Mr. Secretary, that here we have a problem. We can’t find a consensus even on time. If you ask anyone on what the time is, we have a left wing time, a right wing time, and we have also a central time. However, when it came to the question whether those who supported the reform in justice believed that they would be able to see in their lifetime important people going before the justice, the majority answered with a no. Well, here we are today. We are living in a time where the myth of impunity and the myth of the powerful above the law has been debunked. Of course, there is a lot of work that remains to be done. We talked about the challenges. We talked about the advancement of the reform. We talked about how imperative it is to counter the phenomenon of corruption as a phenomenon that must be looked at from the perspective of the integration process with all its aspects as well. But if there is a reason, an important reason today to be more convinced than ever of the value of this partnership, of the value of this friendship, this reason is the commitment of our strategic partners to offering support and assistance to change a chapter of the history of Albania that seemed to be unchangeable throughout a lifetime and for all the generations. Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. Thank you very much. Tony, the floor is yours. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Prime Minister, Edi, thank you so much for welcoming us here today, and not just welcoming us – the warmth, the hospitality, the substance, directness, frankness of our conversations – something I always deeply appreciate. I’m going to start with two expressions that we have. One is the expression “rain check.” So if you miss out on someone’s hospitality, if you miss out on a kind invitation to dinner, you ask for a rain check. So I’m asking for a rain check, if you’ll have me back. Second is another expression we have and that is the notion of a “fair weather friend.” That’s a friend who’s with you when the sun is shining but not when the rain is coming down. Albania is not only a fair weather friend, it’s also a foul weather friend – together, even when the going is tough, even when we’re facing challenges. And that’s something I can’t begin to tell you how much we appreciate and value. And it’s a tribute to this country and the friendship we have, and it’s a tribute to the prime minister, who is an extraordinary partner for the United States. I’m here on my first visit as Secretary to Albania because this partnership between our two countries is stronger than it’s ever been. And the relationship for us is vital to addressing so many issues that matter to our people. This is a two-way street, and we are doing things with each other and for each other that are to the benefit of people here in Albania and in the United States and beyond, I would argue. As a key NATO Ally, a powerful voice on the UN Security Council – and you heard the prime minister allude to this – we had a really extraordinary partnership during the two years that Albania was a non‑permanent member of the council, and that was reflected in the message the prime minister referenced from our ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield. We did, I think, very, very important and strong work together, particularly holding the pen together on the question of Ukraine and the Russian aggression, something we deeply value; now a new member of the Human Rights Council, and also playing a growing role in other critical international institutions, including UNESCO. This is consequential not just for Albania, not just for the region, not just for Europe; it’s actually consequential for the world, and we deeply, deeply appreciate it. We had the opportunity today to discuss a lot of issues and challenges that we’re facing together, and we focused first on what we’re doing to promote our shared security. As you know, Albania has been from day one a strong supporter of Ukraine – really the first to step up, to raise its hand. It was one of the first countries to send military aid to Ukraine in the wake of the Russian aggression – guns, ammunition, mine resistant vehicles – and it’s currently one of the top ten per capita in terms of its support for Ukraine and security assistance. The prime minister said this at the Security Council last September, and I’m going to – Edi, if I can, I’m going to quote you: “The struggle of Ukraine is also the struggle of everyone who aspires to live in a world where nations are free and equal, where territorial integrity is indisputable, and right to live in peace is unquestionable.” It’s hard to think of a more elegant way to put what’s at stake in Ukraine. Over its 15 years now in NATO, Albania has made significant contributions to our alliance. Albanian troops are helping to keep the peace in Kosovo to deter Russian aggression on NATO’s eastern flank. Next month, Albania will inaugurate a NATO airbase in Kucove. Our 31 Allies, soon to be 32 Allies, bring different histories, different experiences, different geographies, different capabilities. But each of us has the same ironclad commitment to our mutual defense, and each of us makes important contributions and sacrifices. In the last three years alone, virtually every Ally has increased defense spending as a percentage of its GDP. Together, our collective strength is much more than the sum of our parts. It’s an enduring investment in shared security, shared prosperity, and in the principles that join us together. We’re grateful that Albania is doing its part, prepared to continue to do its part. We’re fully committed to upholding our obligations as well. Our countries are also growing our bilateral security partnership. Albanians and Americans have fought side by side from Afghanistan to Iraq. Albanian pilots fly American-made Blackhawks. U.S. Special Forces are training their Albanian counterparts and helping to keep watching the Balkans. In the wake of the recent Iranian cyber attacks targeting Albanian critical infrastructure, the United States has supported Albania cyber defenses, helping to train experts, to upgrade equipment, to improve technology so that they’re more resilient to future attacks. I thank the Prime Minister as well for something that is near and dear to my heart, and near and dear to the hearts of so many Americans, and that is the extraordinary generosity that the Albanian people have shown in welcoming thousands of Afghan evacuees. Albania was the very first country to do so. I had a chance a little bit earlier today to meet with some of the most recent evacuees from Afghanistan who will be going on to the United States. They’re getting their Special Immigrant Visas, and then they’ll come to be part of the next chapter in the story of the United States. These are people who have endured incredible hardship, who’ve shown remarkable courage. And what I heard from them today was not just gratitude for being welcomed here, Mr. Prime Minister, in Albania, but the way they were welcomed by the Albanian people: with extraordinary warmth and support. And it’s hard to – it’s hard to describe how much that means to people like our Afghan colleagues and friends who are in the midst of the most uprooting experience possible. We’re committed to resettling them in America, offering them a similarly warm welcome, but I have to say we’re really inspired by the way that you’ve done it. The prime minister and I also discussed how to keep making Albania’s democratic institutions more accountable to Albania’s citizens. Justice reform has not been easy, perfect, or quick, but it is showing real results, and you heard the prime minister describe them. Today I met with key judges and prosecutors who are helping to lead the reform effort. Corrupt officials are being held accountable. Members of organized crime are going to prison and losing their assets. So this is a very powerful process, but it’s a process, and it continues to move forward. We’ll continue to strongly support Albania in these efforts, which are critical steps toward Albania joining the European Union and what the people in Albania deserve. Our democracies are also threatened, both of us, by disinformation. And that fuels division and it erodes trust. We just signed with the foreign minister memorandums of understanding, and the one that we signed a moment ago will enable the United States and Albania to develop a shared approach to countering dangerous distortions and lies and build a resilient information ecosystem. There is an information competition, even an information war, that goes on day in, day out. And it’s critical that democracies have the tools that they need to act effectively in dealing with it. We also discussed ways to further strengthen our economic relations, again, as the prime minister said. American investment in Albania has tripled since 2019, and it will only grow more as the business climate continues to improve. Our companies are exploring hydropower, wind, solar projects in Albania. These have great potential to diversify Albanian energy resources and sources to help our shared planet and to create inclusive economic growth for everyone. Finally, we committed to deepening ties between our people. Edi and I just came from a really terrific gathering at the Pyramid just a few doors away from here, where I met some of the young people who are participating in our exchange programs – their alumni and current participants. These programs are making the bonds between us stronger every single day. So the other memorandum of understanding that we signed for the Fulbright Program will double the number of Albanians who can study on scholarships in the United States, bringing our people even more closely together. One of my predecessors who I see on the wall here to my left, Secretary James Baker, famously told the Albanian people, and I quote, “You are with us and we are with you.” That was true three decades ago. It remains true today. It will remain true tomorrow. Thank you, Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Thank you. MODERATOR: Prime Minister and Secretary of State, there are some questions from the journalists for you. First question is from Muhamed Veliu from Top Channel Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) I – a joint question. Dear Mr. Secretary, you just mentioned that Kucove Base is going to be inaugurated one month later, whereas Prime Minister Edi Rama has offered Albania’s readiness and continues meetings in NATO and here to have a maritime base for NATO in Durres Port. Did you discuss about this matter in your bilateral meetings today? And is there any progress, if any? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. Well, in fact, I had an opportunity to meet with a number of different people and different groups besides the prime minister, foreign minister, members of the cabinet, as I mentioned. I also met with some of the leading judges and prosecutors who are leading the judicial reform effort. I had a chance to meet with some, as I mentioned, remarkable young people who are engaged in our exchange programs. And when I come back for my rain check for dinner, I’ll look forward to meeting an even broader cross section of Albanian society and all of the different actors. But we, I think, got a lot into this day – something I take great satisfaction in. With regard to the air base, first, I think it’s important to underscore a couple of things. One, it’s now 15 years since Albania has been a NATO Ally. And the fact that we’ll be inaugurating – you’ll be inaugurating the air base in Kucove in just a few weeks is a wonderful way to highlight and underscore the commitment that Albania has made to NATO and that NATO, of course, has to Albania. This is a very strong example of the defense partnership that we enjoy. When it comes to the question of a maritime base, yes, this is something that we discussed and that I very much look forward to pursuing through NATO and through the processes that NATO has to determine what future assets would be valuable to the Alliance. And we discussed this, and I know that NATO will work on it. MODERATOR: Next question is from Olivia Gazis from CBS. QUESTION: (Off-mike.) SECRETARY BLINKEN: Edi, is there anything you wanted to add? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: I don’t think that I was also involved, but – (laughter) – but as you know, when he’s not here, what I say is like he’s saying it. And now that he’s said it, what can I say more? (Laughter.) QUESTION: Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, information has emerged about a serious national security threat from Russia with lawmakers of both parties in the United States pressing for a response from the administration. How would you characterize, first, the urgency of the threat in question, and secondly, the United States current preparedness to confront it? And secondly on Gaza, what is the United States level of confidence right now that negotiating parties can achieve an agreement that pauses hostilities before the beginning of Ramadan on March 10th? And Mr. Prime Minister, on Ukraine, the Secretary referenced Albania’s significant contributions. The U.S. Congress has struggled for months now to pass a significant aid package for the Ukrainians, even as Kyiv is entering its third year of war with Russia. Do you believe that this indicates American support for Ukraine is waning and do you see it undermining broader Western efforts to push back against Moscow? And secondly, if I may, Mr. Prime Minister, on NATO, given recent statements by the Republican presidential frontrunner in the United States, do you have confidence that America will uphold its commitments to NATO’s collective defense pact no matter what members’ defense spending levels are and no matter what the outcome is in November? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Olivia. So on the first question, there’s not much that I can say right now on the underlying issue. What I can say is this: This is not an active capability, but it is a potential one that we’re taking very, very seriously. And I would expect that we’ll have more to say soon – in fact, very soon – so stay tuned for that. And, of course, we’re also conferring with allies and partners on this issue. But here’s the most important thing of all: The President’s focus, President Biden’s focus, is on the security of the United States and its people. And as we approach this and every other issue, that is first and foremost what’s on his mind. That’s where his focus is. On the question of hostages, so as you know, we put forward a proposal to Hamas that the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, working with Israel, had had put together and then, as I said, put forward. We received a response from Hamas about a week ago, a response that we believe, while it has, as I said at the time, a number of clear nonstarters in it, also offers the possibility of working toward an agreement. We’re now in the process with our counterparts from Qatar, from Egypt, from Israel in working on that and working very intensely on that with the goal of trying to find an agreement. And I believe that it is possible. Now, as I said, there are some very, very hard issues that have to be resolved, but we’re committed to doing everything we can to move forward and to see if we can reach an agreement. We know what success looks like. We had it when we secured the first agreement that resulted in the release of 105 hostages, that resulted in a pause in military operations, the substantial expansion of humanitarian assistance going into people who so desperately needed it. If an agreement can be reached here, it offers the prospect, of course, doing what is at the top of our list, which is getting the hostages home to their families, but also having an extended pause, which offers many other benefits as well. So we’re very focused on it, and I believe it’s possible. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: You are tricking me into something that I am afraid might be dangerous, because answering to your question, I have to melt in American politics, which is not very advisable when you are a friend with United States. But I want to take advantage from your presence to invite you, maybe through your TV, to share with the American public a map of Mongolia. Following Mr. Putin’s interview and his reasoning on the legitimacy of attacking Ukraine that went back to 9th century – but if you dig a bit more, you’ll discover that Russia once upon a time was within the borders of Mongolia. So I know that Mongolians are a peaceful people, but I don’t think that – looking back to the maps and using history like a reason to attack other people, to take others’ lives, to destroy others’ houses, to break others’ future, is a quite insane exercise. And being in that in that situation, Ukraine couldn’t survive so far without the United States, first and foremost, and all the other allies and friends who, by the way, are not eager to enter in war with Russia or with whomever, but have to protect Ukraine for protecting the world they believe in. Now, if you want me to have a take on the American Congress and Senate, I think I should not go there, because let’s say that the American politics nowadays is not at its best. But one thing I can say, I had the privilege to be prime minister for Albania in NATO when the former president was there. And despite the rhetoric, despite the colorful way to confront adversaries, I don’t see that NATO was weakened. On the contrary, what was decided before continued to be the case. Every country continued to put more money and to put more effort in increasing the NATO budget. So now, elections are elections, Trump is Trump. American politics is American politics. But I think United States is something more than that. And what makes United States one of a kind in the – in our community of countries and of people all around the world is that United States cannot and will never, in my view, shy away from what are the principles and the values to be protected, whatever it takes. And so I’m not afraid of anything, but of stopping or wavering to continue and protect ourselves through protecting the right of Ukrainians to live in their country, to have their own house intact, to have their children grow there, and to have a common future with everyone else, without being threatened to be wiped out from maps based on ninth, thirteenth, fifteenth, whatever century. Because if this Pandora box opens then I can tell you we have a lot of maps in this region, but we have to see the future, and it’s only the future that will unite us. So no, I don’t think that NATO will be weakened. I don’t think the United States will shy away from their role and from their leadership. I then that when elections will be over, American business is American business. MODERATOR: Next question is from Elja Zotka, journalist of Klan Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Mr. Secretary, you did not touch upon the region and Kosovo in your remarks. Therefore, I wish to ask specifically a question about Kosovo. What is your view of the latest developments in Kosovo? How do you see the steps that have been taken in the dialogue with Serbia? Also the removal of dinar as the currency – do you see it as concerning, and also the fact that there is no steps being taken to establishing the associations? Well, Mr. Prime Minister, you already gave an answer, but I don’t know whether you’ve had – you have something to add when it comes to the situation in Kosovo. A second question for Mr. Secretary, if it is possible. You mentioned that you had a meeting with the heads of the justice institutions, and justice is a matter close to our heart as a people, because we’ve been missing it so far. Could you specifically speak about the message you imparted to the heads of our justice institutions on behalf of the U.S. in your although very brief meeting? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. When I started out working at the State Department and at the White House, now I’m afraid to say more than 30 years ago, the issue, the question, the challenge that was front and center – this is during President Clinton’s administration – was the Balkans, first Bosnia and Herzegovina, then Kosovo. And so many of us have a long and deep history, no one more so than the President of the United States, President Biden. And I think you know that history well. And so we’re strongly animated by the notion that we can’t go back to the future. We can’t have a repeat of what we saw and what too many people experienced in the 1990s, which is why we’re committed to supporting all of the efforts to advance the integration of countries in the Western Balkans, with each other and with Europe. With regard to Kosovo and Serbia more specifically, the EU-facilitated dialogue is the right – in fact, I think the only – path forward. And we’re committed to doing what we can to support both countries as they travel that path. But I also have to applaud Albania’s role in being a force for regional stability, for regional integration, for regional progress. That is the path that so clearly brings everyone to a better future. And we know what the alternative is because we’ve experienced it, we’ve seen it. So we’re resolute in doing everything we can in support of all the countries in the region taking that path. We very much support, as I said, the EU-facilitated dialogue. And we’ll work with Albania and others to try to help countries advance along that path. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Ditto. MODERATOR: Any comment? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: No, no, no. Ditto. MODERATOR: Next question is from Alexander Marquardt, CNN. QUESTION: Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, you just said a moment ago that you think that a deal is possible, a humanitarian pause and a hostage deal. After the meeting that took place earlier this week in Cairo, do you think that that deal and a pause could be reached before Israel launches its expected offensive into Rafah? Do you think Prime Minister Netanyahu favors that Rafah offensive over reaching a hostage deal and a humanitarian pause? And then separately, two teenage American boys have now been killed in the West Bank in the past few weeks. An American woman was detained by Israeli forces in the West Bank. Two young American men were also detained by Israeli forces in Gaza. Have those detainees gotten U.S. consular access? Do you even know where those detainees are? And when it comes to the investigations into the teenagers’ deaths, where do those stand? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, Alex. QUESTION: And Mr. Secretary, may I ask the prime minister also a question? Albania recognized Palestine in 1988. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said earlier today that now is not the time to be speaking about gifts for the Palestinian people. Do you think that a two-state solution is still possible with the current Israeli Government, and how do you and the U.S. think that is achievable? Thank you both. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Alex. So look, on the first question, I’m obviously not going to be speaking for the prime minister or telling you what his views may or may not be on these questions. You’ll have to ask him yourself or have others ask him. All I can tell you is this. As I said to Olivia’s question, we believe it must be and must remain a priority to do everything we can to bring the hostages home, to get them back with their loved ones, and that’s where our focus is. We’ve done a lot of work to try to get back to this point; that is where we think an agreement is possible, even if it – even if difficult. And at least from the perspective of the United States, we think it’s imperative that we continue to pursue that urgently. And as I said, that would bring many other benefits with it, and notably an extended pause to the conflict, an extended expansion of humanitarian assistance, all things that would be very, very welcome – more than welcome – by men, women, and children in Gaza who continue to suffer every single day. So that’s where our focus is, but in terms of timing, how one thing fits with another, you’ll have to ask the prime minister. Edi. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Yes. QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, on the detainees — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Oh, I’m sorry. Yes, on the detainees – or this question – well, two things. First, with regard to American citizens who reportedly were killed, the first thing I would say is our deepest condolences to the families, to the loved ones, to the friends. You’ve heard me say this before, the President feels the same say: the safety, the security of American citizens around the world is our number one priority, our number one responsibility. And we’ve made clear that with regard to the instance you alluded to, there needs to be an investigation. We need to get the facts and, if appropriate, there needs to be accountability. With regard to detainees, there is a limit to what I can say because of the privacy laws and the requirements that flow from that. But I can just say in general, without reference to specific cases, we insist that people be treated fairly, that they be treated with due process, and that they be treated humanely. And that’s something that, regardless of where an American citizen might be detained, we insist on and will continue to insist on. Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: It’s in my humble view the hardest (inaudible) one can get. And the answer straightforward to your question: yes, Albania has recognized Palestine long ago. To give you a little background, Albania was a communist dictatorship, and our dictator was one of the closest friends and allies of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, PLO, and of Yasser Arafat. And on the other hand, our regime was very viciously against three major devils – United States, Soviet Union, and Israel, so in other words, American imperialism, Soviet social imperialism, and Jewish Zionism. But this country, on the other hand, is the only country in Europe that had more Jews after the Second World War than before, and it’s the only country where Jews didn’t fly out, but flew in to be protected. And as it is very well shown in Yad Vashem, it’s a country where the Nazis didn’t succeed to get a single Jew. This is the background. Now, of course, the situation is tragic because on one hand, Israel has its legitimate right to defend itself, but on the other hand, the destroyal and the loss of life on the Palestinian side are far too much to accept the escalation, the further escalation. And the trouble is that this further escalation is not an action that, at the end, by itself will wipe out Hamas or whatever form of Hamas may grow from the bottom of the rubbles. So for sure the two-state solutions – solution is the only way. But my humble opinion is that, in this situation, there are many things that have to happen at the same time. It’s not one thing. Because if one envisage a two-state solution now, just like one piece, then who will be on the Palestinian side? So the reform of Palestinian politics, the need for a body that would somehow represent all the Palestinian society and would be a credible interlocutor to all the parties involved, on one hand; on the other hand, a direct involvement of the Arab countries that are the most interested and those, and also at the same time, the most vulnerable, potentially, from the escalation of this conflict, to create an interforce that, together with Türkiye and under some guarantees of United States, would somehow make sure that what may be a Palestinian state will not be seen like a threat again for Israel. And of course all this without the liberation of hostages sounds very improbable. And at the end, last but not least, for sure I don’t envy the Secretary of State. MODERATOR: And now at the end, we would like to thank you all for being here today. Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press Availability |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 03:53 PM EST Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama at a Joint Press AvailabilityRemarks February 15, 2024 PRIME MINISTER RAMA: (Via interpreter) Dearest U.S. State Secretary, dear Tony, it’s always a remarkable day of special meaning in the history of Albania’s international relations, the day when a U.S. state secretary visits our country. Well, in our books you are the sixth state secretary visiting, but this time we have a special appreciation of this visit, as we are very much aware of the troubled times happening not only in the European world but also in other areas of strategic importance for the global balances. Consequently, actually this is something that adds especially to the burden of your agenda. The very fact that you found time and saw it necessary to stop in Tirana is, to us, a very important sign of our friendship but also of your appreciation of this friendship, of this partnership, and of course, the appreciation of this region. Well, I cannot help but share with the public the regret that between a dinner with us in Albania and a dinner in Munich, where you have to depart quite immediately, you chose the not-so-tasteful German food. Well, we did our best. Our dinner was ready. We are highly honored by the visit of the state secretary today, and I could say without any diplomatic or any protocol embellishment that I am very pleased with our open, deep conversation and the level of interaction and understanding between us. I feel very pleased that your visit coincides with Albania’s – at conclusion of its mission in the UN secretary – in the UN Security Council. And in addition to extending my thanks to the state secretary, the gratitude for the invaluable support we had from the United States and its mission at the United Nations, their support of our presence in the council and the support to our success in the course of the two years where we were not permanent members of the UN Security Council. I also extended my gratitude for the very touching message that the United States ambassador in the United Nations shared for the high appraisal she actually made for the work of the Albanian team, for the very positive notes and words she shared with the public on the way in which Albania managed to represent itself, but even more than that, the way in which Albania managed to represent this community of countries and states that stand together for some values and principles that are non-negotiable to us. On the other hand, I wish to thank the state secretary publicly also for another support that maybe is not so much talked about, and it’s not so visible, but it’s a constant, important, and useful support for Albania to progress on its path towards EU accession. Clearly, this is a process that depends on what we do; it also depends on the assessment and judgment of our allies in the European Union. But since some years now, we have remarkably felt the constant interest of the U.S. administration, and in particular the continuous interest shown by the State Department, and the fact that in his important meetings with European allies, the state secretary always underscores the need to push further the integration process for Albania and Western Balkans in the EU as a strategic interest of the United States. On the other hand, we spoke about the region. We shared the same perspectives and concerns. As you know, Albania has a policy of an extended friendship hand for all the countries of the region, and we are interested and wanting that the region moves ahead as a whole, because first and foremost is – it is in our strategic interest. It is in the interest of our people to see its integration with Europe as an integral part of the integration of this region around values and principles that embody our being part of the large community of democratic states and countries. We have encouraged, we encourage, and will continue to encourage the irreplaceable dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. The United States have been our and will be the staunch supporters of the process for the final recognition of Kosovo and to meet the international subjectivity of Kosovo. And it is actually better for all Albanians and also Albanians in Kosovo to be reminded – remember that without the United States there would not be an independent state of Kosovo, and that the interest of the United States in this region, and specifically the interest of the United States for things to run smoothly in Albania and Kosovo, is not a secondhand interest. It is neither an interest that is separate in any respect from our interest in Albania and Kosovo to build a peaceful and prosperous future for the next generations. It is unquestionable – so there is no doubt that we actually feel regret any time we witness steps back. Of course, we are aware of the difficulties of the dialogue. There is no doubt that we are cognizant of the wounds of a not so past strategy of – a tragedy of those who live in Kosovo. And we are also aware that in certain points in time, such as the terrorist attack in Banjska, Serbia does not always help the process as it should. But first and foremost, Albanians of Kosovo and all of us must be conscious that it is in our interest, it is in the interest of Kosovo, to progress even unilaterally, should the need arise, to meet all those requests put on the table of dialogue that are not restrictive demands. They are neither demands for Kosovo to give up a single millimeter of its dignity, of its sovereignty, and of its future. These are requirements or demands that through their delivery ensure the establishment of a context that elevates the Republic of Kosovo as a republic that deserves all the support, all the support and also the trust of our strategic partners, without whom the future becomes even more remote and the present becomes even more complicated. So even today, after we discussed and talked, I want to repeat our appeal, my appeal, for the authorities in Pristina not to take any steps without consulting and being coordinated with our strategic allies because it is first and foremost in their interest, and of course it is in the interest of our alliance. Actions that are not consulted and uncoordinated could perhaps gain some votes for the moment, turning the foreign policy into a tool and function of the domestic policy. But there is no long-term gain. On the other hand, we discussed about the dimensions of our bilateral cooperation, with the latter not only being a constant strategic operation in the area of security, but it is also a cooperation that is increasingly gaining an economic dimension. While it is unquestionable the need and importance of U.S. investments in Albania as a testament not only of this relationship but also of the awareness of the large potential Albania has in critical sectors for the world today and for our region, for example, like the energy sector. The U.S. administration is highly engaged in working to tackle the climate challenge, and it is highly committed to supporting all the programs and projects of green energy. And we believe that in this respect, U.S. companies are a desired partner, and we hope that this process that has already kicked off will progress further. Equally so, we believe that Albania is a country – and the Secretary actually is a witness of this himself – this is a country that the U.S. tourists actually can visit because it’s worth it. As differently from the United States or other countries, in a very small country without going hours of distance, one can find everything, all the natural beauties, ranging from the beaches to the mountains full of snow. By way of concluding, last by not least, I wish to publicly thank the state secretary for what we’ve been discussing again and again in all our meeting. And something that we repeated in our meeting as well that is the irreplaceable support to transform Albania from a country that had never justice and where the impunity culture was the norm, that made the citizens of the country, from the establish of the Albanian state, that it would never be possible in this country for the law to be actually equal for everyone, and so that no one could be above the law. They made it possible for us to see today that even in Albania, just like in every country that is ambitious for their own children, it is possible that people in office, also people who are also part of the current executive power, could actually be called accountable before the law for breaching the law. This is something whose weight and importance Albania will be able to fully perceive many years later. But there is something we know even now: that when we started the reform in justice and we received the support of our allies, all the polls and questionnaires of the public on the reform saw an overwhelming support, irrespective of the political affiliations and irrespective of the typical and tradition polarization of politics; either left- or right-wing supporters or those who are not affiliated with any parties, support this reform in justice. It is no secret, Mr. Secretary, that here we have a problem. We can’t find a consensus even on time. If you ask anyone on what the time is, we have a left wing time, a right wing time, and we have also a central time. However, when it came to the question whether those who supported the reform in justice believed that they would be able to see in their lifetime important people going before the justice, the majority answered with a no. Well, here we are today. We are living in a time where the myth of impunity and the myth of the powerful above the law has been debunked. Of course, there is a lot of work that remains to be done. We talked about the challenges. We talked about the advancement of the reform. We talked about how imperative it is to counter the phenomenon of corruption as a phenomenon that must be looked at from the perspective of the integration process with all its aspects as well. But if there is a reason, an important reason today to be more convinced than ever of the value of this partnership, of the value of this friendship, this reason is the commitment of our strategic partners to offering support and assistance to change a chapter of the history of Albania that seemed to be unchangeable throughout a lifetime and for all the generations. Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. Thank you very much. Tony, the floor is yours. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Prime Minister, Edi, thank you so much for welcoming us here today, and not just welcoming us – the warmth, the hospitality, the substance, directness, frankness of our conversations – something I always deeply appreciate. I’m going to start with two expressions that we have. One is the expression “rain check.” So if you miss out on someone’s hospitality, if you miss out on a kind invitation to dinner, you ask for a rain check. So I’m asking for a rain check, if you’ll have me back. Second is another expression we have and that is the notion of a “fair weather friend.” That’s a friend who’s with you when the sun is shining but not when the rain is coming down. Albania is not only a fair weather friend, it’s also a foul weather friend – together, even when the going is tough, even when we’re facing challenges. And that’s something I can’t begin to tell you how much we appreciate and value. And it’s a tribute to this country and the friendship we have, and it’s a tribute to the prime minister, who is an extraordinary partner for the United States. I’m here on my first visit as Secretary to Albania because this partnership between our two countries is stronger than it’s ever been. And the relationship for us is vital to addressing so many issues that matter to our people. This is a two-way street, and we are doing things with each other and for each other that are to the benefit of people here in Albania and in the United States and beyond, I would argue. As a key NATO Ally, a powerful voice on the UN Security Council – and you heard the prime minister allude to this – we had a really extraordinary partnership during the two years that Albania was a non‑permanent member of the council, and that was reflected in the message the prime minister referenced from our ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield. We did, I think, very, very important and strong work together, particularly holding the pen together on the question of Ukraine and the Russian aggression, something we deeply value; now a new member of the Human Rights Council, and also playing a growing role in other critical international institutions, including UNESCO. This is consequential not just for Albania, not just for the region, not just for Europe; it’s actually consequential for the world, and we deeply, deeply appreciate it. We had the opportunity today to discuss a lot of issues and challenges that we’re facing together, and we focused first on what we’re doing to promote our shared security. As you know, Albania has been from day one a strong supporter of Ukraine – really the first to step up, to raise its hand. It was one of the first countries to send military aid to Ukraine in the wake of the Russian aggression – guns, ammunition, mine resistant vehicles – and it’s currently one of the top ten per capita in terms of its support for Ukraine and security assistance. The prime minister said this at the Security Council last September, and I’m going to – Edi, if I can, I’m going to quote you: “The struggle of Ukraine is also the struggle of everyone who aspires to live in a world where nations are free and equal, where territorial integrity is indisputable, and right to live in peace is unquestionable.” It’s hard to think of a more elegant way to put what’s at stake in Ukraine. Over its 15 years now in NATO, Albania has made significant contributions to our alliance. Albanian troops are helping to keep the peace in Kosovo to deter Russian aggression on NATO’s eastern flank. Next month, Albania will inaugurate a NATO airbase in Kucove. Our 31 Allies, soon to be 32 Allies, bring different histories, different experiences, different geographies, different capabilities. But each of us has the same ironclad commitment to our mutual defense, and each of us makes important contributions and sacrifices. In the last three years alone, virtually every Ally has increased defense spending as a percentage of its GDP. Together, our collective strength is much more than the sum of our parts. It’s an enduring investment in shared security, shared prosperity, and in the principles that join us together. We’re grateful that Albania is doing its part, prepared to continue to do its part. We’re fully committed to upholding our obligations as well. Our countries are also growing our bilateral security partnership. Albanians and Americans have fought side by side from Afghanistan to Iraq. Albanian pilots fly American-made Blackhawks. U.S. Special Forces are training their Albanian counterparts and helping to keep watching the Balkans. In the wake of the recent Iranian cyber attacks targeting Albanian critical infrastructure, the United States has supported Albania cyber defenses, helping to train experts, to upgrade equipment, to improve technology so that they’re more resilient to future attacks. I thank the Prime Minister as well for something that is near and dear to my heart, and near and dear to the hearts of so many Americans, and that is the extraordinary generosity that the Albanian people have shown in welcoming thousands of Afghan evacuees. Albania was the very first country to do so. I had a chance a little bit earlier today to meet with some of the most recent evacuees from Afghanistan who will be going on to the United States. They’re getting their Special Immigrant Visas, and then they’ll come to be part of the next chapter in the story of the United States. These are people who have endured incredible hardship, who’ve shown remarkable courage. And what I heard from them today was not just gratitude for being welcomed here, Mr. Prime Minister, in Albania, but the way they were welcomed by the Albanian people: with extraordinary warmth and support. And it’s hard to – it’s hard to describe how much that means to people like our Afghan colleagues and friends who are in the midst of the most uprooting experience possible. We’re committed to resettling them in America, offering them a similarly warm welcome, but I have to say we’re really inspired by the way that you’ve done it. The prime minister and I also discussed how to keep making Albania’s democratic institutions more accountable to Albania’s citizens. Justice reform has not been easy, perfect, or quick, but it is showing real results, and you heard the prime minister describe them. Today I met with key judges and prosecutors who are helping to lead the reform effort. Corrupt officials are being held accountable. Members of organized crime are going to prison and losing their assets. So this is a very powerful process, but it’s a process, and it continues to move forward. We’ll continue to strongly support Albania in these efforts, which are critical steps toward Albania joining the European Union and what the people in Albania deserve. Our democracies are also threatened, both of us, by disinformation. And that fuels division and it erodes trust. We just signed with the foreign minister memorandums of understanding, and the one that we signed a moment ago will enable the United States and Albania to develop a shared approach to countering dangerous distortions and lies and build a resilient information ecosystem. There is an information competition, even an information war, that goes on day in, day out. And it’s critical that democracies have the tools that they need to act effectively in dealing with it. We also discussed ways to further strengthen our economic relations, again, as the prime minister said. American investment in Albania has tripled since 2019, and it will only grow more as the business climate continues to improve. Our companies are exploring hydropower, wind, solar projects in Albania. These have great potential to diversify Albanian energy resources and sources to help our shared planet and to create inclusive economic growth for everyone. Finally, we committed to deepening ties between our people. Edi and I just came from a really terrific gathering at the Pyramid just a few doors away from here, where I met some of the young people who are participating in our exchange programs – their alumni and current participants. These programs are making the bonds between us stronger every single day. So the other memorandum of understanding that we signed for the Fulbright Program will double the number of Albanians who can study on scholarships in the United States, bringing our people even more closely together. One of my predecessors who I see on the wall here to my left, Secretary James Baker, famously told the Albanian people, and I quote, “You are with us and we are with you.” That was true three decades ago. It remains true today. It will remain true tomorrow. Thank you, Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Thank you. MODERATOR: Prime Minister and Secretary of State, there are some questions from the journalists for you. First question is from Muhamed Veliu from Top Channel Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) I – a joint question. Dear Mr. Secretary, you just mentioned that Kucove Base is going to be inaugurated one month later, whereas Prime Minister Edi Rama has offered Albania’s readiness and continues meetings in NATO and here to have a maritime base for NATO in Durres Port. Did you discuss about this matter in your bilateral meetings today? And is there any progress, if any? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. Well, in fact, I had an opportunity to meet with a number of different people and different groups besides the prime minister, foreign minister, members of the cabinet, as I mentioned. I also met with some of the leading judges and prosecutors who are leading the judicial reform effort. I had a chance to meet with some, as I mentioned, remarkable young people who are engaged in our exchange programs. And when I come back for my rain check for dinner, I’ll look forward to meeting an even broader cross section of Albanian society and all of the different actors. But we, I think, got a lot into this day – something I take great satisfaction in. With regard to the air base, first, I think it’s important to underscore a couple of things. One, it’s now 15 years since Albania has been a NATO Ally. And the fact that we’ll be inaugurating – you’ll be inaugurating the air base in Kucove in just a few weeks is a wonderful way to highlight and underscore the commitment that Albania has made to NATO and that NATO, of course, has to Albania. This is a very strong example of the defense partnership that we enjoy. When it comes to the question of a maritime base, yes, this is something that we discussed and that I very much look forward to pursuing through NATO and through the processes that NATO has to determine what future assets would be valuable to the Alliance. And we discussed this, and I know that NATO will work on it. MODERATOR: Next question is from Olivia Gazis from CBS. QUESTION: (Off-mike.) SECRETARY BLINKEN: Edi, is there anything you wanted to add? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: I don’t think that I was also involved, but – (laughter) – but as you know, when he’s not here, what I say is like he’s saying it. And now that he’s said it, what can I say more? (Laughter.) QUESTION: Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, information has emerged about a serious national security threat from Russia with lawmakers of both parties in the United States pressing for a response from the administration. How would you characterize, first, the urgency of the threat in question, and secondly, the United States current preparedness to confront it? And secondly on Gaza, what is the United States level of confidence right now that negotiating parties can achieve an agreement that pauses hostilities before the beginning of Ramadan on March 10th? And Mr. Prime Minister, on Ukraine, the Secretary referenced Albania’s significant contributions. The U.S. Congress has struggled for months now to pass a significant aid package for the Ukrainians, even as Kyiv is entering its third year of war with Russia. Do you believe that this indicates American support for Ukraine is waning and do you see it undermining broader Western efforts to push back against Moscow? And secondly, if I may, Mr. Prime Minister, on NATO, given recent statements by the Republican presidential frontrunner in the United States, do you have confidence that America will uphold its commitments to NATO’s collective defense pact no matter what members’ defense spending levels are and no matter what the outcome is in November? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Olivia. So on the first question, there’s not much that I can say right now on the underlying issue. What I can say is this: This is not an active capability, but it is a potential one that we’re taking very, very seriously. And I would expect that we’ll have more to say soon – in fact, very soon – so stay tuned for that. And, of course, we’re also conferring with allies and partners on this issue. But here’s the most important thing of all: The President’s focus, President Biden’s focus, is on the security of the United States and its people. And as we approach this and every other issue, that is first and foremost what’s on his mind. That’s where his focus is. On the question of hostages, so as you know, we put forward a proposal to Hamas that the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, working with Israel, had had put together and then, as I said, put forward. We received a response from Hamas about a week ago, a response that we believe, while it has, as I said at the time, a number of clear nonstarters in it, also offers the possibility of working toward an agreement. We’re now in the process with our counterparts from Qatar, from Egypt, from Israel in working on that and working very intensely on that with the goal of trying to find an agreement. And I believe that it is possible. Now, as I said, there are some very, very hard issues that have to be resolved, but we’re committed to doing everything we can to move forward and to see if we can reach an agreement. We know what success looks like. We had it when we secured the first agreement that resulted in the release of 105 hostages, that resulted in a pause in military operations, the substantial expansion of humanitarian assistance going into people who so desperately needed it. If an agreement can be reached here, it offers the prospect, of course, doing what is at the top of our list, which is getting the hostages home to their families, but also having an extended pause, which offers many other benefits as well. So we’re very focused on it, and I believe it’s possible. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: You are tricking me into something that I am afraid might be dangerous, because answering to your question, I have to melt in American politics, which is not very advisable when you are a friend with United States. But I want to take advantage from your presence to invite you, maybe through your TV, to share with the American public a map of Mongolia. Following Mr. Putin’s interview and his reasoning on the legitimacy of attacking Ukraine that went back to 9th century – but if you dig a bit more, you’ll discover that Russia once upon a time was within the borders of Mongolia. So I know that Mongolians are a peaceful people, but I don’t think that – looking back to the maps and using history like a reason to attack other people, to take others’ lives, to destroy others’ houses, to break others’ future, is a quite insane exercise. And being in that in that situation, Ukraine couldn’t survive so far without the United States, first and foremost, and all the other allies and friends who, by the way, are not eager to enter in war with Russia or with whomever, but have to protect Ukraine for protecting the world they believe in. Now, if you want me to have a take on the American Congress and Senate, I think I should not go there, because let’s say that the American politics nowadays is not at its best. But one thing I can say, I had the privilege to be prime minister for Albania in NATO when the former president was there. And despite the rhetoric, despite the colorful way to confront adversaries, I don’t see that NATO was weakened. On the contrary, what was decided before continued to be the case. Every country continued to put more money and to put more effort in increasing the NATO budget. So now, elections are elections, Trump is Trump. American politics is American politics. But I think United States is something more than that. And what makes United States one of a kind in the – in our community of countries and of people all around the world is that United States cannot and will never, in my view, shy away from what are the principles and the values to be protected, whatever it takes. And so I’m not afraid of anything, but of stopping or wavering to continue and protect ourselves through protecting the right of Ukrainians to live in their country, to have their own house intact, to have their children grow there, and to have a common future with everyone else, without being threatened to be wiped out from maps based on ninth, thirteenth, fifteenth, whatever century. Because if this Pandora box opens then I can tell you we have a lot of maps in this region, but we have to see the future, and it’s only the future that will unite us. So no, I don’t think that NATO will be weakened. I don’t think the United States will shy away from their role and from their leadership. I then that when elections will be over, American business is American business. MODERATOR: Next question is from Elja Zotka, journalist of Klan Television. QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Mr. Secretary, you did not touch upon the region and Kosovo in your remarks. Therefore, I wish to ask specifically a question about Kosovo. What is your view of the latest developments in Kosovo? How do you see the steps that have been taken in the dialogue with Serbia? Also the removal of dinar as the currency – do you see it as concerning, and also the fact that there is no steps being taken to establishing the associations? Well, Mr. Prime Minister, you already gave an answer, but I don’t know whether you’ve had – you have something to add when it comes to the situation in Kosovo. A second question for Mr. Secretary, if it is possible. You mentioned that you had a meeting with the heads of the justice institutions, and justice is a matter close to our heart as a people, because we’ve been missing it so far. Could you specifically speak about the message you imparted to the heads of our justice institutions on behalf of the U.S. in your although very brief meeting? Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you very much. When I started out working at the State Department and at the White House, now I’m afraid to say more than 30 years ago, the issue, the question, the challenge that was front and center – this is during President Clinton’s administration – was the Balkans, first Bosnia and Herzegovina, then Kosovo. And so many of us have a long and deep history, no one more so than the President of the United States, President Biden. And I think you know that history well. And so we’re strongly animated by the notion that we can’t go back to the future. We can’t have a repeat of what we saw and what too many people experienced in the 1990s, which is why we’re committed to supporting all of the efforts to advance the integration of countries in the Western Balkans, with each other and with Europe. With regard to Kosovo and Serbia more specifically, the EU-facilitated dialogue is the right – in fact, I think the only – path forward. And we’re committed to doing what we can to support both countries as they travel that path. But I also have to applaud Albania’s role in being a force for regional stability, for regional integration, for regional progress. That is the path that so clearly brings everyone to a better future. And we know what the alternative is because we’ve experienced it, we’ve seen it. So we’re resolute in doing everything we can in support of all the countries in the region taking that path. We very much support, as I said, the EU-facilitated dialogue. And we’ll work with Albania and others to try to help countries advance along that path. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Ditto. MODERATOR: Any comment? PRIME MINISTER RAMA: No, no, no. Ditto. MODERATOR: Next question is from Alexander Marquardt, CNN. QUESTION: Thank you very much. Mr. Secretary, you just said a moment ago that you think that a deal is possible, a humanitarian pause and a hostage deal. After the meeting that took place earlier this week in Cairo, do you think that that deal and a pause could be reached before Israel launches its expected offensive into Rafah? Do you think Prime Minister Netanyahu favors that Rafah offensive over reaching a hostage deal and a humanitarian pause? And then separately, two teenage American boys have now been killed in the West Bank in the past few weeks. An American woman was detained by Israeli forces in the West Bank. Two young American men were also detained by Israeli forces in Gaza. Have those detainees gotten U.S. consular access? Do you even know where those detainees are? And when it comes to the investigations into the teenagers’ deaths, where do those stand? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, Alex. QUESTION: And Mr. Secretary, may I ask the prime minister also a question? Albania recognized Palestine in 1988. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said earlier today that now is not the time to be speaking about gifts for the Palestinian people. Do you think that a two-state solution is still possible with the current Israeli Government, and how do you and the U.S. think that is achievable? Thank you both. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, Alex. So look, on the first question, I’m obviously not going to be speaking for the prime minister or telling you what his views may or may not be on these questions. You’ll have to ask him yourself or have others ask him. All I can tell you is this. As I said to Olivia’s question, we believe it must be and must remain a priority to do everything we can to bring the hostages home, to get them back with their loved ones, and that’s where our focus is. We’ve done a lot of work to try to get back to this point; that is where we think an agreement is possible, even if it – even if difficult. And at least from the perspective of the United States, we think it’s imperative that we continue to pursue that urgently. And as I said, that would bring many other benefits with it, and notably an extended pause to the conflict, an extended expansion of humanitarian assistance, all things that would be very, very welcome – more than welcome – by men, women, and children in Gaza who continue to suffer every single day. So that’s where our focus is, but in terms of timing, how one thing fits with another, you’ll have to ask the prime minister. Edi. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: Yes. QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, on the detainees — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Oh, I’m sorry. Yes, on the detainees – or this question – well, two things. First, with regard to American citizens who reportedly were killed, the first thing I would say is our deepest condolences to the families, to the loved ones, to the friends. You’ve heard me say this before, the President feels the same say: the safety, the security of American citizens around the world is our number one priority, our number one responsibility. And we’ve made clear that with regard to the instance you alluded to, there needs to be an investigation. We need to get the facts and, if appropriate, there needs to be accountability. With regard to detainees, there is a limit to what I can say because of the privacy laws and the requirements that flow from that. But I can just say in general, without reference to specific cases, we insist that people be treated fairly, that they be treated with due process, and that they be treated humanely. And that’s something that, regardless of where an American citizen might be detained, we insist on and will continue to insist on. Prime Minister. PRIME MINISTER RAMA: It’s in my humble view the hardest (inaudible) one can get. And the answer straightforward to your question: yes, Albania has recognized Palestine long ago. To give you a little background, Albania was a communist dictatorship, and our dictator was one of the closest friends and allies of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, PLO, and of Yasser Arafat. And on the other hand, our regime was very viciously against three major devils – United States, Soviet Union, and Israel, so in other words, American imperialism, Soviet social imperialism, and Jewish Zionism. But this country, on the other hand, is the only country in Europe that had more Jews after the Second World War than before, and it’s the only country where Jews didn’t fly out, but flew in to be protected. And as it is very well shown in Yad Vashem, it’s a country where the Nazis didn’t succeed to get a single Jew. This is the background. Now, of course, the situation is tragic because on one hand, Israel has its legitimate right to defend itself, but on the other hand, the destroyal and the loss of life on the Palestinian side are far too much to accept the escalation, the further escalation. And the trouble is that this further escalation is not an action that, at the end, by itself will wipe out Hamas or whatever form of Hamas may grow from the bottom of the rubbles. So for sure the two-state solutions – solution is the only way. But my humble opinion is that, in this situation, there are many things that have to happen at the same time. It’s not one thing. Because if one envisage a two-state solution now, just like one piece, then who will be on the Palestinian side? So the reform of Palestinian politics, the need for a body that would somehow represent all the Palestinian society and would be a credible interlocutor to all the parties involved, on one hand; on the other hand, a direct involvement of the Arab countries that are the most interested and those, and also at the same time, the most vulnerable, potentially, from the escalation of this conflict, to create an interforce that, together with Türkiye and under some guarantees of United States, would somehow make sure that what may be a Palestinian state will not be seen like a threat again for Israel. And of course all this without the liberation of hostages sounds very improbable. And at the end, last but not least, for sure I don’t envy the Secretary of State. MODERATOR: And now at the end, we would like to thank you all for being here today. Thank you. |
| United States Welcomes Uruguay’s Signing of the Artemis Accords |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 05:28 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson On February 15, 2024, Uruguay became the 36th signatory to the Artemis Accords, underscoring its commitment to the peaceful, safe, and transparent exploration and use of outer space. Uruguayan Foreign Minister Omar Paganini signed for Uruguay during a ceremony at NASA Headquarters in Washington in the presence of Uruguayan Ambassador to the United States Andrés Durán, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, U.S. Ambassador to Uruguay Heide Fulton, and Deputy Assistant Secretary Kevin Sullivan. The United States welcomes Uruguay as an esteemed partner in advancing our shared goals for peace, prosperity, and scientific discovery in space. Today, our countries held our second Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue where we strengthened our partnership on innovation, democracy, and educational exchanges. Our growing high-tech commercial ties and commitment to democracy are the foundation of our strong relationship. Together, we will continue to uphold the principles of the Artemis Accords and work towards a future of cooperation and exploration beyond Earth’s bounds. The Artemis Accords were established in 2020 by the United States and seven other countries. They set out a practical set of principles to guide space exploration. Uruguay joins 35 other nations – Angola, Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Czech Republic, Ecuador, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Romania, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States – in affirming the Accords’ principles for sustainable civil space activity. The Department of State and NASA lead the United States’ outreach and implementation of the Accords. For more information, please visit https://www.state.gov/ |
| Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with ROK First Vice Foreign Minister Kim |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 07:31 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The following is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell spoke with Republic of Korea First Vice Foreign Minister Kim Hong-kyun. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Vice Minister Kim said they looked forward to working together in their new roles and reaffirmed the importance of the U.S.-ROK Alliance and the U.S.-ROK-JPN trilateral relationship to security and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region and the world. The Deputy Secretary and Vice Minister condemned the DPRK’s provocative actions, its increasingly hostile rhetoric, and its transfer to Russia of ballistic missiles for use against the people of Ukraine. They committed to close cooperation on addressing the most serious regional and global challenges. The Deputy Secretary thanked the ROK for hosting the upcoming third Summit for Democracy and for taking up a leadership role on the global stage. |
| Joint Statement on the Second U.S.-Uruguay Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue |
| 02/15/2024 |
02/15/2024 08:48 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America and the Republic of Uruguay on the occasion of the Second U.S.-Uruguay Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue. Begin Text. The United States and Uruguay held their second Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue in Washington on February 15, 2024. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian A. Nichols and a U.S. delegation of six federal departments and agencies, welcomed Foreign Minister Omar Paganini and the Uruguayan delegation to Washington, D.C. Together, they agreed innovation and common purpose characterized the U.S.-Uruguay relationship and the opportunities that lie ahead. Building on the June 2023 meeting between President Biden and President Lacalle Pou, the delegations affirmed their common commitment to democratic governance, regional integration, inclusive economic growth, and expanding opportunity through sustainable trade and investment. With a focus on innovation, the two sides highlighted how their economies work together to create jobs, raise the standard of living, and grow next generation industries. The U.S delegation praised Uruguay’s impressive leadership within the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity, particularly its active role through the Uruguay Innovation Hub program, the start-up accelerator, and green hydrogen. The Uruguayan delegation thanked the United States for hosting the Americas Partnership Leaders’ Summit at the White House and underscored its efforts to lead an angel investor network. The Uruguayan delegation announced Uruguay’s signing of the Artemis Accords, and the United States agreed to support Uruguay exploring civilian and commercial space industries. The United States and Uruguay also reaffirmed their shared commitment to the Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation as an engine of Atlantic regional integration with an emphasis on economic development, environmental protection, and scientific exchange. The two sides also discussed bilateral trade and investment and agreed to further improve bilateral trade and investment conditions, including an expedited resolution for the ongoing review of agricultural sanitary processes. Both delegations recognized progress towards a Trilateral Cooperation agreement between USAID and the International Cooperation Agency of Uruguay (AUCI) to collaborate on development projects in third countries in the region, with the commitment to finalize a Memorandum of Understanding in the near future. The United States acknowledged Uruguay’s request for assistance with a supply of sterile flies and committed to reevaluating the request in the future and analyzing other options to implement the program as soon as possible. The two sides explored innovative solutions to improve security conditions in the region. They agreed to strengthen collaboration in fighting transnational crime and drug trafficking through drug interdiction, law enforcement training, drug treatment and demand reduction programs. Finally, they discussed the importance of securing regional support for the Multinational Security Support Mission to Haiti. The U.S. and Uruguayan delegations also signed a modernized Memorandum of Understanding for the U.S.-Uruguay Fulbright Program, establishing a stable annual allocation from both countries. The United States noted Uruguay’s progress toward eligibility for the Visa Waiver Program and reaffirmed its continued support of Uruguay’s efforts. Moreover, both delegations celebrated the signing of the U.S.- Uruguay Global Entry Joint Statement that expressed their commitment for a prompt accession of Uruguay to the Global Entry Program. The United States recognized Uruguay’s leadership on the international stage, including its votes on resolutions at the United Nations, its clear and consistent criticism of Russia’s unjust war against Ukraine, and its support for the Barbados electoral roadmap agreement to achieve a return to democracy in Venezuela. The Uruguayan delegation thanked the United States for its warm hospitality and commended the successful organization of the Annual Bilateral Inter-Ministerial Dialogue. Both sides reaffirmed their desire to continue working closely together at the bilateral, regional, and international levels. The Uruguayan delegation invited the United States to Uruguay for the next annual meeting in 2025. End Text. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Travel to Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro, and Buenos Aires |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 08:23 AM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken will travel to Brasilia and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Buenos Aires, Argentina, February 20-23. In Brasilia, Secretary Blinken will meet with President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to discuss bilateral and global issues. The Secretary will emphasize U.S. support for Brazil’s G20 presidency and hosting of the G20 Foreign Ministers Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, the U.S.-Brazil Partnership for Workers Rights, cooperation on the clean energy transition, and commemorations for the bicentennial of diplomatic relations between Brazil and the United States. In Rio de Janeiro, Secretary Blinken will attend the G20 Foreign Ministers Meeting to engage world leaders on our shared initiatives for increasing peace and stability, promoting social inclusion, reducing inequality, ending hunger, countering the climate crisis, promoting clean energy transition and sustainable development, and making global governance more effective. The Secretary also plans to engage G20 partners and other key actors on international efforts to support the Haitian people. In Buenos Aires, Secretary Blinken will meet with Argentine President Javier Milei to discuss bilateral and global issues including sustainable economic growth, our shared commitment to human rights and democratic governance, critical minerals, and enhancing trade and investment that benefits both two countries. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolaj Denkov Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:00 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good morning, everyone. It’s so good to have our Bulgarian colleagues here with us today. I’m very much looking forward to this meeting. Bulgaria is an extraordinary partner for the United States, for Europe. We see that playing out every single day in a whole variety of ways, but we are working together to rapidly increase our civil nuclear cooperation. Of course, we’re also working on military modernization, including with F-16s, with Strykers, and most significantly as well continuing to deepen integration between Bulgaria, the European Union, and NATO. I want to thank you, all of the leadership, for the extraordinary assistance that Bulgaria has provided to Ukraine, and continues to provide every single day – leadership for security, for stability – both with regard to Ukraine, but more broadly, the entire Black Sea region. And we see that, of course, in the military and humanitarian assistance that Bulgaria has provided; now the trilateral mine clearing that’s underway with Romania and Türkiye; and the genuine, real, powerful support for Ukrainians who have been forced to flee their homes as a result of the Russian aggression. And finally, I would note the important work that we’re doing together to counter disinformation – a front in conflict that demands our attention. So with that and in so many more ways, we’re grateful for you partnership, for the Alliance, and grateful for the opportunity to speak today. PRIME MINISTER DENKOV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. In the beginning of the Russian war in Ukraine, the position of Bulgaria became very important as part of Europe. So, what we see is that Bulgaria is a key country for the defense and deterrence efforts in the Black Sea region. Also, eastern (inaudible) NATO, what we see is that these capabilities should be upgraded – the mobility from (inaudible) to the north; the gas transit, again, from this region to the Central and Eastern Europe. So, these are all problematic issues today that can be also used as opportunities to develop the region, and with the Bulgarian and the other Allies of NATO, the place to be sure that this is a stable region. And we are very much committed, and that’s why we are here with many (inaudible) as well to work together and to place Bulgaria where it belongs to, and this is the structures of Europe and the structure of NATO, and to be reliable partners there. And thank you very much for what you have done in the past. We remember very well how important was your support, when Russia stopped the gas supply to Bulgaria. And then you were there to help us, and we can rely on U.S. in the future. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much. Thanks, everyone. |
| Joint Statement from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:19 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Canada on coordinated efforts to counter foreign state information manipulation. Begin Text: The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada remain deeply concerned about foreign information manipulation and other actions designed to undermine our democracies and human rights globally. Foreign information manipulation is a national security threat that undermines democratic values, human rights, governmental processes, and political stability. Given the borderless nature of information manipulation, we call on all like-minded countries committed to the rules-based order to work together to identify and counter this threat. Securing the integrity of the global information ecosystem is central to popular confidence in governance institutions and processes, trust in elected leaders, and the preservation of democracy. The present international system, based on international law and respect for territorial boundaries, is competing with an alternate vision defined by autocratic impunity. This alternate vision deploys foreign malign influence aimed at undermining our safety and security, with disregard for universal human rights and the rule of law. The time is now for a collective approach to the foreign information manipulation threat that builds a coalition of like-minded countries committed to strengthening resilience and response to information manipulation. We can do this through coordinated, whole of society solutions that work with experts, independent media and multilateral organizations, to address these transnational security threats. That is why today, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada jointly endorse the Framework to Counter Foreign State Information Manipulation, which affirms our shared understanding of the threat and offers a holistic view of how to address the foreign information manipulation challenge. It aims to standardize our approach to this problem and build interoperable and complementary systems to resist this threat as technologies continue to emerge and adapt. The Framework complements the high-level international commitments from the Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online and reinforces our joint efforts and commitment to protect and promote information integrity. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada intend to collaborate on building partner countries’ resilience to foreign information manipulation by advancing the Framework’s Key Action Areas: National Strategies and Policies; Governance Structures and Institutions; Capacity; Civil Society, Independent Media, and Academia; and Multilateral Engagement. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada intend to jointly work on operationalizing relevant Key Action Areas through new and existing multilateral mechanisms, such as the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism , and in coordination with other likeminded partners and multilateral organizations. End Text. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolaj Denkov Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:00 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good morning, everyone. It’s so good to have our Bulgarian colleagues here with us today. I’m very much looking forward to this meeting. Bulgaria is an extraordinary partner for the United States, for Europe. We see that playing out every single day in a whole variety of ways, but we are working together to rapidly increase our civil nuclear cooperation. Of course, we’re also working on military modernization, including with F-16s, with Strykers, and most significantly as well continuing to deepen integration between Bulgaria, the European Union, and NATO. I want to thank you, all of the leadership, for the extraordinary assistance that Bulgaria has provided to Ukraine, and continues to provide every single day – leadership for security, for stability – both with regard to Ukraine, but more broadly, the entire Black Sea region. And we see that, of course, in the military and humanitarian assistance that Bulgaria has provided; now the trilateral mine clearing that’s underway with Romania and Türkiye; and the genuine, real, powerful support for Ukrainians who have been forced to flee their homes as a result of the Russian aggression. And finally, I would note the important work that we’re doing together to counter disinformation – a front in conflict that demands our attention. So with that and in so many more ways, we’re grateful for you partnership, for the Alliance, and grateful for the opportunity to speak today. PRIME MINISTER DENKOV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. In the beginning of the Russian war in Ukraine, the position of Bulgaria became very important as part of Europe. So, what we see is that Bulgaria is a key country for the defense and deterrence efforts in the Black Sea region. Also, eastern (inaudible) NATO, what we see is that these capabilities should be upgraded – the mobility from (inaudible) to the north; the gas transit, again, from this region to the Central and Eastern Europe. So, these are all problematic issues today that can be also used as opportunities to develop the region, and with the Bulgarian and the other Allies of NATO, the place to be sure that this is a stable region. And we are very much committed, and that’s why we are here with many (inaudible) as well to work together and to place Bulgaria where it belongs to, and this is the structures of Europe and the structure of NATO, and to be reliable partners there. And thank you very much for what you have done in the past. We remember very well how important was your support, when Russia stopped the gas supply to Bulgaria. And then you were there to help us, and we can rely on U.S. in the future. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much. Thanks, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolaj Denkov Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:00 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good morning, everyone. It’s so good to have our Bulgarian colleagues here with us today. I’m very much looking forward to this meeting. Bulgaria is an extraordinary partner for the United States, for Europe. We see that playing out every single day in a whole variety of ways, but we are working together to rapidly increase our civil nuclear cooperation. Of course, we’re also working on military modernization, including with F-16s, with Strykers, and most significantly as well continuing to deepen integration between Bulgaria, the European Union, and NATO. I want to thank you, all of the leadership, for the extraordinary assistance that Bulgaria has provided to Ukraine, and continues to provide every single day – leadership for security, for stability – both with regard to Ukraine, but more broadly, the entire Black Sea region. And we see that, of course, in the military and humanitarian assistance that Bulgaria has provided; now the trilateral mine clearing that’s underway with Romania and Türkiye; and the genuine, real, powerful support for Ukrainians who have been forced to flee their homes as a result of the Russian aggression. And finally, I would note the important work that we’re doing together to counter disinformation – a front in conflict that demands our attention. So with that and in so many more ways, we’re grateful for you partnership, for the Alliance, and grateful for the opportunity to speak today. PRIME MINISTER DENKOV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. In the beginning of the Russian war in Ukraine, the position of Bulgaria became very important as part of Europe. So, what we see is that Bulgaria is a key country for the defense and deterrence efforts in the Black Sea region. Also, eastern (inaudible) NATO, what we see is that these capabilities should be upgraded – the mobility from (inaudible) to the north; the gas transit, again, from this region to the Central and Eastern Europe. So, these are all problematic issues today that can be also used as opportunities to develop the region, and with the Bulgarian and the other Allies of NATO, the place to be sure that this is a stable region. And we are very much committed, and that’s why we are here with many (inaudible) as well to work together and to place Bulgaria where it belongs to, and this is the structures of Europe and the structure of NATO, and to be reliable partners there. And thank you very much for what you have done in the past. We remember very well how important was your support, when Russia stopped the gas supply to Bulgaria. And then you were there to help us, and we can rely on U.S. in the future. Thank you. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you so much. Thanks, everyone. |
| Joint Statement from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada on Countering Foreign Information Manipulation |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:19 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The text of the following statement was released by the Governments of the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and Canada on coordinated efforts to counter foreign state information manipulation. Begin Text: The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada remain deeply concerned about foreign information manipulation and other actions designed to undermine our democracies and human rights globally. Foreign information manipulation is a national security threat that undermines democratic values, human rights, governmental processes, and political stability. Given the borderless nature of information manipulation, we call on all like-minded countries committed to the rules-based order to work together to identify and counter this threat. Securing the integrity of the global information ecosystem is central to popular confidence in governance institutions and processes, trust in elected leaders, and the preservation of democracy. The present international system, based on international law and respect for territorial boundaries, is competing with an alternate vision defined by autocratic impunity. This alternate vision deploys foreign malign influence aimed at undermining our safety and security, with disregard for universal human rights and the rule of law. The time is now for a collective approach to the foreign information manipulation threat that builds a coalition of like-minded countries committed to strengthening resilience and response to information manipulation. We can do this through coordinated, whole of society solutions that work with experts, independent media and multilateral organizations, to address these transnational security threats. That is why today, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada jointly endorse the Framework to Counter Foreign State Information Manipulation, which affirms our shared understanding of the threat and offers a holistic view of how to address the foreign information manipulation challenge. It aims to standardize our approach to this problem and build interoperable and complementary systems to resist this threat as technologies continue to emerge and adapt. The Framework complements the high-level international commitments from the Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online and reinforces our joint efforts and commitment to protect and promote information integrity. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada intend to collaborate on building partner countries’ resilience to foreign information manipulation by advancing the Framework’s Key Action Areas: National Strategies and Policies; Governance Structures and Institutions; Capacity; Civil Society, Independent Media, and Academia; and Multilateral Engagement. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada intend to jointly work on operationalizing relevant Key Action Areas through new and existing multilateral mechanisms, such as the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism , and in coordination with other likeminded partners and multilateral organizations. End Text. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:50 AM EST Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good afternoon. We’ve heard the reports from Russia of Aleksey Navalny’s death in prison. For more than a decade, Russian Government, Putin, have persecuted, poisoned, and imprisoned Aleksey Navalny, and now reports of his death. First and foremost, if these reports are accurate, our hearts go out to his wife and to his family. Beyond that, his death in a Russian prison and the fixation and fear of one man only underscores the weakness and rot at the heart of the system that Putin has built. Russia is responsible for this. We’ll be talking to many other countries concerned about Aleksey Navalny, and especially if these reports bear out to be true. On a much different note, I’m very pleased to be with my friend and colleague, the external affairs minister of India. We have an extraordinary partnership between the United States and India that has grown stronger and stronger in recent years, stronger than it’s ever been, and it is for us among the most consequential relationships of any in the world. We’re working closely on a whole host of vital priorities that are making a difference in the lives of people in India and people in the United States: increasing mutual prosperity, advancing democracy and human rights, addressing climate change, upholding together the rules-based international order. This work is not just the work of a day or a single meeting, it’s the work of every day, but it’s important to be able to take stock of where we are as well as the many challenges that we’re facing, India and the United States together, both in the region and in the world. So, I look forward to comparing notes with you about all of that. Thank you, my friend. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. Well, let me just add my words of welcome to the Secretary. Tony, good to see you, and there’s a lot that we need to talk about. I’m coming out of the Middle East, myself, been monitoring your travels and efforts there. I think it’s important today that the very complicated issues there be addressed in an effective manner and the conflict does not escalate. And, of course, a whole host of other issues – issues in this part of the world, issues in the Indo-Pacific – that we need to talk about. Very glad to have this opportunity. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:50 AM EST Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good afternoon. We’ve heard the reports from Russia of Aleksey Navalny’s death in prison. For more than a decade, Russian Government, Putin, have persecuted, poisoned, and imprisoned Aleksey Navalny, and now reports of his death. First and foremost, if these reports are accurate, our hearts go out to his wife and to his family. Beyond that, his death in a Russian prison and the fixation and fear of one man only underscores the weakness and rot at the heart of the system that Putin has built. Russia is responsible for this. We’ll be talking to many other countries concerned about Aleksey Navalny, and especially if these reports bear out to be true. On a much different note, I’m very pleased to be with my friend and colleague, the external affairs minister of India. We have an extraordinary partnership between the United States and India that has grown stronger and stronger in recent years, stronger than it’s ever been, and it is for us among the most consequential relationships of any in the world. We’re working closely on a whole host of vital priorities that are making a difference in the lives of people in India and people in the United States: increasing mutual prosperity, advancing democracy and human rights, addressing climate change, upholding together the rules-based international order. This work is not just the work of a day or a single meeting, it’s the work of every day, but it’s important to be able to take stock of where we are as well as the many challenges that we’re facing, India and the United States together, both in the region and in the world. So, I look forward to comparing notes with you about all of that. Thank you, my friend. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. Well, let me just add my words of welcome to the Secretary. Tony, good to see you, and there’s a lot that we need to talk about. I’m coming out of the Middle East, myself, been monitoring your travels and efforts there. I think it’s important today that the very complicated issues there be addressed in an effective manner and the conflict does not escalate. And, of course, a whole host of other issues – issues in this part of the world, issues in the Indo-Pacific – that we need to talk about. Very glad to have this opportunity. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:50 AM EST Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good afternoon. We’ve heard the reports from Russia of Aleksey Navalny’s death in prison. For more than a decade, Russian Government, Putin, have persecuted, poisoned, and imprisoned Aleksey Navalny, and now reports of his death. First and foremost, if these reports are accurate, our hearts go out to his wife and to his family. Beyond that, his death in a Russian prison and the fixation and fear of one man only underscores the weakness and rot at the heart of the system that Putin has built. Russia is responsible for this. We’ll be talking to many other countries concerned about Aleksey Navalny, and especially if these reports bear out to be true. On a much different note, I’m very pleased to be with my friend and colleague, the external affairs minister of India. We have an extraordinary partnership between the United States and India that has grown stronger and stronger in recent years, stronger than it’s ever been, and it is for us among the most consequential relationships of any in the world. We’re working closely on a whole host of vital priorities that are making a difference in the lives of people in India and people in the United States: increasing mutual prosperity, advancing democracy and human rights, addressing climate change, upholding together the rules-based international order. This work is not just the work of a day or a single meeting, it’s the work of every day, but it’s important to be able to take stock of where we are as well as the many challenges that we’re facing, India and the United States together, both in the region and in the world. So, I look forward to comparing notes with you about all of that. Thank you, my friend. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. Well, let me just add my words of welcome to the Secretary. Tony, good to see you, and there’s a lot that we need to talk about. I’m coming out of the Middle East, myself, been monitoring your travels and efforts there. I think it’s important today that the very complicated issues there be addressed in an effective manner and the conflict does not escalate. And, of course, a whole host of other issues – issues in this part of the world, issues in the Indo-Pacific – that we need to talk about. Very glad to have this opportunity. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. EXTERNAL AFFAIRS MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Thank you. |
| Acting Assistant Secretary Littlejohn’s Travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 10:31 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Jennifer R. Littlejohn will travel to Oman, Ghana, and Kenya from February 16 to February 29, 2024. During her visit, she will discuss nature and marine conservation, plastic pollution, the climate crisis, deforestation, nature crimes, civil and commercial space activities, and the sustainable blue economy. She will co-represent the United States with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative at meetings in Oman focused on Free Trade Agreement Environment Chapter implementation and on environmental cooperation. In Ghana, she will meet with partners, visit U.S.-supported projects helping to rebuild and protect Ghana’s coastal fisheries, and engage with university students studying environmental issues. In Kenya, she will lead the U.S. Delegation to the Sixth UN Environment Assembly to promote global cooperation to address shared environmental challenges, promote gender equality; and address global issues such as the climate, biodiversity, and pollution crises. She will also discuss opportunities for space cooperation with Kenyan officials. For media inquiries, please contact oes-press@state.gov. |
| Special Representative Hachigian’s Travel to Munich and Barcelona |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 11:29 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Nina Hachigian will travel to Munich, Germany, February 15-18 and to Barcelona, Spain, February 18-21 to attend the Munich Security Conference and the 2024 United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) Retreat. At the Munich Security Conference , Ambassador Hachigian will join Mayor Vitali Klitschko of Kyiv, Ukraine, for a panel discussion titled The Role of Subnational Diplomacy in International Security on February 16. She will highlight recent accomplishments of her office, the Subnational Diplomacy Unit, and the importance of strong subnational ties during conflicts like Russia’s war against Ukraine. In Barcelona, Ambassador Hachigian will deliver remarks at the UCLG Retreat’s opening plenary on February 19. She will discuss the importance of local governments and multilateral action in addressing global threats. To keep up with the Subnational Diplomacy Unit and Ambassador Hachigian, follow along on X at @SubnationalDip. For media inquiries and questions, please contact: Subnational@state.gov |
| Special Representative Hachigian’s Travel to Munich and Barcelona |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 11:29 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson Special Representative for City and State Diplomacy Ambassador Nina Hachigian will travel to Munich, Germany, February 15-18 and to Barcelona, Spain, February 18-21 to attend the Munich Security Conference and the 2024 United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) Retreat. At the Munich Security Conference , Ambassador Hachigian will join Mayor Vitali Klitschko of Kyiv, Ukraine, for a panel discussion titled The Role of Subnational Diplomacy in International Security on February 16. She will highlight recent accomplishments of her office, the Subnational Diplomacy Unit, and the importance of strong subnational ties during conflicts like Russia’s war against Ukraine. In Barcelona, Ambassador Hachigian will deliver remarks at the UCLG Retreat’s opening plenary on February 19. She will discuss the importance of local governments and multilateral action in addressing global threats. To keep up with the Subnational Diplomacy Unit and Ambassador Hachigian, follow along on X at @SubnationalDip. For media inquiries and questions, please contact: Subnational@state.gov |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bulgarian Prime Minister Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 12:44 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met today with Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolai Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mariya Gabriel to discuss our strong bilateral relationship and shared global interests. The Secretary congratulated Prime Minister Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel on the recently signed U.S.-Bulgaria civil nuclear agreement and Bulgaria’s diversification of its energy sources. Secretary Blinken, Prime Minister Denkov, and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel discussed the importance of ensuring the safety of commercial shipping through the Red Sea. They reaffirmed steadfast support for Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia’s brutal aggression and underscored our unwavering commitment to the mutual defense and national security of all our NATO Allies. They also addressed the growing vitality of the Black Sea region, including multilateral initiatives for enhancing long-term stability and Bulgaria’s growing role in promoting energy security in Europe. |
| Under Secretary Elizabeth M. Allen’s Travel to Jordan, Sri Lanka, and India |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 12:35 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Liz Allen is on travel to Jordan, Sri Lanka, and India from February 12-22. The visit underscores the United States’ unwavering commitment to reinforcing and expanding partnerships and alliances. The trip highlights the core of U.S. foreign policy and public diplomacy initiatives: fostering freedom of expression, economic empowerment, and global collaboration. In Jordan, Under Secretary Allen engaged with alumni of U.S. public diplomacy programs and civil society leaders, gaining valuable insights into regional perspectives. She explored the transformative impact of English Language programs on Jordanian youth, which equip them with essential skills for the labor market. She also met with State Department public affairs professionals and Government of Jordan officials to discuss integrated, innovative strategic communications as a tool of national security. After Jordan, Under Secretary Allen will travel to Colombo, Sri Lanka to reaffirm U.S. support for Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific. Her agenda includes fostering dialogue on freedom of expression and democratic values with diverse groups of stakeholders, including journalists, civil society members, government officials, and the Embassy’s Youth Forum. Her engagements with the Sri Lanka Press Institute, U.S. public diplomacy program alumni, and local content creators will emphasize the critical role of preserving diverse voices for a stable and inclusive Sri Lanka. Additionally, she will meet with representatives from Sri Lanka’s multifaith community to underscore the importance of societal inclusivity. Finally, in Mumbai, India, Under Secretary Allen will focus on increasing women’s participation in the formal economic sector. Her discussions with business leaders and U.S. government-funded program alumni will support the United States’ strategic and sustained collaboration with the U.S.-Indian diaspora, corporations, academia, and the business sector to advance women’s economic empowerment. Her participation in a panel discussion at the University of Mumbai will shed light on the dynamic U.S.-India partnership, exploring how bilateral cooperation can yield substantial benefits for both nations and the wider region in the coming decade. To stay up to date, follow Under Secretary Allen on Twitter/X: @UnderSecPD. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Bulgarian Prime Minister Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 12:44 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met today with Bulgarian Prime Minister Nikolai Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mariya Gabriel to discuss our strong bilateral relationship and shared global interests. The Secretary congratulated Prime Minister Denkov and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel on the recently signed U.S.-Bulgaria civil nuclear agreement and Bulgaria’s diversification of its energy sources. Secretary Blinken, Prime Minister Denkov, and Deputy Prime Minister Gabriel discussed the importance of ensuring the safety of commercial shipping through the Red Sea. They reaffirmed steadfast support for Ukraine as it defends itself against Russia’s brutal aggression and underscored our unwavering commitment to the mutual defense and national security of all our NATO Allies. They also addressed the growing vitality of the Black Sea region, including multilateral initiatives for enhancing long-term stability and Bulgaria’s growing role in promoting energy security in Europe. |
| Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Bitter Travels to Salt Lake City, Utah |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 12:54 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Rena Bitter will travel to Salt Lake City, Utah, on February 16 to observe a Congressional passport acceptance event for residents of Utah. She will also meet with community leaders to discuss how the Bureau of Consular Affairs serves U.S. citizens, strengthens national security, and promotes economic opportunities. This visit underscores the Department of State’s commitment to provide passport services to the American people. |
| Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Verma’s Travel to India, Maldives, and Sri Lanka |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 12:47 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard R. Verma will travel to India, Maldives, and Sri Lanka on February 18-23 to strengthen the United States’ cooperation with each of these key Indo-Pacific partners. Shortly following the two-year anniversary of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy, his trip will reaffirm the United States’ enduring commitment to a free, open, secure, and prosperous region. In New Delhi, India, Deputy Secretary Verma will meet with senior government officials, business leaders, and entrepreneurs to advance the U.S.-Indian global strategic partnership on a full range of issues, including economic development, security, and technology. From India, Deputy Secretary Verma will travel to Malé, Maldives, to meet with senior officials and advance shared priorities in increasing economic cooperation and promoting maritime security. The Deputy Secretary will also tour the planned office space for a new U.S. Embassy in Malé, which will help further increase people-to-people ties between the United States and Maldives. Deputy Secretary Verma will conclude his trip in Colombo, Sri Lanka. His meetings with senior officials will support U.S.-Sri Lankan defense and maritime security cooperation. The Deputy Secretary will visit the Port of Colombo’s West Container Terminal, where the United States is supporting Sri Lanka’s ongoing economic recovery through $553 million in financing to transform Colombo into a regional shipping hub. Finally, he will meet with civil society leaders to hear their perspective on democratic governance in Sri Lanka and with government officials to voice U.S. support for the protection of free speech and open discourse. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with People’s Republic of China Director of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Foreign Affairs Commission and Foreign Minister Wang Yi |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 01:10 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with PRC Director of the CCP Central Foreign Affairs Commission and Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Munich on the margins of the Munich Security Conference on February 16. The two sides had a candid and constructive discussion on a range of bilateral, regional, and global issues as part of ongoing efforts to maintain open lines of communication and responsibly manage competition in the relationship. The Secretary emphasized the importance of continuing to implement the progress made by the two Presidents at the Woodside Summit, including on counternarcotics cooperation and military-to-military communications. The Secretary reiterated that the United States will stand up for our interests and values and those of our allies and partners. The Secretary emphasized the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and in the South China Sea. The two sides had substantive discussions on a range of regional and global issues. The Secretary raised concerns over the PRC’s support for Russia’s war against Ukraine, including support to the Russian defense industrial base. The two sides also exchanged views on the situation in the Middle East and on the Korean Peninsula and affirmed that their respective senior officials should meet to follow up on these discussions. The Secretary discussed his recent travel in the Middle East and U.S. diplomatic efforts in the region. Both sides recognized the importance of maintaining open lines of communication between the United States and the PRC across a range of strategic issues, including consultations and high-level meetings in key areas in the coming months. |
| Assistant Secretary Phee’s Travel to Somalia |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 01:24 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Molly Phee and Special Envoy for the Horn of Africa Mike Hammer visited Mogadishu, Somalia February 15-16, 2024. In a meeting with President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, they discussed the current state of play in the region and the importance of avoiding further tensions. They reiterated U.S. support for Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and discussed the importance of counterterrorism efforts and planning for a seamless transition from the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) to a new multinational force post-ATMIS. Assistant Secretary Phee and President Hassan Sheikh presided over the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding for the construction of facilities for the Somali National Army’s “Danab” advanced infantry brigade, a cornerstone of the U.S.-Somalia security partnership. In a meeting with Somali parliamentarians, the delegation discussed the importance of inclusive and transparent constitutional reform. The delegation also met international partners to discuss shared interests in promoting security and stability in Somalia. Assistant Secretary Phee recognized International Woman of Courage nominee LTC Iman Elman for her courageous leadership of the Somali National Army’s Civil Affairs Directorate and life-long advocate for peace, human rights, and dignity. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with German Vice Chancellor and Economic Minister Habeck |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:03 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with German Vice Chancellor and Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Robert Habeck at the Munich Security Conference. Secretary Blinken and Vice Chancellor Habeck discussed support for Ukraine and ongoing efforts to establish lasting peace and security in the Middle East. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:17 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good evening, everyone, and it’s a great pleasure for me to have the opportunity to see the vice chancellor again. It’s quite simple for the United States: Germany is our indispensable ally and partner. And on virtually every single challenge we’re facing, whether it’s regional, whether it’s global, we are together. And because of that, we’re stronger. So, I’m looking forward to covering many of the most immediate challenges with the vice chancellor and really appreciate this opportunity to spend some time together. Robert. VICE CHANCELLOR HABECK: Antony, thank you very much for having me and thanks for the opportunity to discuss the difficult situations we are having worldwide. I’d like to start with thank you for your leadership, also the U.S., but also personal. I think what you have done, what you’re doing to ease the situation, especially in the Middle East, is outstanding. And looking east of Munich to Ukraine and to Russia, I mean, it’s the day Navalny died. I remember that a leading politician of the last government told me the evening before he was going back to Moscow, she visited him and said don’t do it, it will cost you your life. And he did it, and this is – it’s for me hard to find the right words. It’s a tragedy, really. But that means that we have to stay strong also, in the continuing fight helping Ukraine and that Russia not win this terrible war. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:17 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good evening, everyone, and it’s a great pleasure for me to have the opportunity to see the vice chancellor again. It’s quite simple for the United States: Germany is our indispensable ally and partner. And on virtually every single challenge we’re facing, whether it’s regional, whether it’s global, we are together. And because of that, we’re stronger. So, I’m looking forward to covering many of the most immediate challenges with the vice chancellor and really appreciate this opportunity to spend some time together. Robert. VICE CHANCELLOR HABECK: Antony, thank you very much for having me and thanks for the opportunity to discuss the difficult situations we are having worldwide. I’d like to start with thank you for your leadership, also the U.S., but also personal. I think what you have done, what you’re doing to ease the situation, especially in the Middle East, is outstanding. And looking east of Munich to Ukraine and to Russia, I mean, it’s the day Navalny died. I remember that a leading politician of the last government told me the evening before he was going back to Moscow, she visited him and said don’t do it, it will cost you your life. And he did it, and this is – it’s for me hard to find the right words. It’s a tragedy, really. But that means that we have to stay strong also, in the continuing fight helping Ukraine and that Russia not win this terrible war. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. |
| Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Munich |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:17 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Ambassador Bonnie D. Jenkins will travel to Munich, Germany, from February 16 to 18, 2024, to participate in the 60th Munich Security Conference. At the conference, the Under Secretary will hold bilateral meetings, attend side events, and engage with members of civil society and the media. The Under Secretary will also serve as a panelist, speaking on issues related to international security. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with German Vice Chancellor and Economic Minister Habeck |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:03 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with German Vice Chancellor and Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Robert Habeck at the Munich Security Conference. Secretary Blinken and Vice Chancellor Habeck discussed support for Ukraine and ongoing efforts to establish lasting peace and security in the Middle East. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck Before Their Meeting |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:17 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Bayerischer Hof Munich, Germany SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good evening, everyone, and it’s a great pleasure for me to have the opportunity to see the vice chancellor again. It’s quite simple for the United States: Germany is our indispensable ally and partner. And on virtually every single challenge we’re facing, whether it’s regional, whether it’s global, we are together. And because of that, we’re stronger. So, I’m looking forward to covering many of the most immediate challenges with the vice chancellor and really appreciate this opportunity to spend some time together. Robert. VICE CHANCELLOR HABECK: Antony, thank you very much for having me and thanks for the opportunity to discuss the difficult situations we are having worldwide. I’d like to start with thank you for your leadership, also the U.S., but also personal. I think what you have done, what you’re doing to ease the situation, especially in the Middle East, is outstanding. And looking east of Munich to Ukraine and to Russia, I mean, it’s the day Navalny died. I remember that a leading politician of the last government told me the evening before he was going back to Moscow, she visited him and said don’t do it, it will cost you your life. And he did it, and this is – it’s for me hard to find the right words. It’s a tragedy, really. But that means that we have to stay strong also, in the continuing fight helping Ukraine and that Russia not win this terrible war. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you. |
| Under Secretary Jenkins Travels to Munich |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 02:17 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Ambassador Bonnie D. Jenkins will travel to Munich, Germany, from February 16 to 18, 2024, to participate in the 60th Munich Security Conference. At the conference, the Under Secretary will hold bilateral meetings, attend side events, and engage with members of civil society and the media. The Under Secretary will also serve as a panelist, speaking on issues related to international security. |
| Promoting Accountability for the Ortega-Murillo Regime for Restricting Freedoms |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 03:06 PM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson The Department of State today took additional actions to promote accountability for those involved in the Ortega-Murillo government’s relentless attacks on the human rights and fundamental freedoms of Nicaraguans. We are taking steps to impose visa restrictions on more than 100 Nicaraguan municipal officials for their role in the Ortega-Murillo government, which continues to engage in a repressive campaign that silences civil society and unjustly detains courageous individuals for exercising their fundamental freedoms. We continue to work with the international community to promote accountability for those threatening democracy in Nicaragua. We remain committed to supporting the Nicaraguan people and ensuring their human rights are protected. This action was taken pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 10309, which suspends entry into the United States as immigrants and nonimmigrants of persons responsible for policies or actions that threaten democracy in Nicaragua. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Indian External Affairs Minister Jaishankar |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 04:09 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar today in Munich, Germany, on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference. Secretary Blinken and External Affairs Minister Jaishankar discussed the need to ensure freedom of navigation in the Red Sea. Secretary Blinken highlighted that the respective U.S. and Indian approaches to maritime security in the Red Sea are mutually reinforcing and play important roles in safeguarding economic stability in the region. The Secretary and External Affairs Minister also discussed ongoing work to ensure lasting peace and security in the Middle East. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Indian External Affairs Minister Jaishankar |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 04:09 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar today in Munich, Germany, on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference. Secretary Blinken and External Affairs Minister Jaishankar discussed the need to ensure freedom of navigation in the Red Sea. Secretary Blinken highlighted that the respective U.S. and Indian approaches to maritime security in the Red Sea are mutually reinforcing and play important roles in safeguarding economic stability in the region. The Secretary and External Affairs Minister also discussed ongoing work to ensure lasting peace and security in the Middle East. |
| Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian A. Nichols and Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui Previewing Secretary Blinken’s Upcoming Travel to Argentina and Brazil |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 04:28 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson Via Teleconference MR TEK: Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our call today previewing the Secretary of State’s travel to Brazil and Argentina. This call will be on the record and is embargoed until its conclusion. Joining us today are Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Brian A. Nichols and Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs Ramin Toloui. We’ll take brief opening remarks from each of our speakers and then we’ll turn it over to your questions. And so with that, let’s turn it over to AS Nichols to kick us off. Sir. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: Thank you so much, Nathan, and great to be with my colleague, Assistant Secretary Ramin Toloui, today to preview Secretary Blinken’s travel to Brazil and Argentina. During this trip, the Secretary will meet with two key partners in the Americas to discuss a range of shared priorities. On February 20th the Secretary will travel to Brasília to meet with President Lula. They’ll discuss crucial bilateral regional, and global issues and celebrate the bicentennial of diplomatic relations between our two countries. The Secretary will focus on several shared priorities, including the United States’ support for Brazil’s G20 presidency, the U.S.-Brazil Partnership on Worker’s Rights, and cooperation on the Clean Energy Transition. In Rio de Janeiro, Secretary Blinken will attend the G20 Foreign Minister’s meeting. On the margins of the meeting, the Secretary will engage G20 partners and others on the Multinational Security Support Mission to Haiti, a key effort that responds to the call from the Haitian people for help to restore security and stability. On February 22nd the Secretary will travel to Buenos Aires to meet with President Javier Milei. They will discuss multiple areas of shared interest, including sustainable economic growth, economic prosperity, human rights, the importance of democratic governance, deepening cooperation on energy and critical minerals, and trade investment opportunities between our two countries. Brazil and Argentina are two of our most important partners in the Americas. The breadth and depth of our relations allows us to work together to enhance regional and global security and to achieve inclusive economic growth and prosperity for our peoples through trade and investment. We look forward to engaging with President Lula and President Milei next week. Thanks and over to you, Ramin. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: Thank you Nathan and Brian. Excited to be here to talk about Secretary’s Blinken – Secretary Blinken’s travel to attend the G20 Foreign Ministers meeting which will be held in Rio. As always, these meetings are an opportunity to work with the world’s largest economies on finding solutions to the challenges that are impacting all of our lives. We’re excited to be supporting Brazil on the ambitious agenda it has laid out for its presidency. During his meeting, Secretary Blinken will discuss our shared priorities, including on combating hunger, poverty – hunger and poverty, mobilizing against climate change, and reducing inequality. We will highlight how the U.S. leads the work of the United States; it is well-aligned with Brazil’s goals for its G20 presidency. Secretary Blinken plans to highlight several concrete examples such as our efforts to develop diverse climate-resistant crop varieties and build healthy soil through partnerships like the Vision for Adapted Crops and Soils. Secretary Blinken will discuss the multiple lines of effort that he and the U.S. Government are engaging in to de-escalate conflict in several regions. And we are also leading on strengthening international system so it’s more inclusive and effective at responding to modern challenges. We’re doing this through our support for UN Security Council reform, for evolving the multilateral development banks, and increasing the voice of emerging market economies in institutions like the G20 and at the IMF. Thanks to all of you for joining today. and looking forward to taking your questions. MR TEK: Great. Thank you so much. AT&T moderator, would you mind just haring the instructions for joining the question queue. OPERATOR: Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, press 1 than 0 on your telephone keypad. MR TEK: Great. Can we please go to the line of Jenny Hansler from CNN? QUESTION: Hi, can you hear me? MR TEK: Yes. QUESTION: Hi, thanks for doing this. Just a more logistical question, I guess. Does the Secretary intend to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov on the margins at the G20, as he did last year? And do you have any additional information about any other bilats he may be having on the margins there? And then on the meeting with Lula, given the divisions between the Brazilian leader and the U.S. on the conflict in Gaza, do you expect – how do you expect these conversations to go? Do you think you’ll be able to bridge any gaps there? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: So I’ll take the first one and then have Brian take the second one. This is Ramin Toloui. So we don’t have any meetings to preview at this time, any bilateral meetings. As a general matter, we’re going to underscore and continue to discuss the damage that the Kremlin’s war of aggression has caused and encourage all G20 partners to redouble their calls for a just, peaceful, and lasting end to the Kremlin’s war consistent with the UN Charter principles. We’ll continue to describe in clear terms what’s happening in Ukraine, explain our position which is shared by the vast majority of members at the UN General Assembly and at the G20. And let me turn it over to Brian for the second half of the question. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: So the Secretary is looking for a robust conversation and engagement with President Lula on a range of global issues. Brazil is a key partner on a whole host of issues, and among those the issues of global peace and security. I think it’s going to be a dynamic conversation. The Secretary will have recently engaged with partners both in Munich and his trips to the Middle East, and they’ll have an opportunity to discuss where we see opportunities to make progress in promoting greater stability and greater prosperity for the world. MR TEK: Great, thank you so much. Gentlemen, please go to the line of Simon Lewis from Reuters. QUESTION: Hi, thank you. I hope you can hear me. Yeah, I just wanted to follow up on Jenny’s question a little bit, the first question about Lavrov. I wonder if you could talk a little bit more about how the U.S. hopes the G20 will come together with a statement on Russia’s war in Ukraine. This has been a – obviously a sticking point in the last – like the last two hosts, I guess, of the G20. Are you looking for stronger language on the war in Ukraine or is there now – we’re now settled into a pattern of this – the language that’s been in, I guess, the last couple of statements out of it? And I’m wondering if the death of Alexei Navalny or the reported death of Alexei Navalny factored into that at all. Is that something that you would want G20 nations to come together to express a view on? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: Alex, so Brazil did not ask or attempt to mobilize a joint statement for the foreign ministers. And I should say that the foreign ministers meeting is not typically a venue for negotiating statements or issuing joint statements. MR TEK: Great. Thank you so much. Can we please go to the line of Shaun Tandon from the AFP? QUESTION: Hey there, thanks for this. Following up a little bit on my colleague’s question but on a different issue, Venezuela – in terms of the G20, but also bilaterally with Brazil and Argentina, these two leaders, Lula and Milei, seem to have quite (inaudible). To what extent do you expect Venezuela will factor into the discussions. And what are you looking for from the two leaders, considering the developments in Caracas? And just briefly, do you – could you say a little bit about what your agenda will be with Milei? I mean, he has – the economy is just front and center in terms of his – the beginning of his tenure. To what extent do you think the U.S. can work with him? How does the U.S. see him at this point? ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: Well, sort of – the opportunity to discuss with both countries efforts to promote democracy, rule of law, respect for human rights in our own hemisphere, will be crucial. President Lula is certain active in that front, and as a bordering country to Venezuela, has important ties and connections to the Maduro authorities and is able to deliver key messages to them. And the Brazilian Government has expressed its concerns about the situation there. And they played an important role in helping to address the tensions between the Maduro authorities and the Government of Guyana over the Esequibo, for example. President Milei has been very vocal in speaking out about the defense of democracy and human rights throughout our hemisphere, and particularly his concerns about the situation in Venezuela with regard to elections and democracy. There’s an important opportunity to talk to both leaders about those topics as well as other challenges to democracy and the rule of law around the world. With regard to Argentina, President Milei is engaged in a broad effort to reform the Argentine economy to deal with the overhang of massive debt that the country is suffering from and to make the government more efficient. Those will be important topics to discuss as well as how to accomplish those crucial goals while still safeguarding the most vulnerable in society. Argentina has tremendous potential, whether it’s in energy or in critical minerals, and talking about those trade opportunities between our two countries will be important. President Milei was also recently in Israel, and certainly Argentina has one of the largest Jewish populations in South America, I think the largest. And it’s an opportunity to get President Milei’s views on the way forward between Israel and Gaza. So we have a lot to talk about there. MR TEK: Thank you so much. Can we please go to the line of Aline Bronvati from – it looks like Broadcast São Paulo. QUESTION: Thanks for accepting my question. You mentioned the UN Security Council. Should Secretary Blinken discuss some type of support for Brazil with President Lula? And we have seen an escalation of public insecurity in Brazil. Is this topic the focus of the (inaudible) with President Lula considering the U.S. experience in dealing with an armed population? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: So it was a little bit difficult for me to understand; the line was a little bit garbled for me. But the question was with regard to security or crime concerns within Brazil? Was that the question? QUESTION: Yes, exactly. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: So the United States has a long history of cooperation with Brazil on law enforcement matters: cooperation through the State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, which continues in terms of information sharing, capacity building, and coordination; obviously coordination through the Department of Justice on legal issues and our law enforcement agencies. While those efforts will definitely continue, I think that’s – that’s not necessarily going to be the focus of the conversations, but that’s certainly something that we value and will continue to work on together. MR TEK: Thank you. Can we go to Nike Ching from Voice of America? QUESTION: Hello. Thank you very much for this call. I would like to ask about the Chinese influence in the Western Hemisphere. Brazil is a member of BRICS. Can you talk about – as the U.S. and China is in a competition relationship, can you talk about PRC’s influence there in the continent, and do you have anything – bilateral meetings between Secretary Blinken and Chinese counterparts? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: So I’ll just note that our view on issues like that is that what we want to do is make sure that countries are able to trade with whomever they think is valuable for them, but we want to make sure that countries understand what the value proposition is, what the costs and benefits are, and to make sure that the United States is offering up a comprehensive and powerful alternative to those who may not necessarily have others’ best interests at heart. And we want to make sure that we’re cooperating with Brazil on economic issues, not to mention the rest of this hemisphere. The United States is the largest source of foreign direct investment in Brazil and we have a robust presence of U.S. companies in Brazil, as well as in Argentina, and we’re looking forward to deepening our economic ties between both of them. And in terms of the scheduling and conversation of meetings, I’d defer that to Ramin. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: Yeah, as I said, we don’t have anything to preview in terms of the Secretary’s bilateral meetings at this time. I would just amplify what Brian said about the depth of the economic relationship between the United States and Brazil and the extraordinary potential to deepen that relationship in the years ahead. MR TEK: Fantastic. Can we please go to Andres Sivanza from The Politica Online? QUESTION: Thank you very much. I want to know what do you think about the dollarization that Milei plans to implement in Argentina, and also the possibility of a free trade agreement focused on critical minerals also with Argentina. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: Well, I think this one’s right down the middle between Ramin and I. I’ll just note that we don’t take a position on whether countries wish to use the dollar as their currency. That’s up to them. Some countries in our hemisphere do that. It’s a choice for each government and central bank to make depending on what they view as convenient. I don’t know, Ramin, do you have more on that? ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: No, Brian, I think you’ve articulated that well. MR TEK: Okay. Can we please go to Igor Patrick from the South China Morning Post? QUESTION: Hello. Thanks for doing this. I actually have two questions, one on Argentina and a second one on Brazil. So on Argentina, we know that Buenos Aires has been engaged in discussions for several months regarding the possibility of terminating negotiations with China for the purchase of JF-17 aircraft in favor of used F-16s from Denmark. I was just wondering if Secretary Blinken plans to address this topic during his discussion with Milei. And the second question – President Lula has been a prominent advocate for the concept of de-dollarization in foreign trade. He has even publicly called for the BRICS nations to conduct commercial transactions using their own currencies, and I was wondering if – what’s the official position of the U.S. State Department on this matter? And will it be part of Secretary Blinken’s agenda with Lula? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: So I can jump in on the second one, and I’ll invite Brian on the first one. So the Secretary of the Treasury is the only person in the U.S. Government who speaks on the dollar, so I won’t address that topic. I will just emphasize that the United States is – in all of our engagement with Brazil is looking for areas of cooperation and to deepen the economic relationship, and whether it’s in manufacturing or technology and many other areas, there’s enormous potential for deeper cooperation. MR TEK: A/S Nichols, anything to add on the other part of that question, or — ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: Yeah, sorry. The call dropped, so I didn’t – I think I missed several minutes of content. MR TEK: The question was about Argentina terminating negotiations with the PRC to purchase military aircraft from them. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: Ah. So yeah, I hadn’t even heard the question. So the – our view is that we want to be Argentina’s partner of choice. Argentina is a major non-NATO ally of the United States and we want to cooperate with them across a broad range of security issues, and we believe that the technology and the affordability of what we have on offer will meet Argentina’s needs. Beyond that, it’s up to them to choose who they purchase equipment from and who they choose as providers. MR TEK: Okay. And we have time for one more question, and that will go to Patricia Vasconcellos from SBT. QUESTION: Thank you very much. At the beginning, it was said that one of the goals of the trip is Secretary Blinken and President Lula discuss how to de-escalate tensions in different regions. How do you believe that this talk or meeting with President Lula can be beneficial to de-escalate tensions in Gaza? President Lula was recently in Cairo and spoke very openly about how he believes that this military operation there must be stopped in order to protect civilian lives. And a second question, if possible, related to workers’ right. If there is something that can be anticipated now and that goes beyond the agreement signed between Presidents Biden and Lula last year in New York regarding workers’ rights? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY NICHOLS: So first on the situation in Gaza, Secretary Blinken has been working tirelessly along with many allies and partners to try and find a way forward that would include a ceasefire and progress toward a two-state solution. We believe that Brazil, which has been vocal in trying to find a way forward to de-escalate this conflict and find longer-term solutions, is an important partner in this effort, and sharing ideas and views will be crucial to the conversation between Secretary Blinken, President Lula; Foreign Minister Vieira as well, I should note, is also someone who’s been very actively engaged on this. And with regard to labor issues, this is a tremendous priority for President Biden, Secretary Blinken, and the entire administration. This is an opportunity for us to talk about how do we ensure that workers around the world have the opportunity to better their lot, better their lives, to organize, to work transparently together. That’s an important part of the conversation that we have. And Ramin may have additional thoughts on that. ASSISTANT SECRETARY TOLOUI: Yes. The Biden administration released an ambitious strategy on global labor in November, and as the question suggested, this is also a critical area of agreement between Presidents Biden and Lula. And we at the State Department are implementing that strategy and the agreement between the two presidents. When I was in Brazil in December, I met with Brazilian labor leaders. When Secretary Blinken was in Davos in January, he met with a group of international labor leaders. So one distinctive dimension of this administration has been the increased engagement between the U.S. State Department and labor leaders as a matter of course in our foreign policy. MR TEK: Thank you so much. That does conclude our call. Thank you all so much for joining us, and thank you to our speakers. The embargo on the call is now lifted. As a reminder, this call was on the record. Thank you so much for joining us and have a great day. Goodbye. |
| On Senegal’s Constitutional Court Decision |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 06:08 PM EST On Senegal’s Constitutional Court DecisionPress Statement February 16, 2024 The United States welcomes the February 15 decision by Senegal’s Constitutional Council to restore the presidential electoral calendar in accordance with Senegal’s constitution. We note President Sall’s announcement that he will fully implement the Constitutional Council’s decision and take the necessary steps to organize the election as quickly as possible. We urge all stakeholders to come together in the spirit of Senegal’s strong democratic tradition to support a free and fair election conducted in a peaceful and timely manner. The United States stands with the Senegalese people in their unwavering support for democracy. |
| U.S. Delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Meeting on a Pandemic Accord |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 06:19 PM EST U.S. Delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Meeting on a Pandemic AccordMedia Note February 16, 2024 On February 19, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, U.S. Chief Negotiator for the Pandemic Accord, will lead an interagency U.S. delegation to the World Health Organization Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) in Geneva, Switzerland for the eighth round of negotiations on an international instrument to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The delegation includes representatives from the Department of State, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to work together to find solutions to improve global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Infectious diseases do not respect national borders, and the best way to prevent the next pandemic is to improve both domestic and global capabilities. U.S. leadership in these negotiations will help ensure that we reduce the risk of outbreaks — the vast majority of which arise outside the United States — affecting American lives and livelihoods. The United States is the world’s leading global health and pandemic preparedness funder. Since 2021, the United States has committed nearly $48 billion to global health efforts, including nearly $16 billion globally to end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, by supporting critical response interventions and providing hundreds of millions of vaccine doses to more than 100 countries, alongside therapeutics, oxygen, and other medical supplies. U.S. goals for these negotiations are:
Collectively, these actions will make the United States, and the world, safer. The United States is committed to working with all WHO Member States to develop a new international instrument that meets these goals and will advance global health security for all people. For media inquiries, please contact GHSD_publicaffairs@ |
| U.S. Delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Meeting on a Pandemic Accord |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 06:19 PM EST U.S. Delegation to the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) Meeting on a Pandemic AccordMedia Note February 16, 2024 On February 19, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, U.S. Chief Negotiator for the Pandemic Accord, will lead an interagency U.S. delegation to the World Health Organization Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) in Geneva, Switzerland for the eighth round of negotiations on an international instrument to strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The delegation includes representatives from the Department of State, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical to work together to find solutions to improve global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Infectious diseases do not respect national borders, and the best way to prevent the next pandemic is to improve both domestic and global capabilities. U.S. leadership in these negotiations will help ensure that we reduce the risk of outbreaks — the vast majority of which arise outside the United States — affecting American lives and livelihoods. The United States is the world’s leading global health and pandemic preparedness funder. Since 2021, the United States has committed nearly $48 billion to global health efforts, including nearly $16 billion globally to end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, by supporting critical response interventions and providing hundreds of millions of vaccine doses to more than 100 countries, alongside therapeutics, oxygen, and other medical supplies. U.S. goals for these negotiations are:
Collectively, these actions will make the United States, and the world, safer. The United States is committed to working with all WHO Member States to develop a new international instrument that meets these goals and will advance global health security for all people. For media inquiries, please contact GHSD_publicaffairs@ |
| Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Jamaica and Belize |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 06:26 PM EST Under Secretary Zeya’s Travel to Jamaica and BelizeMedia Note February 16, 2024 Under Secretary of State for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights Uzra Zeya will travel to Kingston, Jamaica, and Belmopan, Belize from February 19-23, 2024, to advance bilateral and regional cooperation on civilian security, migration, and human rights. In Kingston, Under Secretary Zeya will underscore the strength of the U.S.-Jamaica partnership and meet with senior government officials to enhance our cooperation in civilian security and law enforcement, human rights, and rule of law. She will meet with close partners to engage on the Haiti Multinational Security Support mission. Additionally, the Under Secretary will commemorate the opening of a Child Friendly Space developed through the U.S.-Jamaica Child Protection Compact Partnership, which provides safety and support to children who are victims or witnesses of crime. She will explore with educators and youth opportunities to strengthen the capacity of families and communities to prevent youth violence. In Belmopan, Under Secretary Zeya will engage senior government officials, civil society, and human rights advocates on bilateral and regional security, as well as our efforts to strengthen safe, orderly, and humane migration management, address human trafficking, counter discrimination, and protect fundamental freedoms of vulnerable groups. For further information, please follow @UnderSecStateJ. |
| Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 07:52 PM EST Deputy Secretary Campbell’s Call with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister OkanoReadout February 16, 2024 The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell spoke with Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Okano Masataka. Deputy Secretary Campbell and Vice Minister Okano reaffirmed the vital importance of the U.S.-Japan Alliance as well as the U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea trilateral relationship to peace, security, and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific, and underscored their commitment to further strengthen and deepen those ties. The Deputy Secretary and Vice Minister committed to close cooperation on addressing the most serious regional and global challenges, including through further strengthening the Alliance. Deputy Secretary Campbell emphasized that President Biden looks forward to welcoming Prime Minister Kishida to Washington in April. |
| Lithuania National Day |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:13 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the United States of America, I extend heartfelt congratulations to the people of Lithuania as you celebrate your independence. As President Biden said in his July 12 speech at Vilnius University, “Lithuania stands today as a stronghold of liberty and opportunity, a proud member of the European Union and NATO.” This year, you will celebrate the 20th anniversary of your membership in both organizations, marking your important participation in the community of democracies. Lithuania’s rich history and unwavering commitment to democracy serve as an inspiration to us all. As we celebrate Lithuania’s independence, we remember the values that bind our nations together — a dedication to freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. The United States takes pride in our enduring friendship and Alliance with Lithuania. Together, we have faced challenges and celebrated triumphs, fostering a partnership rooted in shared principles. We remain firm in our joint commitments to ensure the strength of NATO, to support Ukraine in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression, and to stand with those fighting against autocracy. Congratulations once again, I extend my warmest wishes for health, prosperity, and security to all Lithuanians. |
| Lithuania National Day |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:13 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the United States of America, I extend heartfelt congratulations to the people of Lithuania as you celebrate your independence. As President Biden said in his July 12 speech at Vilnius University, “Lithuania stands today as a stronghold of liberty and opportunity, a proud member of the European Union and NATO.” This year, you will celebrate the 20th anniversary of your membership in both organizations, marking your important participation in the community of democracies. Lithuania’s rich history and unwavering commitment to democracy serve as an inspiration to us all. As we celebrate Lithuania’s independence, we remember the values that bind our nations together — a dedication to freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. The United States takes pride in our enduring friendship and Alliance with Lithuania. Together, we have faced challenges and celebrated triumphs, fostering a partnership rooted in shared principles. We remain firm in our joint commitments to ensure the strength of NATO, to support Ukraine in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression, and to stand with those fighting against autocracy. Congratulations once again, I extend my warmest wishes for health, prosperity, and security to all Lithuanians. |
| Lithuania National Day |
| 02/16/2024 |
02/16/2024 09:13 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State On behalf of the United States of America, I extend heartfelt congratulations to the people of Lithuania as you celebrate your independence. As President Biden said in his July 12 speech at Vilnius University, “Lithuania stands today as a stronghold of liberty and opportunity, a proud member of the European Union and NATO.” This year, you will celebrate the 20th anniversary of your membership in both organizations, marking your important participation in the community of democracies. Lithuania’s rich history and unwavering commitment to democracy serve as an inspiration to us all. As we celebrate Lithuania’s independence, we remember the values that bind our nations together — a dedication to freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. The United States takes pride in our enduring friendship and Alliance with Lithuania. Together, we have faced challenges and celebrated triumphs, fostering a partnership rooted in shared principles. We remain firm in our joint commitments to ensure the strength of NATO, to support Ukraine in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression, and to stand with those fighting against autocracy. Congratulations once again, I extend my warmest wishes for health, prosperity, and security to all Lithuanians. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Séjourné |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:18 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Stéphane Séjourné on the margins of the Munich Security Conference to discuss shared global interests. The Secretary and Foreign Minister Séjourné discussed the importance of preventing the conflict in Gaza from spreading, including avoiding escalation in Lebanon, and the need to deter illegal attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis. They also discussed steadfast support for Ukraine as it continues to defend against Russia’s brutal aggression. In addition, Secretary Blinken and Minister Séjourné discussed the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington and our crucial relationship as NATO Allies. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:12 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba today on the margins of the Munich Security Conference in Germany. The two discussed ongoing efforts to support Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression and Ukraine’s critical air defense needs as Russia continues its aerial attacks against economic hubs and civilian infrastructure. The Secretary emphasized U.S. commitment to Ukraine’s recovery efforts and support for Ukraine’s future in Euro-Atlantic institutions. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:08 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to discuss strengthening bilateral ties and U.S. support for efforts to reach a durable and dignified peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Secretary Blinken noted our ongoing efforts to support Armenia’s vision for a prosperous and democratic future for its people, as well as U.S. support for Armenia’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:08 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to discuss strengthening bilateral ties and U.S. support for efforts to reach a durable and dignified peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Secretary Blinken noted our ongoing efforts to support Armenia’s vision for a prosperous and democratic future for its people, as well as U.S. support for Armenia’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity. |
| DPRK: Ten Years After the UN Commission of Inquiry Final Report |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:24 AM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson Today marks the 10th anniversary of the release of the final report of the UN Commission of Inquiry on the human rights situation in the DPRK. The groundbreaking report provided compelling evidence of widespread, systematic, and grave human rights violations by the DPRK government, and reflected the international community’s consensus view that the human rights situation in the DPRK was among the worst in the world. A decade later, reports indicate that the situation in the DPRK has only worsened. Kim Jong Un continues to exploit his citizens including through mass mobilizations and the monopolization of food distribution, in support of the DPRK’s unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs. We call on the DPRK to initiate a reform process to implement the recommendations of the 2014 UN Commission of Inquiry and to respect human rights. We also urge the international community to take immediate action to address the egregious human rights situation in the DPRK and for Member States to respect the principle of nonrefoulement. Promoting respect for human rights and human dignity in the DPRK remains a top priority for the U.S. government. We remain committed to shining a spotlight on human rights abuses and violations, promoting accountability for those responsible for them, and increasing access to independent information inside the DPRK. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Séjourné |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:18 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Stéphane Séjourné on the margins of the Munich Security Conference to discuss shared global interests. The Secretary and Foreign Minister Séjourné discussed the importance of preventing the conflict in Gaza from spreading, including avoiding escalation in Lebanon, and the need to deter illegal attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis. They also discussed steadfast support for Ukraine as it continues to defend against Russia’s brutal aggression. In addition, Secretary Blinken and Minister Séjourné discussed the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington and our crucial relationship as NATO Allies. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 08:12 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba today on the margins of the Munich Security Conference in Germany. The two discussed ongoing efforts to support Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression and Ukraine’s critical air defense needs as Russia continues its aerial attacks against economic hubs and civilian infrastructure. The Secretary emphasized U.S. commitment to Ukraine’s recovery efforts and support for Ukraine’s future in Euro-Atlantic institutions. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:16 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, Mr. President. I very much appreciate this opportunity to spend time with President Aliyev. We’ve had many opportunities over the last few years to speak and to meet. I think this is an important time – important in Azerbaijan taking on the leadership of COP, something we strongly support and we look forward to doing everything we can to make that successful; but also in pursuing a durable and dignified peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, an area where the United States has worked to be helpful and will continue to do so, as requested. There’s lots to talk about. Mr. President, thank you so much for spending the time today. PRESIDENT ALIYEV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. And as the Secretary mentioned, the COP29 is an important part of our bilateral agenda, or it expands, actually, topics on our agenda, and we count on the support from your government in all our initiatives during this year. And as Mr. Secretary mentioned, we have also one issue on our agenda, which is the regional situation in the Caucasus, particularly prospects for a peace settlement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is committed to peace, and reaching a peace agreement as soon as possible is in our national interest. I’m very grateful to the United States, and personally to the Secretary for his efforts in this direction. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:16 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, Mr. President. I very much appreciate this opportunity to spend time with President Aliyev. We’ve had many opportunities over the last few years to speak and to meet. I think this is an important time – important in Azerbaijan taking on the leadership of COP, something we strongly support and we look forward to doing everything we can to make that successful; but also in pursuing a durable and dignified peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, an area where the United States has worked to be helpful and will continue to do so, as requested. There’s lots to talk about. Mr. President, thank you so much for spending the time today. PRESIDENT ALIYEV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. And as the Secretary mentioned, the COP29 is an important part of our bilateral agenda, or it expands, actually, topics on our agenda, and we count on the support from your government in all our initiatives during this year. And as Mr. Secretary mentioned, we have also one issue on our agenda, which is the regional situation in the Caucasus, particularly prospects for a peace settlement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is committed to peace, and reaching a peace agreement as soon as possible is in our national interest. I’m very grateful to the United States, and personally to the Secretary for his efforts in this direction. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Israeli President Isaac Herzog Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:23 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone. It’s a great pleasure to once again be with President Herzog. We admire and rely on his leadership, his wisdom, and his vision. We’re thinking, of course, of the hostages and doing everything possible to bring them home. We’re thinking, as we always do, about Israel’s security both today but also for every day, for the long term. We’re thinking of the suffering of people caught up in the middle of conflict, including the Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. We’re thinking as well of the genuine opportunities that lie before us for a better, more secure future for Israelis, Palestinians, and all of our friends in the region. There’s a lot of work to be done to move toward that future, but I’m grateful for President Herzog and our work to not only think about it, but to help realize it. Thank you. Mr. President. PRESIDENT HERZOG: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. It’s always great to meet you and see you. We thank President Biden for his steadfast support of the state of Israel, for the administration and yourself, in these dire moments. We are here with a group of family members of the hostages, including people who were – who came back from captivity in Gaza. And their plight is at our top priority. We want them back and we’re working with the international community. We are working with you and the international community on the issue of the humanitarian supply, making sure to upgrade it according to the rules of international humanitarian law whenever and wherever is necessary. The most important issue, of course, is that if you look at the horizon – I heard your remarks today, and I think that I find them very interesting. I think there are opportunities; they need to be studied in depth. However, first and foremost, Israel’s security must be preserved, and for this we have to complete the work of undermining and eradicating the basic infrastructure of Hamas. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Israeli President Isaac Herzog Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:23 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone. It’s a great pleasure to once again be with President Herzog. We admire and rely on his leadership, his wisdom, and his vision. We’re thinking, of course, of the hostages and doing everything possible to bring them home. We’re thinking, as we always do, about Israel’s security both today but also for every day, for the long term. We’re thinking of the suffering of people caught up in the middle of conflict, including the Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. We’re thinking as well of the genuine opportunities that lie before us for a better, more secure future for Israelis, Palestinians, and all of our friends in the region. There’s a lot of work to be done to move toward that future, but I’m grateful for President Herzog and our work to not only think about it, but to help realize it. Thank you. Mr. President. PRESIDENT HERZOG: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. It’s always great to meet you and see you. We thank President Biden for his steadfast support of the state of Israel, for the administration and yourself, in these dire moments. We are here with a group of family members of the hostages, including people who were – who came back from captivity in Gaza. And their plight is at our top priority. We want them back and we’re working with the international community. We are working with you and the international community on the issue of the humanitarian supply, making sure to upgrade it according to the rules of international humanitarian law whenever and wherever is necessary. The most important issue, of course, is that if you look at the horizon – I heard your remarks today, and I think that I find them very interesting. I think there are opportunities; they need to be studied in depth. However, first and foremost, Israel’s security must be preserved, and for this we have to complete the work of undermining and eradicating the basic infrastructure of Hamas. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:16 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone, Mr. President. I very much appreciate this opportunity to spend time with President Aliyev. We’ve had many opportunities over the last few years to speak and to meet. I think this is an important time – important in Azerbaijan taking on the leadership of COP, something we strongly support and we look forward to doing everything we can to make that successful; but also in pursuing a durable and dignified peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, an area where the United States has worked to be helpful and will continue to do so, as requested. There’s lots to talk about. Mr. President, thank you so much for spending the time today. PRESIDENT ALIYEV: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. And as the Secretary mentioned, the COP29 is an important part of our bilateral agenda, or it expands, actually, topics on our agenda, and we count on the support from your government in all our initiatives during this year. And as Mr. Secretary mentioned, we have also one issue on our agenda, which is the regional situation in the Caucasus, particularly prospects for a peace settlement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is committed to peace, and reaching a peace agreement as soon as possible is in our national interest. I’m very grateful to the United States, and personally to the Secretary for his efforts in this direction. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thanks, everyone. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Israeli President Isaac Herzog Before Their Meeting |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:23 AM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, good afternoon, everyone. It’s a great pleasure to once again be with President Herzog. We admire and rely on his leadership, his wisdom, and his vision. We’re thinking, of course, of the hostages and doing everything possible to bring them home. We’re thinking, as we always do, about Israel’s security both today but also for every day, for the long term. We’re thinking of the suffering of people caught up in the middle of conflict, including the Palestinian men, women, and children in Gaza. We’re thinking as well of the genuine opportunities that lie before us for a better, more secure future for Israelis, Palestinians, and all of our friends in the region. There’s a lot of work to be done to move toward that future, but I’m grateful for President Herzog and our work to not only think about it, but to help realize it. Thank you. Mr. President. PRESIDENT HERZOG: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary. It’s always great to meet you and see you. We thank President Biden for his steadfast support of the state of Israel, for the administration and yourself, in these dire moments. We are here with a group of family members of the hostages, including people who were – who came back from captivity in Gaza. And their plight is at our top priority. We want them back and we’re working with the international community. We are working with you and the international community on the issue of the humanitarian supply, making sure to upgrade it according to the rules of international humanitarian law whenever and wherever is necessary. The most important issue, of course, is that if you look at the horizon – I heard your remarks today, and I think that I find them very interesting. I think there are opportunities; they need to be studied in depth. However, first and foremost, Israel’s security must be preserved, and for this we have to complete the work of undermining and eradicating the basic infrastructure of Hamas. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Thank you, everyone. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Azerbaijani President Aliyev |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:45 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met today with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev. The Secretary emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Azerbaijan bilateral relationship and highlighted the United States’ support for a successful COP29 in Baku in November. Secretary Blinken and President Aliyev discussed efforts to achieve a durable peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Secretary reiterated U.S. support for a successful conclusion of those efforts, building on previous negotiations. The Secretary raised the importance of Azerbaijan adhering to its international commitments and obligations regarding human rights. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Azerbaijani President Aliyev |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 09:45 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met today with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev. The Secretary emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Azerbaijan bilateral relationship and highlighted the United States’ support for a successful COP29 in Baku in November. Secretary Blinken and President Aliyev discussed efforts to achieve a durable peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Secretary reiterated U.S. support for a successful conclusion of those efforts, building on previous negotiations. The Secretary raised the importance of Azerbaijan adhering to its international commitments and obligations regarding human rights. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Meeting with Israeli President Herzog |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 10:46 AM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken met with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Munich. The Secretary reaffirmed Israel’s right to ensure the terrorist attacks of October 7 can never be repeated. Secretary Blinken and President Herzog discussed ongoing efforts to secure the release of hostages and achieve a humanitarian pause that would help enable the increased flow of humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Secretary Blinken reiterated that the United States could not support a military ground operation in Rafah without a credible and implementable plan for ensuring the safety of the more than one million people sheltering there. Secretary Blinken emphasized the need for all parties to take feasible measures to protect civilian lives and prevent the conflict from expanding. The Secretary underscored the U.S. commitment to lasting peace in the region, including through the establishment of a Palestinian state with security guaranteed for Israel. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Calls with Northern Ireland First Minister O’Neill, deputy First Minister Little-Pengelly, and Democratic Unionist Party leader Donaldson |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 03:27 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O’Neill, deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, and Democratic Unionist Party leader Jeffrey Donaldson. The Secretary congratulated the First Minister and deputy First Minister on their appointments and welcomed the restoration of the power-sharing government at Stormont. The Secretary encouraged the leaders to work collaboratively to deliver prosperity for the people of Northern Ireland and to model cooperative power-sharing for the world to see. The Secretary affirmed the U.S. commitment to Northern Ireland’s future and to preserving the gains of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement for all. |
| Secretary Blinken’s Calls with Northern Ireland First Minister O’Neill, deputy First Minister Little-Pengelly, and Democratic Unionist Party leader Donaldson |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 03:27 PM EST Office of the Spokesperson The below is attributable to Spokesperson Matthew Miller: Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O’Neill, deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, and Democratic Unionist Party leader Jeffrey Donaldson. The Secretary congratulated the First Minister and deputy First Minister on their appointments and welcomed the restoration of the power-sharing government at Stormont. The Secretary encouraged the leaders to work collaboratively to deliver prosperity for the people of Northern Ireland and to model cooperative power-sharing for the world to see. The Secretary affirmed the U.S. commitment to Northern Ireland’s future and to preserving the gains of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement for all. |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar At the Munich Security Conference |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 03:49 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof MODERATOR: (In progress) for Germany. Welcome. (Applause.) Antony Blinken, Secretary of State of the U.S. (Applause.) Nice to have you. And Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs, Republic of India. Minister. (Applause.) I hope that based on the topic of the session that you will not all agree with each other and we can have some sparks. We have about 43 minutes, and I will prepare your questions because I’ll ask a few questions and then I’ll turn to the audience. Minister Baerbock, I’m going to start with you. Germany’s national security strategy calls for expanding global partnerships and is quite open about the multipolarity of the world today. How do you go about it at a time when there are so many divisions, and particularly when increasingly we feel the Global South and the Western world are not on the same page? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, first of all, good afternoon. Very good to have this important session with my dear colleagues. In a nutshell, it’s more important than ever. Because we are not naïve: Obviously, there are ruthless actors who don’t want to – to drub up the title of our panel – negotiate the slice of the pie, but they want to rob the whole bakery. And having that in mind, I believe it’s even more important than ever that those who are at the table negotiating about the slices of the pie stay there, first of all, resolute, respectfully, and also reflective. And this is the core also of our national security strategy, which we have drafted as the German government, making very clear in the light of this ruthless war of aggression against Ukraine that we are resolute in defending international law. It’s the best protection for everybody around the world. So there is no question about negotiating whether Ukraine has right of self-defense or not. We all agreed not only – I don’t like that word, but “Western” actors – we all agreed in our Charter of the United Nations there is the right of self-defense, and we all agreed on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Having said that, obviously we have to be respectful that especially within Ukraine – and I think this is the lesson we have learned, and it was very important to speak to partners like India and so many around the world – Brazil, South Africa – we have to be respectful that obviously, in this moment when we said we need the whole international security, others asked some questions, like: Where have you been when we needed you? Or asked some question, so actually what does it mean for the future? Do you also stand with us? And this is, I would say, maybe something you in the attitude – at least from our foreign politics from Europe to say, okay, we cannot take for granted that everybody just agrees with our European or transatlantic vision. And the third part, I think it’s the most easy, but it’s the strongest asset for democracies. The strength of democracy, in my point of view, is that we can be self-reflective and self-critical. So asking in a moment when others – for example, war of aggression – were not saying automatically, okay, we support you, not saying why don’t you get it, but asking ourself why they cannot support us. And I think this is the critical part but the most powerful part, and at least, again, in our national security strategy we try to do it, talking about, for example, our colonialism past. Understanding why South Africa was mentioning the whole time their ties with Russia in the Apartheid regime. And being self-critical and saying, oh, yeah, not all democracies have stood back in time at their side, and taking that as something where we said, yes, we might have made a mistake in the past, but we cannot change the past; we can only change the future together. I think this is the strength of multilateralism, and we see around the world the majority believes in it. MODERATOR: Do you find that increasingly people are questioning more when it comes to – let’s stick to Ukraine and we’ll get to Gaza in a minute. But on Ukraine, are people coming around to your point of view or are they distancing themselves more? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, to see it over the least three years, I mean, we have seen the 142 voting in the General Assembly, so it is a majority of states. Because most of the countries in the world, like mine – we’re not the biggest country in the world; we don’t have the biggest military means. And this is for most of the countries: They know that the Charter of the United Nations, the rule of law is their life insurance. So we see this big majority there when you see also the support. Many have traveled – and I think this is really important to give always the question of war of aggression a human face. It was not that we convinced some other actors in the world by saying now you have to stand with that, but when a delegation traveled to Kyiv – and not only Kyiv, to Bucha, to Irpin – when they spoke, like we did, to the parents of those where their child had been kidnapped by Russia, then we give this ideation a human face, and that’s all about. And this is why it’s so important to not only talk about state, but we talk about the people, talk about also the question of the rule of law in front of the International Criminal Court, for example, bringing crimes against humanity in front of the court. And there we see again the majority of the states is pushing for that one. MODERATOR: Secretary Blinken, there is a – there is a feeling that – it’s more than a feeling, it’s what we see on – happening on the ground, that the U.S.-China tensions are leading to greater fragmentation and that you’re almost competing for alliances: who’s our ally? And we see this within the UN, in various UN institutions, but we just see it all around the globe. To what extent do you feel that you are challenged in your travels around the world on the fundamental questions? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, it’s wonderful to be with my friends, wonderful to be back in Munich at the Security Conference, known among all of us as speed dating for diplomats. (Laughter.) But we’ve done a couple of things, and I’ll come quickly to your question. From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that. When it comes to strategic competition – and there’s no doubt that we have one with China – there are a few things to be said. First, we have an obligation to manage that relationship responsibly, and I think that’s something that we hear from countries around the world, and it’s clearly in our interest to do so, and that’s exactly what President Biden is doing. And when it comes to other countries, the point is not to say to country X, Y, or Z, “You have to choose;” the point is to offer a good choice. And if we can do that – and I believe we can and we have and will continue – then I think the choice becomes fairly self-evident. Over the last six or seven months, we have engaged in a sustainable way with China. I just met my counterpart Wang Yi here in Munich, but that follows a series of meetings, notably and most importantly President Biden and President Xi, and I think we’ve brought greater stability to the relationship, not moving away from or ignoring the fact that, yes, we have a competition, there are areas where we are contesting each other, but there are also areas where we can and should cooperate because it’s in our interest to do that. One of the best examples of that is the agreement reached with China on fentanyl. The single largest – the number one killer, number one killer of Americans aged 18 to 49 is the synthetic opioid, fentanyl. Now we have meaningful cooperation from and with China on fentanyl. That’s going to make a difference in the lives of Americans. MODERATOR: And do you think it is sustainable to have cooperation on – in some areas, climate being one of them, but to have a strategic competition – the strategic competition that defines geopolitics today and that will go on for a very long time? Do you think that that is sustainable that both sides sort of can find rules of engagement? This is where we compete and this is where we cooperate? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Some fundamentals haven’t changed. Countries will act in their self-interest. Where we have to compete, we will. Where we have to contest, we will. Where it makes sense to cooperate, we will. And I think you can do all of the above at the same time. But there’s something else that’s, I think, changed, and it goes back to the first part of the question. The very fact that we’ve re-engaged and rejuvenated as well as reimagined some of our alliances and partnerships, along with the investments that we’ve made at home in the United States – the investments we’ve made in our infrastructure, the investments we’ve made in science and technology and chips, the building blocks of the 21st century economy, the investments we’ve made in climate technology – you put those two things together: investments at home, much greater alignment with partners and allies across the board in Europe, in the Indo-Pacific, in Asia on how to approach a question as complicated as relations with China – that puts us in a position of much greater strength in dealing with all of the challenges that we have to deal with. MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, India has more of a multiple-choice mindset. Is – would that be – would that be right? From nonalignment to – I think you may have called it or somebody else called it “all-alignment.” So you can pick and choose alliances, but you can also pick and choose topics. On Russia, for example, you still buy Russian oil. Is that okay with your counterpart from the U.S.? Everything is – your relationship is fine? You can do whatever you want whenever you want? (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Okay. First of all — MODERATOR: I mean, you’re sitting next to each other, so — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: No, no. First of all, delighted to be here, and I couldn’t find a better set of people to be with on the stage. So thank you for whoever put us on together. Your question: Do we have multiple options? The answer is yes. Is that a problem? Why should it be a problem? If I’m smart enough to have multiple options, you should be admiring me, you shouldn’t be criticizing me. (Laughter and applause.) Now, is that a problem for other people? I don’t think so. I don’t think so, certainly in this case and in that case. Because, look, we try to explain what are the different pulls and pressures which countries have. And it’s very hard to have a unidimensional relationship. Now, again, different countries and different relationships have different histories. If I were to look, say, between the U.S. and Germany, it is rooted – there’s an alliance nature to it; there’s a certain history on which that relationship is grounded. In our case it’s very different. So I don’t want you to even inadvertently give the impression that we are purely and unsentimentally transactional. We are not. We get along with people. We believe in things, we share things, we agree on some things. But there are times when you’re located in different places, have different levels of development, different experiences – all of that gets into it. So life is complicated. Life is differentiated. And I think it’s very important today not to reduce the entire complexity of our world into very sweeping propositions. I think that era is today behind us. So I agree very much with what Tony said, which is good partners provide choices. Smart partners take some of those choices. But sometimes there will be choices on which you say, well, I think I’ll pass up on that one. MODERATOR: It’s a very good point, which brings me to the BRICS and the rise of middle powers, because that is one of the shifts that we see today. To what extent do you think that that is a challenge to the West, or maybe that can be sort of the bridge, especially in a world where we will see continued competition between the U.S. and China? And I’m going to ask Minister Jaishankar first and – but I’d love for both of you to comment as well. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Yeah, I thought maybe the BRICS one you wanted the U.S. to — SECRETARY BLINKEN: After you, Jai, please. (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: But look, again, I think it’s important to go back to how it began. The BRICS started in an era where Western dominance was very strong. The premier gathering of the world was the G7, and you had a number of significant powers in the world who felt that, well, they were not part of the G7 but maybe they also brought value to the table by sitting and discussing with others. So in a sense you had a collection of these countries. It was originally four; South Africa joined later. And if you look at it, it’s a very interesting group because it’s geographically as disparate as it can be. Yet it is bound by the fact that these discussions we’ve had over a decade and a half have been very useful for all of us. Now, like any product, you test it in the market at some point. We tested it last year and asked people, so how many of you want to join BRICS? And we got almost 30 countries who were willing to join BRICS. So clearly, if 30 countries saw value in it, there must be something good we have done. So I think it’s important today to make a distinction between being non-West and anti-West. I would certainly characterize India as a country which is non-West, but which has an extremely strong relationship with Western countries getting better by the day. Not everybody else necessarily in that grouping might qualify for that description. But the contribution the BRICS has made – if one looks at the G7 and how it evolved into the G20, I think in a way those additional 13 members who came into this bigger grouping, five of them are BRICS members. The fact that there was another group which was meeting regularly and discussing and debating I think certainly was an input into the expansion of the G7 into the G20. So I think we did a service to the world. MODERATOR: Yeah. Secretary Blinken? SECRETARY BLINKEN: I’m tempted to say what my friend said and leave it at that. Look, the – what we don’t need to do and what we’re not doing is trying to somehow design the world into rigid blocks. Each and every one of the issues that we have to deal with, and deal with in the interests of the American people, may have different collections and coalitions of countries that are focused on it, that bring certain experiences, certain capacities, and I think about it as variable geometry. We’re putting together a puzzle with collections of countries, and not just countries, organizations of different sizes and different shapes to deal with a given problem. As Jai said, we have – and of course the fact that the relationship between our countries, I would argue, is the strongest it’s ever been, it makes no difference that India happens to be a leading member of BRICS. We’re a leading member of the G7. We have the G20 and we have a multiplicity of things that we’re doing together every single day in different ways of organizing ourselves. India and the United States working together in AUKUS, working together – I mean, excuse me, in the Quad, working together in a variety of other fora. All of this goes to the point that the complexity and the multiplicity of the challenges that we have demands that we find different ways to work together, and this shouldn’t be done on an exclusive basis. Look, our default, of course, is to work in the first instance with fellow democracies. That’s only normal and natural. But we are not only willing, we are actively working with any country that wants to solve a particular problem and wants to do so within the context of a rules-based order. That’s the way we approach things. MODERATOR: Speaking of a rule-based order, major powers today are criticized for sort of upholding the rule-based order and upholding values in certain areas but not in others, and a lot of people around the world – and particularly in the Global South but I would say not only in the Global South; even within our Western democracies – are confused. They look at what’s happening in Gaza and at the intensity of the killing, and they ask: Where are human rights? Where are these Western values? I’m sure you’re having here today and yesterday a lot of similar discussions, Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Yes, and they are so productive because many of them are not only speed dating, but behind closed doors, very trustfully. And I think the most important job for those who believe in a rules-based international order, be it politicians, be it journalists, be it citizens, is to not be pushed into this speed dating, into this black-and-white world in all of our bubbles. Because easily – and this is a double-standard question, yeah – if you only look – and you mentioned the situation in Gaza. If I only see the whole time on YouTube what’s happening in Gaza, and I do that every second day – every day I cannot stand it because otherwise I couldn’t get out of my bed anymore – yeah, your reality is obviously – the only thing what we can and have to do right now is to go in a total ceasefire to rescue these innocent children dying there every day. Yeah? So, and you’re 100 percent right by that. But the question is to really come to this reality is to force myself – not myself, but all these persons who are saying this is the moral right thing to do – to then also ask: So how do we come to that? And this is then when some might ask: So why you, German foreign minister, didn’t call for immediate ceasefire the last – months ago? Because I also looked at the other side, at the other YouTube videos, at the other bubbles, yeah, where we saw, I saw for days after the 7th of October – I didn’t only see it, I spoke to the father whose wife and two little girls had been kidnapped by terrorists from Hamas. I saw the video where women have been not only raped, but murdered afterwards. And in that moment for me it was clear, again, that we can also not only relate to the past saying, okay, we know how negotiations about – with terrorists are working. Because if you saw that video and if you were ready to see this woman suffering there, you understand that this is not only a military logic. Because those people who are doing this, raping a woman and killing her afterwards, they don’t want to exchange soldiers for political prisoners. They enjoy slaughtering women. I’m saying that because I think this is really important, bringing it down to the people. Because then you understand in this kind of situation, how do we come now to a ceasefire? That the release of hostages, the release of these women is crucial because otherwise we can never save the children in Gaza. So this comes all back to what my dear colleague Jaishankar has said. If we are not capable of stepping out of right or wrong, yes or no, black or white, we will in this world of dilemmas never do what our job – I would say the three of us here – is: to do all the best to rescue people. And this is why we have been working so intensively for those partners, Arab partners, in the last three months to see how we can come together for the most important point right now: freeing the hostages, having a humanitarian pause to bring in humanitarian support into Gaza, and not stopping even though the headlines are there every day: You cannot fix it anyhow. I think the biggest favor for those who do not care for human rights and the international order is that we are giving up and that we are not being ready to look at these different topics from our different side. And this is why – at least for me; I would say for all the three of us – use our competences, use our channels we are having. And there again diversity is beneficial. If we are not all the same, but if we are trying to solve this horrible war in the Middle East from our different perspectives, then we can also bring security both for the people in Israel and the people in Gaza. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I have to say I fully subscribe – (applause) – fully subscribe to everything that Annalena said. And I think as people in positions, for a brief period of time, of responsibility, but also, and maybe foremost, as human beings – as mothers, fathers, children, brothers, and sisters – we’re intensely driven to try to prevent or stop human suffering, including the suffering of men, women, and children in Gaza. The question is how to do it most effectively and how to take account of the incredible complexity that Annalena just outlined so well. But there’s another element to this that we have a responsibility to do something about. The greatest poison in our common well is dehumanization. And we see that in all directions. And if you lose sight of the humanity of someone else, then your heart is hardened to a point where anything is acceptable and anything is possible. Part of our responsibility is to do what we can to push back, to avoid, to call out dehumanization wherever it’s coming from, in whatever direction. Because if we can’t get at that, it’s very hard, if not impossible, to do other things. MODERATOR: One other criticism that I think I’m sure you hear a lot is U.S. policy has, of course, shifted in the last couple of months, but yet you want the fighting to stop, but there is no sign whatsoever that you’re not willing to send weapons to Israel, for example. So that also confuses people. When they look at the rhetoric versus the action, what would you say to that? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, we’re committed to Israel’s security. That’s been clear from day one. It remains clear. And we understand and support the proposition that Israel has to find ways to make sure that what happened on October 7th never happens again. (Applause.) So we start there. But we’ve also said – and not only said, we’ve acted on the proposition – that, of course, the way Israel does that matters profoundly. The way it does it in terms of trying to ensure greater protection for civilians who are caught in a crossfire of Hamas’s making. That’s absolutely essential. Making sure that people in need get the assistance they need. We are working on this every single day. And as we’ve seen this evolve over the last four months, things have happened as a result of our engagement, our intervention, that I would say probably would not have happened, almost certainly wouldn’t have happened without it. But it’s not enough; it’s insufficient. And that’s why we’re at it almost, literally, 24 hours a day. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: May I add one thing on that? MODERATOR: What is – yes, sure. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Because for the full picture – and this is what we are discussing, and this is a good thing. In these horrible times, I’m always trying to see the glimpse of hope at the horizon. The good thing is that over the last three months, yeah, all these discussions were helpful in a way. First we didn’t have any humanitarian support; now we have at least a few trucks – not enough trucks. But also from the other understanding – and this is why I totally agree with the security guarantees for Israel – you cannot just say we need a ceasefire and the Israeli government, the IDF has to stop, and then we just wait and see what happens through the regrouping of Hamas. No, we have to give an answer to both legitimate security concerns. So our part of discussion is, for example, in the north, yeah? If people go back to the north, how do we as an international community secure that Hamas is not regrouping there, using, misusing against civilians as human protection shield? And this is also part of our common international security response. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, what is the view from India? What would you – if you had some advice for your colleagues, what would you be – what would you tell them? FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Well, I don’t have advice for my colleagues, though I – particularly, I think all of us follow the enormous efforts which Tony is putting in right now. But look, the way we look at it, there are different dimensions, different elements to this. Number one, we must be clear that what happened on October 7th was terrorism. No caveats, no justification, no explanation. It was terrorism. Number two, as Israel responds, it is important that Israel should be – should have been very mindful of civilian casualties, that it has an obligation to observe international humanitarian law. Number three, the return of hostages is today imperative. Number four, there is a need for a humanitarian corridor, a sustainable humanitarian corridor to provide relief. And eventually, there has to be a permanent fix, a long-term fix, otherwise we’re going to see a recurrence. And I think today, suddenly – India has long believed in a two-state solution; we have maintained that position for many decades. And I think today, many more countries in the world today feel not just that a two-state solution is necessary, but it is more urgent than it was before. MODERATOR: Let me take a couple of questions. I think there is a gentleman there, and then there and there. Okay, three. Let’s take – let’s take all three questions. Actually, we’ll take four questions very quickly. PARTICIPANT: Four is here? MODERATOR: Yes, four is there. QUESTION: Nathalie Tocci, Rome. A question – in fact, both to Secretary Blinken and to Foreign Minister Baerbock. I mean, the logic of the argument of being somewhat reticent on pushing for a ceasefire, as far as I understand, is basically that of saying, well, one needs to make sure that what happened on the 7th of October does not happen again. And so the question that I ask you is, do you think that what is happening now, what has happened over the last four months, will actually reduce the chances of what happened on the 7th of October happening again? Will it actually make Israel more secure or not? MODERATOR: Okay, so there is — FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: And I (inaudible). MODERATOR: Okay, so I thought that question was that side, but okay. QUESTION: Okay, thank you very much. Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of the parliament of Ukraine. Secretary Blinken, you said those who are not at the table are in the menu. Ukraine was at the table in Budapest when we voluntarily gave up our nuclear weaponry. Now we are in the menu. So the question is, what is the way for us? We are confronted with a nuclear power. Either we will become a member of NATO Alliance with a nuclear power or we should restore our nuclear status. I don’t see any other option. What option do you prefer and what you will answer on this? Thank you very much. MODERATOR: Okay. There’s a question here, question there, and then we’ll do one round. Would that be okay? PARTICIPANT: Do you want me to get — MODERATOR: Yes, I mean, I have said – yeah, here we go. QUESTION: Thank you. My name is Shafik Gabr, from Egypt. My question is to Secretary Blinken. You’ve invested an incredible amount of time trying to bring a settlement in the issue of Gaza, and at the very same time we all feel in the region that things can spill over in a very dramatic way. Especially, there are many excuses of why not to have a solution, but to do things step by step. That is not going to work. So my question to you is, sir, why, with all the countries, including the United States, including the UK, just what Cameron has just said, proclaiming a two-state solution is not something the United States puts on the floor now and be able to achieve that? MODERATOR: Okay, thank you. Thank you. Finally, there’s a question there, and then I’m afraid — QUESTION: I have a loud voice; I don’t need a microphone. Hello, my name is Masih Alinejad. I’m an Iranian troublemaker for mullahs, and I have a simple question. We cannot talk about global security by forgetting about Iran, by burying the human rights abuses under the carpet. I am here today with a woman who was in the front line of last year’s uprising. She was shot in her eye; she lost her eyes because of the Revolutionary Guards. So my question is very clear: How we can reach to peace and security in the world without designating the Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization, which the United States of America did that – thanks – but why the allies are not following the United States? The democratic countries are not as united as autocracy, because Islamic Republic is helping Putin, is helping Hamas, all the proxies in Yemen. So as we see, unfortunately, dictators are more united than democratic countries. Do you have any common strategy to isolate Islamic Repulbic and address Khamenei and his gang of killers the way that you address Putin? Thank you so much. MODERATOR: Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.) All three of you, you can pick the question you want to answer. I know one was directed – a couple were directed at Secretary Blinken. So maybe — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Want me to start? MODERATOR: Maybe you start. Yeah. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good. So to the question, is Israel more secure now after – four months after October 7th, I think the answer is, in the near term, in the immediate, yes it is, in terms of dealing with the immediate threat, the horrific terrorist group that attacked it in the most unimaginable ways on October 7th. Is it more secure for the long term? That’s a different question. Because the fundamental question we have to ask ourselves is – and Jai mentioned this – how do we make sure that the cycle one way or another doesn’t repeat itself, whether it’s a year from now, five years from now, or 10 years from now? I think there’s an extraordinary opportunity before Israel in the months ahead to actually once and for all end that cycle. And it’s because there are some new facts that didn’t exist before when there were efforts to make peace between Israelis and Palestinians, starting with the fact that virtually every Arab country now genuinely wants to integrate Israel into the region, to normalize relations if they haven’t already done so, to provide security assurances and commitments so that Israel can feel more safe and more secure. At the same time, there are genuine efforts underway led by Arab countries to reform, revitalize, revamp the Palestinian Authority so that it can be more effective in representing the interests of the Palestinian people and could be a better partner for Israel in that future. And there’s also, I think, the imperative that Jai mentioned that’s more urgent than ever: to proceed to a Palestinian state, one that also ensures the security of Israel and makes the necessary commitments to do so. If you put all of that together, you have an integrated region where people are actually working together for the common good, a region in which Israel is secure in ways that it’s never been before, and where the number one threat to its security as well as the security of many of us – just alluded to in the last question, Iran – is isolated along with all of its proxies. That future, that path is there, it’s clear, it’s hard, it’s complicated, but it’s real. The alternative is an endless repetition of the cycle that we’ve seen year after year, decade after decade, generation after generation. It’s incumbent upon all of us who have relationships with and responsibility for different countries in the region, things that we bring to the table ourselves, to make the hard decisions, do the difficult things to actually make that path clear, real, and one that – whose attraction is overwhelmingly powerful. I think the more we’re able to do that and the more we distinguish between that path and the alternative, the greater the chance we’ll actually see movement in that direction. I’ll say just very quickly on Ukraine, I think you’ve heard throughout this conference, including by the fact that we have an extraordinary delegation from the United States Congress here – Republicans, Democrats, Senate, House – that there is enduring support for Ukraine, and that’s not just from the United States, it’s from country after country in Europe and well beyond, for a whole variety of reasons, starting of course with the aggression that the Ukrainians have suffered, but also because that aggression has gone to the very principles at the heart of the international system that each of us has a stake in preserving, and that’s not going away. So there’s a tremendous determination on the part of dozens of countries to do two things. First, to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs to deal in the immediate with the ongoing Russian aggression; but second, to put Ukraine on a path where increasingly in the months and years to come it’s able to stand strongly on its own two feet militarily, economically, and democratically. That is the strongest possible rebuke to Putin. It’s the strongest possible rebuke to all those who would seek to undermine Ukraine. And I’ll just conclude with this: The real lesson to be drawn from what we’ve seen – including, as you rightly said, Russia tearing up and then spitting on the Budapest Memorandum, among many, many other agreements – is that this aggression against Ukraine has been an absolute strategic debacle for Vladimir Putin and for Russia. Russia is weaker militarily, it’s weaker economically, it’s weaker diplomatically. Europe has ended its energy dependence on Russia in the space of two years. Ukrainians are more united than they’ve ever been, including against Russia, which was not the case certainly in 2014 – not desirable, but it’s the result of Russia’s actions – and certainly since 2022. We have the NATO Alliance, a defensive Alliance with no intent of ever attacking Russia, only there to defend its members, that is now stronger and larger. All of this a result of actions that Russia has taken, precipitating the very things it said it wanted to prevent. So I think as those lessons are digested, not to mention the horrific losses that Russia has suffered as a result of Vladimir Putin throwing its young men into a meatgrinder of his own making, I think the more those lessons are digested, the more you’re going to see that this is not repeated. But that requires all of us to maintain the solidarity that we’ve demonstrated with Ukraine, a solidarity that is important not just for Ukraine, but for all of us. The stakes couldn’t be higher. So my belief, again, listening to everyone here over the last couple of days, talking to our members of Congress who are with us, is that not only is that support there, it will be sustained, and Ukraine will succeed. MODERATOR: Thank you, Secretary. Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, I guess the question from Iran was for us. So the question was, why do you not follow the example and list them as terrorists, in a terrorist sanction regime, the Revolutionary Guard? We have discussed it quite often, but the quick answer is because I’m defending rule of law, trying without any double standards. And our legal situation in the European Union – and you can like it or not, but this is how – in which context we are working – in our European legal system, we have a sanction system for listing under terrorism if terrorism occurs in another country, especially in the European Union. It was after the attacks on the U.S. on the 9th of September. So we need a legal ground to list them. So far, we do not have the evidence and proof that there have been these terrorist attacks in the European Union. There were different cases. It’s a different legal system in the U.S. But – and this is important for me because I hear this argument again and again – this is not because we shy away with regard to the Revolutionary Guard or the crimes against women, youth, civil society, its own population. No. We use the instruments we are having as a European Union to defend human rights. And we set up for the first time in history of the European Union a sanction systems because of human rights violation. And for me this is even stronger. In the past, it was the same with Daesh and the crimes against Yezidi women, yeah? They have been brought to court not slaughtering women, not saying these are the worst sexual violence crimes you commit, but under terrorism. I think this is wrong. We have to name the crimes, and the crime is targeted directly to women, directly to human rights. We say we sanction you because of what you have done to you shooting in your eyes, killing your friends, killing your sisters. And it’s the same effect. And this it comes all down to me – for me, politics, it’s not about symbolic action. It’s about what matters for the people. And under the sanction system, human rights sanctions from the EU, Revolutionary Guard – we named them – cannot enter the European Union. We have frozen their assets. So the result is exactly the same what the U.S. has done under the terrorist sanction system. So if you’re asking, do we act as a result in the same way? Yes, we do, but we call it human rights sanction system because these are the worst human rights violations you can see. And this comes also back to the other question about symbolic politics or what matters in reality. We would have been at a total different stage if, after the 7th of October – this was a question from Italy – after the 7th of October, we could have had a common resolution. We were in Cairo at the so-called peace summit together with different countries, many Arab partners, and also from the European Union. We tried to fix a text where we would say, okay, after these horrible crimes of the 7th of October, there could be the momentum now for whatever generations have dreamt of: a two-state solution pathway. But in order to do that, we have to guarantee that the 7th of October never happens again to Israel and we have to guarantee that Palestinians have the security to live in peace and security for them. Unfortunately, those meeting there together, not everybody was ready to name the 7th of October what it was: a terrorist attack from Hamas on Israeli people. And this is why we passed this momentum. I regret it, but this is how life is. So now again we have to work again if we now, after four months where we see that the current situation only brings misery for everybody, if we can regroup again. And this is why what we have described before, for us it’s so important to work together as European Union, as the U.S., with Arab partners to find what we need: guarantees that Israelis can live forever in security; that the 7th of October can never happen again; and the same counts for Palestinian people – it has to be an irreversible path towards a two-state solution. And this is our job which we have to do right now, and we can only do it together with the different partners. Neither the U.S., definitely not Germany, but also not one Arab country alone can go this path. We have to group and unite together for the peace in the Middle East. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Inshallah, as they would say in the Middle East. One — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: So I’ll just take a minute. MODERATOR: One minute, yes. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: I think a very large number of countries, especially of the Global South, believe that terrorism shouldn’t be countenanced or justified. But they equally strongly believe that a two-state solution should not be delayed. These are not choices. These are both musts. And unless we are able to address both these issues, we are not going to really solve the problem. MODERATOR: Well, thank you all. I know that we’ve gone over time, so apologies for that. And thank you to the audience. (Applause.) |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar At the Munich Security Conference |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 03:49 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof MODERATOR: (In progress) for Germany. Welcome. (Applause.) Antony Blinken, Secretary of State of the U.S. (Applause.) Nice to have you. And Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs, Republic of India. Minister. (Applause.) I hope that based on the topic of the session that you will not all agree with each other and we can have some sparks. We have about 43 minutes, and I will prepare your questions because I’ll ask a few questions and then I’ll turn to the audience. Minister Baerbock, I’m going to start with you. Germany’s national security strategy calls for expanding global partnerships and is quite open about the multipolarity of the world today. How do you go about it at a time when there are so many divisions, and particularly when increasingly we feel the Global South and the Western world are not on the same page? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, first of all, good afternoon. Very good to have this important session with my dear colleagues. In a nutshell, it’s more important than ever. Because we are not naïve: Obviously, there are ruthless actors who don’t want to – to drub up the title of our panel – negotiate the slice of the pie, but they want to rob the whole bakery. And having that in mind, I believe it’s even more important than ever that those who are at the table negotiating about the slices of the pie stay there, first of all, resolute, respectfully, and also reflective. And this is the core also of our national security strategy, which we have drafted as the German government, making very clear in the light of this ruthless war of aggression against Ukraine that we are resolute in defending international law. It’s the best protection for everybody around the world. So there is no question about negotiating whether Ukraine has right of self-defense or not. We all agreed not only – I don’t like that word, but “Western” actors – we all agreed in our Charter of the United Nations there is the right of self-defense, and we all agreed on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Having said that, obviously we have to be respectful that especially within Ukraine – and I think this is the lesson we have learned, and it was very important to speak to partners like India and so many around the world – Brazil, South Africa – we have to be respectful that obviously, in this moment when we said we need the whole international security, others asked some questions, like: Where have you been when we needed you? Or asked some question, so actually what does it mean for the future? Do you also stand with us? And this is, I would say, maybe something you in the attitude – at least from our foreign politics from Europe to say, okay, we cannot take for granted that everybody just agrees with our European or transatlantic vision. And the third part, I think it’s the most easy, but it’s the strongest asset for democracies. The strength of democracy, in my point of view, is that we can be self-reflective and self-critical. So asking in a moment when others – for example, war of aggression – were not saying automatically, okay, we support you, not saying why don’t you get it, but asking ourself why they cannot support us. And I think this is the critical part but the most powerful part, and at least, again, in our national security strategy we try to do it, talking about, for example, our colonialism past. Understanding why South Africa was mentioning the whole time their ties with Russia in the Apartheid regime. And being self-critical and saying, oh, yeah, not all democracies have stood back in time at their side, and taking that as something where we said, yes, we might have made a mistake in the past, but we cannot change the past; we can only change the future together. I think this is the strength of multilateralism, and we see around the world the majority believes in it. MODERATOR: Do you find that increasingly people are questioning more when it comes to – let’s stick to Ukraine and we’ll get to Gaza in a minute. But on Ukraine, are people coming around to your point of view or are they distancing themselves more? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, to see it over the least three years, I mean, we have seen the 142 voting in the General Assembly, so it is a majority of states. Because most of the countries in the world, like mine – we’re not the biggest country in the world; we don’t have the biggest military means. And this is for most of the countries: They know that the Charter of the United Nations, the rule of law is their life insurance. So we see this big majority there when you see also the support. Many have traveled – and I think this is really important to give always the question of war of aggression a human face. It was not that we convinced some other actors in the world by saying now you have to stand with that, but when a delegation traveled to Kyiv – and not only Kyiv, to Bucha, to Irpin – when they spoke, like we did, to the parents of those where their child had been kidnapped by Russia, then we give this ideation a human face, and that’s all about. And this is why it’s so important to not only talk about state, but we talk about the people, talk about also the question of the rule of law in front of the International Criminal Court, for example, bringing crimes against humanity in front of the court. And there we see again the majority of the states is pushing for that one. MODERATOR: Secretary Blinken, there is a – there is a feeling that – it’s more than a feeling, it’s what we see on – happening on the ground, that the U.S.-China tensions are leading to greater fragmentation and that you’re almost competing for alliances: who’s our ally? And we see this within the UN, in various UN institutions, but we just see it all around the globe. To what extent do you feel that you are challenged in your travels around the world on the fundamental questions? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, it’s wonderful to be with my friends, wonderful to be back in Munich at the Security Conference, known among all of us as speed dating for diplomats. (Laughter.) But we’ve done a couple of things, and I’ll come quickly to your question. From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that. When it comes to strategic competition – and there’s no doubt that we have one with China – there are a few things to be said. First, we have an obligation to manage that relationship responsibly, and I think that’s something that we hear from countries around the world, and it’s clearly in our interest to do so, and that’s exactly what President Biden is doing. And when it comes to other countries, the point is not to say to country X, Y, or Z, “You have to choose;” the point is to offer a good choice. And if we can do that – and I believe we can and we have and will continue – then I think the choice becomes fairly self-evident. Over the last six or seven months, we have engaged in a sustainable way with China. I just met my counterpart Wang Yi here in Munich, but that follows a series of meetings, notably and most importantly President Biden and President Xi, and I think we’ve brought greater stability to the relationship, not moving away from or ignoring the fact that, yes, we have a competition, there are areas where we are contesting each other, but there are also areas where we can and should cooperate because it’s in our interest to do that. One of the best examples of that is the agreement reached with China on fentanyl. The single largest – the number one killer, number one killer of Americans aged 18 to 49 is the synthetic opioid, fentanyl. Now we have meaningful cooperation from and with China on fentanyl. That’s going to make a difference in the lives of Americans. MODERATOR: And do you think it is sustainable to have cooperation on – in some areas, climate being one of them, but to have a strategic competition – the strategic competition that defines geopolitics today and that will go on for a very long time? Do you think that that is sustainable that both sides sort of can find rules of engagement? This is where we compete and this is where we cooperate? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Some fundamentals haven’t changed. Countries will act in their self-interest. Where we have to compete, we will. Where we have to contest, we will. Where it makes sense to cooperate, we will. And I think you can do all of the above at the same time. But there’s something else that’s, I think, changed, and it goes back to the first part of the question. The very fact that we’ve re-engaged and rejuvenated as well as reimagined some of our alliances and partnerships, along with the investments that we’ve made at home in the United States – the investments we’ve made in our infrastructure, the investments we’ve made in science and technology and chips, the building blocks of the 21st century economy, the investments we’ve made in climate technology – you put those two things together: investments at home, much greater alignment with partners and allies across the board in Europe, in the Indo-Pacific, in Asia on how to approach a question as complicated as relations with China – that puts us in a position of much greater strength in dealing with all of the challenges that we have to deal with. MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, India has more of a multiple-choice mindset. Is – would that be – would that be right? From nonalignment to – I think you may have called it or somebody else called it “all-alignment.” So you can pick and choose alliances, but you can also pick and choose topics. On Russia, for example, you still buy Russian oil. Is that okay with your counterpart from the U.S.? Everything is – your relationship is fine? You can do whatever you want whenever you want? (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Okay. First of all — MODERATOR: I mean, you’re sitting next to each other, so — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: No, no. First of all, delighted to be here, and I couldn’t find a better set of people to be with on the stage. So thank you for whoever put us on together. Your question: Do we have multiple options? The answer is yes. Is that a problem? Why should it be a problem? If I’m smart enough to have multiple options, you should be admiring me, you shouldn’t be criticizing me. (Laughter and applause.) Now, is that a problem for other people? I don’t think so. I don’t think so, certainly in this case and in that case. Because, look, we try to explain what are the different pulls and pressures which countries have. And it’s very hard to have a unidimensional relationship. Now, again, different countries and different relationships have different histories. If I were to look, say, between the U.S. and Germany, it is rooted – there’s an alliance nature to it; there’s a certain history on which that relationship is grounded. In our case it’s very different. So I don’t want you to even inadvertently give the impression that we are purely and unsentimentally transactional. We are not. We get along with people. We believe in things, we share things, we agree on some things. But there are times when you’re located in different places, have different levels of development, different experiences – all of that gets into it. So life is complicated. Life is differentiated. And I think it’s very important today not to reduce the entire complexity of our world into very sweeping propositions. I think that era is today behind us. So I agree very much with what Tony said, which is good partners provide choices. Smart partners take some of those choices. But sometimes there will be choices on which you say, well, I think I’ll pass up on that one. MODERATOR: It’s a very good point, which brings me to the BRICS and the rise of middle powers, because that is one of the shifts that we see today. To what extent do you think that that is a challenge to the West, or maybe that can be sort of the bridge, especially in a world where we will see continued competition between the U.S. and China? And I’m going to ask Minister Jaishankar first and – but I’d love for both of you to comment as well. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Yeah, I thought maybe the BRICS one you wanted the U.S. to — SECRETARY BLINKEN: After you, Jai, please. (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: But look, again, I think it’s important to go back to how it began. The BRICS started in an era where Western dominance was very strong. The premier gathering of the world was the G7, and you had a number of significant powers in the world who felt that, well, they were not part of the G7 but maybe they also brought value to the table by sitting and discussing with others. So in a sense you had a collection of these countries. It was originally four; South Africa joined later. And if you look at it, it’s a very interesting group because it’s geographically as disparate as it can be. Yet it is bound by the fact that these discussions we’ve had over a decade and a half have been very useful for all of us. Now, like any product, you test it in the market at some point. We tested it last year and asked people, so how many of you want to join BRICS? And we got almost 30 countries who were willing to join BRICS. So clearly, if 30 countries saw value in it, there must be something good we have done. So I think it’s important today to make a distinction between being non-West and anti-West. I would certainly characterize India as a country which is non-West, but which has an extremely strong relationship with Western countries getting better by the day. Not everybody else necessarily in that grouping might qualify for that description. But the contribution the BRICS has made – if one looks at the G7 and how it evolved into the G20, I think in a way those additional 13 members who came into this bigger grouping, five of them are BRICS members. The fact that there was another group which was meeting regularly and discussing and debating I think certainly was an input into the expansion of the G7 into the G20. So I think we did a service to the world. MODERATOR: Yeah. Secretary Blinken? SECRETARY BLINKEN: I’m tempted to say what my friend said and leave it at that. Look, the – what we don’t need to do and what we’re not doing is trying to somehow design the world into rigid blocks. Each and every one of the issues that we have to deal with, and deal with in the interests of the American people, may have different collections and coalitions of countries that are focused on it, that bring certain experiences, certain capacities, and I think about it as variable geometry. We’re putting together a puzzle with collections of countries, and not just countries, organizations of different sizes and different shapes to deal with a given problem. As Jai said, we have – and of course the fact that the relationship between our countries, I would argue, is the strongest it’s ever been, it makes no difference that India happens to be a leading member of BRICS. We’re a leading member of the G7. We have the G20 and we have a multiplicity of things that we’re doing together every single day in different ways of organizing ourselves. India and the United States working together in AUKUS, working together – I mean, excuse me, in the Quad, working together in a variety of other fora. All of this goes to the point that the complexity and the multiplicity of the challenges that we have demands that we find different ways to work together, and this shouldn’t be done on an exclusive basis. Look, our default, of course, is to work in the first instance with fellow democracies. That’s only normal and natural. But we are not only willing, we are actively working with any country that wants to solve a particular problem and wants to do so within the context of a rules-based order. That’s the way we approach things. MODERATOR: Speaking of a rule-based order, major powers today are criticized for sort of upholding the rule-based order and upholding values in certain areas but not in others, and a lot of people around the world – and particularly in the Global South but I would say not only in the Global South; even within our Western democracies – are confused. They look at what’s happening in Gaza and at the intensity of the killing, and they ask: Where are human rights? Where are these Western values? I’m sure you’re having here today and yesterday a lot of similar discussions, Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Yes, and they are so productive because many of them are not only speed dating, but behind closed doors, very trustfully. And I think the most important job for those who believe in a rules-based international order, be it politicians, be it journalists, be it citizens, is to not be pushed into this speed dating, into this black-and-white world in all of our bubbles. Because easily – and this is a double-standard question, yeah – if you only look – and you mentioned the situation in Gaza. If I only see the whole time on YouTube what’s happening in Gaza, and I do that every second day – every day I cannot stand it because otherwise I couldn’t get out of my bed anymore – yeah, your reality is obviously – the only thing what we can and have to do right now is to go in a total ceasefire to rescue these innocent children dying there every day. Yeah? So, and you’re 100 percent right by that. But the question is to really come to this reality is to force myself – not myself, but all these persons who are saying this is the moral right thing to do – to then also ask: So how do we come to that? And this is then when some might ask: So why you, German foreign minister, didn’t call for immediate ceasefire the last – months ago? Because I also looked at the other side, at the other YouTube videos, at the other bubbles, yeah, where we saw, I saw for days after the 7th of October – I didn’t only see it, I spoke to the father whose wife and two little girls had been kidnapped by terrorists from Hamas. I saw the video where women have been not only raped, but murdered afterwards. And in that moment for me it was clear, again, that we can also not only relate to the past saying, okay, we know how negotiations about – with terrorists are working. Because if you saw that video and if you were ready to see this woman suffering there, you understand that this is not only a military logic. Because those people who are doing this, raping a woman and killing her afterwards, they don’t want to exchange soldiers for political prisoners. They enjoy slaughtering women. I’m saying that because I think this is really important, bringing it down to the people. Because then you understand in this kind of situation, how do we come now to a ceasefire? That the release of hostages, the release of these women is crucial because otherwise we can never save the children in Gaza. So this comes all back to what my dear colleague Jaishankar has said. If we are not capable of stepping out of right or wrong, yes or no, black or white, we will in this world of dilemmas never do what our job – I would say the three of us here – is: to do all the best to rescue people. And this is why we have been working so intensively for those partners, Arab partners, in the last three months to see how we can come together for the most important point right now: freeing the hostages, having a humanitarian pause to bring in humanitarian support into Gaza, and not stopping even though the headlines are there every day: You cannot fix it anyhow. I think the biggest favor for those who do not care for human rights and the international order is that we are giving up and that we are not being ready to look at these different topics from our different side. And this is why – at least for me; I would say for all the three of us – use our competences, use our channels we are having. And there again diversity is beneficial. If we are not all the same, but if we are trying to solve this horrible war in the Middle East from our different perspectives, then we can also bring security both for the people in Israel and the people in Gaza. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I have to say I fully subscribe – (applause) – fully subscribe to everything that Annalena said. And I think as people in positions, for a brief period of time, of responsibility, but also, and maybe foremost, as human beings – as mothers, fathers, children, brothers, and sisters – we’re intensely driven to try to prevent or stop human suffering, including the suffering of men, women, and children in Gaza. The question is how to do it most effectively and how to take account of the incredible complexity that Annalena just outlined so well. But there’s another element to this that we have a responsibility to do something about. The greatest poison in our common well is dehumanization. And we see that in all directions. And if you lose sight of the humanity of someone else, then your heart is hardened to a point where anything is acceptable and anything is possible. Part of our responsibility is to do what we can to push back, to avoid, to call out dehumanization wherever it’s coming from, in whatever direction. Because if we can’t get at that, it’s very hard, if not impossible, to do other things. MODERATOR: One other criticism that I think I’m sure you hear a lot is U.S. policy has, of course, shifted in the last couple of months, but yet you want the fighting to stop, but there is no sign whatsoever that you’re not willing to send weapons to Israel, for example. So that also confuses people. When they look at the rhetoric versus the action, what would you say to that? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, we’re committed to Israel’s security. That’s been clear from day one. It remains clear. And we understand and support the proposition that Israel has to find ways to make sure that what happened on October 7th never happens again. (Applause.) So we start there. But we’ve also said – and not only said, we’ve acted on the proposition – that, of course, the way Israel does that matters profoundly. The way it does it in terms of trying to ensure greater protection for civilians who are caught in a crossfire of Hamas’s making. That’s absolutely essential. Making sure that people in need get the assistance they need. We are working on this every single day. And as we’ve seen this evolve over the last four months, things have happened as a result of our engagement, our intervention, that I would say probably would not have happened, almost certainly wouldn’t have happened without it. But it’s not enough; it’s insufficient. And that’s why we’re at it almost, literally, 24 hours a day. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: May I add one thing on that? MODERATOR: What is – yes, sure. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Because for the full picture – and this is what we are discussing, and this is a good thing. In these horrible times, I’m always trying to see the glimpse of hope at the horizon. The good thing is that over the last three months, yeah, all these discussions were helpful in a way. First we didn’t have any humanitarian support; now we have at least a few trucks – not enough trucks. But also from the other understanding – and this is why I totally agree with the security guarantees for Israel – you cannot just say we need a ceasefire and the Israeli government, the IDF has to stop, and then we just wait and see what happens through the regrouping of Hamas. No, we have to give an answer to both legitimate security concerns. So our part of discussion is, for example, in the north, yeah? If people go back to the north, how do we as an international community secure that Hamas is not regrouping there, using, misusing against civilians as human protection shield? And this is also part of our common international security response. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, what is the view from India? What would you – if you had some advice for your colleagues, what would you be – what would you tell them? FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Well, I don’t have advice for my colleagues, though I – particularly, I think all of us follow the enormous efforts which Tony is putting in right now. But look, the way we look at it, there are different dimensions, different elements to this. Number one, we must be clear that what happened on October 7th was terrorism. No caveats, no justification, no explanation. It was terrorism. Number two, as Israel responds, it is important that Israel should be – should have been very mindful of civilian casualties, that it has an obligation to observe international humanitarian law. Number three, the return of hostages is today imperative. Number four, there is a need for a humanitarian corridor, a sustainable humanitarian corridor to provide relief. And eventually, there has to be a permanent fix, a long-term fix, otherwise we’re going to see a recurrence. And I think today, suddenly – India has long believed in a two-state solution; we have maintained that position for many decades. And I think today, many more countries in the world today feel not just that a two-state solution is necessary, but it is more urgent than it was before. MODERATOR: Let me take a couple of questions. I think there is a gentleman there, and then there and there. Okay, three. Let’s take – let’s take all three questions. Actually, we’ll take four questions very quickly. PARTICIPANT: Four is here? MODERATOR: Yes, four is there. QUESTION: Nathalie Tocci, Rome. A question – in fact, both to Secretary Blinken and to Foreign Minister Baerbock. I mean, the logic of the argument of being somewhat reticent on pushing for a ceasefire, as far as I understand, is basically that of saying, well, one needs to make sure that what happened on the 7th of October does not happen again. And so the question that I ask you is, do you think that what is happening now, what has happened over the last four months, will actually reduce the chances of what happened on the 7th of October happening again? Will it actually make Israel more secure or not? MODERATOR: Okay, so there is — FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: And I (inaudible). MODERATOR: Okay, so I thought that question was that side, but okay. QUESTION: Okay, thank you very much. Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of the parliament of Ukraine. Secretary Blinken, you said those who are not at the table are in the menu. Ukraine was at the table in Budapest when we voluntarily gave up our nuclear weaponry. Now we are in the menu. So the question is, what is the way for us? We are confronted with a nuclear power. Either we will become a member of NATO Alliance with a nuclear power or we should restore our nuclear status. I don’t see any other option. What option do you prefer and what you will answer on this? Thank you very much. MODERATOR: Okay. There’s a question here, question there, and then we’ll do one round. Would that be okay? PARTICIPANT: Do you want me to get — MODERATOR: Yes, I mean, I have said – yeah, here we go. QUESTION: Thank you. My name is Shafik Gabr, from Egypt. My question is to Secretary Blinken. You’ve invested an incredible amount of time trying to bring a settlement in the issue of Gaza, and at the very same time we all feel in the region that things can spill over in a very dramatic way. Especially, there are many excuses of why not to have a solution, but to do things step by step. That is not going to work. So my question to you is, sir, why, with all the countries, including the United States, including the UK, just what Cameron has just said, proclaiming a two-state solution is not something the United States puts on the floor now and be able to achieve that? MODERATOR: Okay, thank you. Thank you. Finally, there’s a question there, and then I’m afraid — QUESTION: I have a loud voice; I don’t need a microphone. Hello, my name is Masih Alinejad. I’m an Iranian troublemaker for mullahs, and I have a simple question. We cannot talk about global security by forgetting about Iran, by burying the human rights abuses under the carpet. I am here today with a woman who was in the front line of last year’s uprising. She was shot in her eye; she lost her eyes because of the Revolutionary Guards. So my question is very clear: How we can reach to peace and security in the world without designating the Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization, which the United States of America did that – thanks – but why the allies are not following the United States? The democratic countries are not as united as autocracy, because Islamic Republic is helping Putin, is helping Hamas, all the proxies in Yemen. So as we see, unfortunately, dictators are more united than democratic countries. Do you have any common strategy to isolate Islamic Repulbic and address Khamenei and his gang of killers the way that you address Putin? Thank you so much. MODERATOR: Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.) All three of you, you can pick the question you want to answer. I know one was directed – a couple were directed at Secretary Blinken. So maybe — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Want me to start? MODERATOR: Maybe you start. Yeah. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good. So to the question, is Israel more secure now after – four months after October 7th, I think the answer is, in the near term, in the immediate, yes it is, in terms of dealing with the immediate threat, the horrific terrorist group that attacked it in the most unimaginable ways on October 7th. Is it more secure for the long term? That’s a different question. Because the fundamental question we have to ask ourselves is – and Jai mentioned this – how do we make sure that the cycle one way or another doesn’t repeat itself, whether it’s a year from now, five years from now, or 10 years from now? I think there’s an extraordinary opportunity before Israel in the months ahead to actually once and for all end that cycle. And it’s because there are some new facts that didn’t exist before when there were efforts to make peace between Israelis and Palestinians, starting with the fact that virtually every Arab country now genuinely wants to integrate Israel into the region, to normalize relations if they haven’t already done so, to provide security assurances and commitments so that Israel can feel more safe and more secure. At the same time, there are genuine efforts underway led by Arab countries to reform, revitalize, revamp the Palestinian Authority so that it can be more effective in representing the interests of the Palestinian people and could be a better partner for Israel in that future. And there’s also, I think, the imperative that Jai mentioned that’s more urgent than ever: to proceed to a Palestinian state, one that also ensures the security of Israel and makes the necessary commitments to do so. If you put all of that together, you have an integrated region where people are actually working together for the common good, a region in which Israel is secure in ways that it’s never been before, and where the number one threat to its security as well as the security of many of us – just alluded to in the last question, Iran – is isolated along with all of its proxies. That future, that path is there, it’s clear, it’s hard, it’s complicated, but it’s real. The alternative is an endless repetition of the cycle that we’ve seen year after year, decade after decade, generation after generation. It’s incumbent upon all of us who have relationships with and responsibility for different countries in the region, things that we bring to the table ourselves, to make the hard decisions, do the difficult things to actually make that path clear, real, and one that – whose attraction is overwhelmingly powerful. I think the more we’re able to do that and the more we distinguish between that path and the alternative, the greater the chance we’ll actually see movement in that direction. I’ll say just very quickly on Ukraine, I think you’ve heard throughout this conference, including by the fact that we have an extraordinary delegation from the United States Congress here – Republicans, Democrats, Senate, House – that there is enduring support for Ukraine, and that’s not just from the United States, it’s from country after country in Europe and well beyond, for a whole variety of reasons, starting of course with the aggression that the Ukrainians have suffered, but also because that aggression has gone to the very principles at the heart of the international system that each of us has a stake in preserving, and that’s not going away. So there’s a tremendous determination on the part of dozens of countries to do two things. First, to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs to deal in the immediate with the ongoing Russian aggression; but second, to put Ukraine on a path where increasingly in the months and years to come it’s able to stand strongly on its own two feet militarily, economically, and democratically. That is the strongest possible rebuke to Putin. It’s the strongest possible rebuke to all those who would seek to undermine Ukraine. And I’ll just conclude with this: The real lesson to be drawn from what we’ve seen – including, as you rightly said, Russia tearing up and then spitting on the Budapest Memorandum, among many, many other agreements – is that this aggression against Ukraine has been an absolute strategic debacle for Vladimir Putin and for Russia. Russia is weaker militarily, it’s weaker economically, it’s weaker diplomatically. Europe has ended its energy dependence on Russia in the space of two years. Ukrainians are more united than they’ve ever been, including against Russia, which was not the case certainly in 2014 – not desirable, but it’s the result of Russia’s actions – and certainly since 2022. We have the NATO Alliance, a defensive Alliance with no intent of ever attacking Russia, only there to defend its members, that is now stronger and larger. All of this a result of actions that Russia has taken, precipitating the very things it said it wanted to prevent. So I think as those lessons are digested, not to mention the horrific losses that Russia has suffered as a result of Vladimir Putin throwing its young men into a meatgrinder of his own making, I think the more those lessons are digested, the more you’re going to see that this is not repeated. But that requires all of us to maintain the solidarity that we’ve demonstrated with Ukraine, a solidarity that is important not just for Ukraine, but for all of us. The stakes couldn’t be higher. So my belief, again, listening to everyone here over the last couple of days, talking to our members of Congress who are with us, is that not only is that support there, it will be sustained, and Ukraine will succeed. MODERATOR: Thank you, Secretary. Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, I guess the question from Iran was for us. So the question was, why do you not follow the example and list them as terrorists, in a terrorist sanction regime, the Revolutionary Guard? We have discussed it quite often, but the quick answer is because I’m defending rule of law, trying without any double standards. And our legal situation in the European Union – and you can like it or not, but this is how – in which context we are working – in our European legal system, we have a sanction system for listing under terrorism if terrorism occurs in another country, especially in the European Union. It was after the attacks on the U.S. on the 9th of September. So we need a legal ground to list them. So far, we do not have the evidence and proof that there have been these terrorist attacks in the European Union. There were different cases. It’s a different legal system in the U.S. But – and this is important for me because I hear this argument again and again – this is not because we shy away with regard to the Revolutionary Guard or the crimes against women, youth, civil society, its own population. No. We use the instruments we are having as a European Union to defend human rights. And we set up for the first time in history of the European Union a sanction systems because of human rights violation. And for me this is even stronger. In the past, it was the same with Daesh and the crimes against Yezidi women, yeah? They have been brought to court not slaughtering women, not saying these are the worst sexual violence crimes you commit, but under terrorism. I think this is wrong. We have to name the crimes, and the crime is targeted directly to women, directly to human rights. We say we sanction you because of what you have done to you shooting in your eyes, killing your friends, killing your sisters. And it’s the same effect. And this it comes all down to me – for me, politics, it’s not about symbolic action. It’s about what matters for the people. And under the sanction system, human rights sanctions from the EU, Revolutionary Guard – we named them – cannot enter the European Union. We have frozen their assets. So the result is exactly the same what the U.S. has done under the terrorist sanction system. So if you’re asking, do we act as a result in the same way? Yes, we do, but we call it human rights sanction system because these are the worst human rights violations you can see. And this comes also back to the other question about symbolic politics or what matters in reality. We would have been at a total different stage if, after the 7th of October – this was a question from Italy – after the 7th of October, we could have had a common resolution. We were in Cairo at the so-called peace summit together with different countries, many Arab partners, and also from the European Union. We tried to fix a text where we would say, okay, after these horrible crimes of the 7th of October, there could be the momentum now for whatever generations have dreamt of: a two-state solution pathway. But in order to do that, we have to guarantee that the 7th of October never happens again to Israel and we have to guarantee that Palestinians have the security to live in peace and security for them. Unfortunately, those meeting there together, not everybody was ready to name the 7th of October what it was: a terrorist attack from Hamas on Israeli people. And this is why we passed this momentum. I regret it, but this is how life is. So now again we have to work again if we now, after four months where we see that the current situation only brings misery for everybody, if we can regroup again. And this is why what we have described before, for us it’s so important to work together as European Union, as the U.S., with Arab partners to find what we need: guarantees that Israelis can live forever in security; that the 7th of October can never happen again; and the same counts for Palestinian people – it has to be an irreversible path towards a two-state solution. And this is our job which we have to do right now, and we can only do it together with the different partners. Neither the U.S., definitely not Germany, but also not one Arab country alone can go this path. We have to group and unite together for the peace in the Middle East. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Inshallah, as they would say in the Middle East. One — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: So I’ll just take a minute. MODERATOR: One minute, yes. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: I think a very large number of countries, especially of the Global South, believe that terrorism shouldn’t be countenanced or justified. But they equally strongly believe that a two-state solution should not be delayed. These are not choices. These are both musts. And unless we are able to address both these issues, we are not going to really solve the problem. MODERATOR: Well, thank you all. I know that we’ve gone over time, so apologies for that. And thank you to the audience. (Applause.) |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, And Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar At the Munich Security Conference |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 03:49 PM EST Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State Munich, Germany Bayerischer Hof MODERATOR: (In progress) for Germany. Welcome. (Applause.) Antony Blinken, Secretary of State of the U.S. (Applause.) Nice to have you. And Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs, Republic of India. Minister. (Applause.) I hope that based on the topic of the session that you will not all agree with each other and we can have some sparks. We have about 43 minutes, and I will prepare your questions because I’ll ask a few questions and then I’ll turn to the audience. Minister Baerbock, I’m going to start with you. Germany’s national security strategy calls for expanding global partnerships and is quite open about the multipolarity of the world today. How do you go about it at a time when there are so many divisions, and particularly when increasingly we feel the Global South and the Western world are not on the same page? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, first of all, good afternoon. Very good to have this important session with my dear colleagues. In a nutshell, it’s more important than ever. Because we are not naïve: Obviously, there are ruthless actors who don’t want to – to drub up the title of our panel – negotiate the slice of the pie, but they want to rob the whole bakery. And having that in mind, I believe it’s even more important than ever that those who are at the table negotiating about the slices of the pie stay there, first of all, resolute, respectfully, and also reflective. And this is the core also of our national security strategy, which we have drafted as the German government, making very clear in the light of this ruthless war of aggression against Ukraine that we are resolute in defending international law. It’s the best protection for everybody around the world. So there is no question about negotiating whether Ukraine has right of self-defense or not. We all agreed not only – I don’t like that word, but “Western” actors – we all agreed in our Charter of the United Nations there is the right of self-defense, and we all agreed on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Having said that, obviously we have to be respectful that especially within Ukraine – and I think this is the lesson we have learned, and it was very important to speak to partners like India and so many around the world – Brazil, South Africa – we have to be respectful that obviously, in this moment when we said we need the whole international security, others asked some questions, like: Where have you been when we needed you? Or asked some question, so actually what does it mean for the future? Do you also stand with us? And this is, I would say, maybe something you in the attitude – at least from our foreign politics from Europe to say, okay, we cannot take for granted that everybody just agrees with our European or transatlantic vision. And the third part, I think it’s the most easy, but it’s the strongest asset for democracies. The strength of democracy, in my point of view, is that we can be self-reflective and self-critical. So asking in a moment when others – for example, war of aggression – were not saying automatically, okay, we support you, not saying why don’t you get it, but asking ourself why they cannot support us. And I think this is the critical part but the most powerful part, and at least, again, in our national security strategy we try to do it, talking about, for example, our colonialism past. Understanding why South Africa was mentioning the whole time their ties with Russia in the Apartheid regime. And being self-critical and saying, oh, yeah, not all democracies have stood back in time at their side, and taking that as something where we said, yes, we might have made a mistake in the past, but we cannot change the past; we can only change the future together. I think this is the strength of multilateralism, and we see around the world the majority believes in it. MODERATOR: Do you find that increasingly people are questioning more when it comes to – let’s stick to Ukraine and we’ll get to Gaza in a minute. But on Ukraine, are people coming around to your point of view or are they distancing themselves more? FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, to see it over the least three years, I mean, we have seen the 142 voting in the General Assembly, so it is a majority of states. Because most of the countries in the world, like mine – we’re not the biggest country in the world; we don’t have the biggest military means. And this is for most of the countries: They know that the Charter of the United Nations, the rule of law is their life insurance. So we see this big majority there when you see also the support. Many have traveled – and I think this is really important to give always the question of war of aggression a human face. It was not that we convinced some other actors in the world by saying now you have to stand with that, but when a delegation traveled to Kyiv – and not only Kyiv, to Bucha, to Irpin – when they spoke, like we did, to the parents of those where their child had been kidnapped by Russia, then we give this ideation a human face, and that’s all about. And this is why it’s so important to not only talk about state, but we talk about the people, talk about also the question of the rule of law in front of the International Criminal Court, for example, bringing crimes against humanity in front of the court. And there we see again the majority of the states is pushing for that one. MODERATOR: Secretary Blinken, there is a – there is a feeling that – it’s more than a feeling, it’s what we see on – happening on the ground, that the U.S.-China tensions are leading to greater fragmentation and that you’re almost competing for alliances: who’s our ally? And we see this within the UN, in various UN institutions, but we just see it all around the globe. To what extent do you feel that you are challenged in your travels around the world on the fundamental questions? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, it’s wonderful to be with my friends, wonderful to be back in Munich at the Security Conference, known among all of us as speed dating for diplomats. (Laughter.) But we’ve done a couple of things, and I’ll come quickly to your question. From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that. When it comes to strategic competition – and there’s no doubt that we have one with China – there are a few things to be said. First, we have an obligation to manage that relationship responsibly, and I think that’s something that we hear from countries around the world, and it’s clearly in our interest to do so, and that’s exactly what President Biden is doing. And when it comes to other countries, the point is not to say to country X, Y, or Z, “You have to choose;” the point is to offer a good choice. And if we can do that – and I believe we can and we have and will continue – then I think the choice becomes fairly self-evident. Over the last six or seven months, we have engaged in a sustainable way with China. I just met my counterpart Wang Yi here in Munich, but that follows a series of meetings, notably and most importantly President Biden and President Xi, and I think we’ve brought greater stability to the relationship, not moving away from or ignoring the fact that, yes, we have a competition, there are areas where we are contesting each other, but there are also areas where we can and should cooperate because it’s in our interest to do that. One of the best examples of that is the agreement reached with China on fentanyl. The single largest – the number one killer, number one killer of Americans aged 18 to 49 is the synthetic opioid, fentanyl. Now we have meaningful cooperation from and with China on fentanyl. That’s going to make a difference in the lives of Americans. MODERATOR: And do you think it is sustainable to have cooperation on – in some areas, climate being one of them, but to have a strategic competition – the strategic competition that defines geopolitics today and that will go on for a very long time? Do you think that that is sustainable that both sides sort of can find rules of engagement? This is where we compete and this is where we cooperate? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Some fundamentals haven’t changed. Countries will act in their self-interest. Where we have to compete, we will. Where we have to contest, we will. Where it makes sense to cooperate, we will. And I think you can do all of the above at the same time. But there’s something else that’s, I think, changed, and it goes back to the first part of the question. The very fact that we’ve re-engaged and rejuvenated as well as reimagined some of our alliances and partnerships, along with the investments that we’ve made at home in the United States – the investments we’ve made in our infrastructure, the investments we’ve made in science and technology and chips, the building blocks of the 21st century economy, the investments we’ve made in climate technology – you put those two things together: investments at home, much greater alignment with partners and allies across the board in Europe, in the Indo-Pacific, in Asia on how to approach a question as complicated as relations with China – that puts us in a position of much greater strength in dealing with all of the challenges that we have to deal with. MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, India has more of a multiple-choice mindset. Is – would that be – would that be right? From nonalignment to – I think you may have called it or somebody else called it “all-alignment.” So you can pick and choose alliances, but you can also pick and choose topics. On Russia, for example, you still buy Russian oil. Is that okay with your counterpart from the U.S.? Everything is – your relationship is fine? You can do whatever you want whenever you want? (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Okay. First of all — MODERATOR: I mean, you’re sitting next to each other, so — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: No, no. First of all, delighted to be here, and I couldn’t find a better set of people to be with on the stage. So thank you for whoever put us on together. Your question: Do we have multiple options? The answer is yes. Is that a problem? Why should it be a problem? If I’m smart enough to have multiple options, you should be admiring me, you shouldn’t be criticizing me. (Laughter and applause.) Now, is that a problem for other people? I don’t think so. I don’t think so, certainly in this case and in that case. Because, look, we try to explain what are the different pulls and pressures which countries have. And it’s very hard to have a unidimensional relationship. Now, again, different countries and different relationships have different histories. If I were to look, say, between the U.S. and Germany, it is rooted – there’s an alliance nature to it; there’s a certain history on which that relationship is grounded. In our case it’s very different. So I don’t want you to even inadvertently give the impression that we are purely and unsentimentally transactional. We are not. We get along with people. We believe in things, we share things, we agree on some things. But there are times when you’re located in different places, have different levels of development, different experiences – all of that gets into it. So life is complicated. Life is differentiated. And I think it’s very important today not to reduce the entire complexity of our world into very sweeping propositions. I think that era is today behind us. So I agree very much with what Tony said, which is good partners provide choices. Smart partners take some of those choices. But sometimes there will be choices on which you say, well, I think I’ll pass up on that one. MODERATOR: It’s a very good point, which brings me to the BRICS and the rise of middle powers, because that is one of the shifts that we see today. To what extent do you think that that is a challenge to the West, or maybe that can be sort of the bridge, especially in a world where we will see continued competition between the U.S. and China? And I’m going to ask Minister Jaishankar first and – but I’d love for both of you to comment as well. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Yeah, I thought maybe the BRICS one you wanted the U.S. to — SECRETARY BLINKEN: After you, Jai, please. (Laughter.) FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: But look, again, I think it’s important to go back to how it began. The BRICS started in an era where Western dominance was very strong. The premier gathering of the world was the G7, and you had a number of significant powers in the world who felt that, well, they were not part of the G7 but maybe they also brought value to the table by sitting and discussing with others. So in a sense you had a collection of these countries. It was originally four; South Africa joined later. And if you look at it, it’s a very interesting group because it’s geographically as disparate as it can be. Yet it is bound by the fact that these discussions we’ve had over a decade and a half have been very useful for all of us. Now, like any product, you test it in the market at some point. We tested it last year and asked people, so how many of you want to join BRICS? And we got almost 30 countries who were willing to join BRICS. So clearly, if 30 countries saw value in it, there must be something good we have done. So I think it’s important today to make a distinction between being non-West and anti-West. I would certainly characterize India as a country which is non-West, but which has an extremely strong relationship with Western countries getting better by the day. Not everybody else necessarily in that grouping might qualify for that description. But the contribution the BRICS has made – if one looks at the G7 and how it evolved into the G20, I think in a way those additional 13 members who came into this bigger grouping, five of them are BRICS members. The fact that there was another group which was meeting regularly and discussing and debating I think certainly was an input into the expansion of the G7 into the G20. So I think we did a service to the world. MODERATOR: Yeah. Secretary Blinken? SECRETARY BLINKEN: I’m tempted to say what my friend said and leave it at that. Look, the – what we don’t need to do and what we’re not doing is trying to somehow design the world into rigid blocks. Each and every one of the issues that we have to deal with, and deal with in the interests of the American people, may have different collections and coalitions of countries that are focused on it, that bring certain experiences, certain capacities, and I think about it as variable geometry. We’re putting together a puzzle with collections of countries, and not just countries, organizations of different sizes and different shapes to deal with a given problem. As Jai said, we have – and of course the fact that the relationship between our countries, I would argue, is the strongest it’s ever been, it makes no difference that India happens to be a leading member of BRICS. We’re a leading member of the G7. We have the G20 and we have a multiplicity of things that we’re doing together every single day in different ways of organizing ourselves. India and the United States working together in AUKUS, working together – I mean, excuse me, in the Quad, working together in a variety of other fora. All of this goes to the point that the complexity and the multiplicity of the challenges that we have demands that we find different ways to work together, and this shouldn’t be done on an exclusive basis. Look, our default, of course, is to work in the first instance with fellow democracies. That’s only normal and natural. But we are not only willing, we are actively working with any country that wants to solve a particular problem and wants to do so within the context of a rules-based order. That’s the way we approach things. MODERATOR: Speaking of a rule-based order, major powers today are criticized for sort of upholding the rule-based order and upholding values in certain areas but not in others, and a lot of people around the world – and particularly in the Global South but I would say not only in the Global South; even within our Western democracies – are confused. They look at what’s happening in Gaza and at the intensity of the killing, and they ask: Where are human rights? Where are these Western values? I’m sure you’re having here today and yesterday a lot of similar discussions, Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Yes, and they are so productive because many of them are not only speed dating, but behind closed doors, very trustfully. And I think the most important job for those who believe in a rules-based international order, be it politicians, be it journalists, be it citizens, is to not be pushed into this speed dating, into this black-and-white world in all of our bubbles. Because easily – and this is a double-standard question, yeah – if you only look – and you mentioned the situation in Gaza. If I only see the whole time on YouTube what’s happening in Gaza, and I do that every second day – every day I cannot stand it because otherwise I couldn’t get out of my bed anymore – yeah, your reality is obviously – the only thing what we can and have to do right now is to go in a total ceasefire to rescue these innocent children dying there every day. Yeah? So, and you’re 100 percent right by that. But the question is to really come to this reality is to force myself – not myself, but all these persons who are saying this is the moral right thing to do – to then also ask: So how do we come to that? And this is then when some might ask: So why you, German foreign minister, didn’t call for immediate ceasefire the last – months ago? Because I also looked at the other side, at the other YouTube videos, at the other bubbles, yeah, where we saw, I saw for days after the 7th of October – I didn’t only see it, I spoke to the father whose wife and two little girls had been kidnapped by terrorists from Hamas. I saw the video where women have been not only raped, but murdered afterwards. And in that moment for me it was clear, again, that we can also not only relate to the past saying, okay, we know how negotiations about – with terrorists are working. Because if you saw that video and if you were ready to see this woman suffering there, you understand that this is not only a military logic. Because those people who are doing this, raping a woman and killing her afterwards, they don’t want to exchange soldiers for political prisoners. They enjoy slaughtering women. I’m saying that because I think this is really important, bringing it down to the people. Because then you understand in this kind of situation, how do we come now to a ceasefire? That the release of hostages, the release of these women is crucial because otherwise we can never save the children in Gaza. So this comes all back to what my dear colleague Jaishankar has said. If we are not capable of stepping out of right or wrong, yes or no, black or white, we will in this world of dilemmas never do what our job – I would say the three of us here – is: to do all the best to rescue people. And this is why we have been working so intensively for those partners, Arab partners, in the last three months to see how we can come together for the most important point right now: freeing the hostages, having a humanitarian pause to bring in humanitarian support into Gaza, and not stopping even though the headlines are there every day: You cannot fix it anyhow. I think the biggest favor for those who do not care for human rights and the international order is that we are giving up and that we are not being ready to look at these different topics from our different side. And this is why – at least for me; I would say for all the three of us – use our competences, use our channels we are having. And there again diversity is beneficial. If we are not all the same, but if we are trying to solve this horrible war in the Middle East from our different perspectives, then we can also bring security both for the people in Israel and the people in Gaza. SECRETARY BLINKEN: I have to say I fully subscribe – (applause) – fully subscribe to everything that Annalena said. And I think as people in positions, for a brief period of time, of responsibility, but also, and maybe foremost, as human beings – as mothers, fathers, children, brothers, and sisters – we’re intensely driven to try to prevent or stop human suffering, including the suffering of men, women, and children in Gaza. The question is how to do it most effectively and how to take account of the incredible complexity that Annalena just outlined so well. But there’s another element to this that we have a responsibility to do something about. The greatest poison in our common well is dehumanization. And we see that in all directions. And if you lose sight of the humanity of someone else, then your heart is hardened to a point where anything is acceptable and anything is possible. Part of our responsibility is to do what we can to push back, to avoid, to call out dehumanization wherever it’s coming from, in whatever direction. Because if we can’t get at that, it’s very hard, if not impossible, to do other things. MODERATOR: One other criticism that I think I’m sure you hear a lot is U.S. policy has, of course, shifted in the last couple of months, but yet you want the fighting to stop, but there is no sign whatsoever that you’re not willing to send weapons to Israel, for example. So that also confuses people. When they look at the rhetoric versus the action, what would you say to that? SECRETARY BLINKEN: Well, first, we’re committed to Israel’s security. That’s been clear from day one. It remains clear. And we understand and support the proposition that Israel has to find ways to make sure that what happened on October 7th never happens again. (Applause.) So we start there. But we’ve also said – and not only said, we’ve acted on the proposition – that, of course, the way Israel does that matters profoundly. The way it does it in terms of trying to ensure greater protection for civilians who are caught in a crossfire of Hamas’s making. That’s absolutely essential. Making sure that people in need get the assistance they need. We are working on this every single day. And as we’ve seen this evolve over the last four months, things have happened as a result of our engagement, our intervention, that I would say probably would not have happened, almost certainly wouldn’t have happened without it. But it’s not enough; it’s insufficient. And that’s why we’re at it almost, literally, 24 hours a day. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: May I add one thing on that? MODERATOR: What is – yes, sure. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Because for the full picture – and this is what we are discussing, and this is a good thing. In these horrible times, I’m always trying to see the glimpse of hope at the horizon. The good thing is that over the last three months, yeah, all these discussions were helpful in a way. First we didn’t have any humanitarian support; now we have at least a few trucks – not enough trucks. But also from the other understanding – and this is why I totally agree with the security guarantees for Israel – you cannot just say we need a ceasefire and the Israeli government, the IDF has to stop, and then we just wait and see what happens through the regrouping of Hamas. No, we have to give an answer to both legitimate security concerns. So our part of discussion is, for example, in the north, yeah? If people go back to the north, how do we as an international community secure that Hamas is not regrouping there, using, misusing against civilians as human protection shield? And this is also part of our common international security response. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Minister Jaishankar, what is the view from India? What would you – if you had some advice for your colleagues, what would you be – what would you tell them? FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: Well, I don’t have advice for my colleagues, though I – particularly, I think all of us follow the enormous efforts which Tony is putting in right now. But look, the way we look at it, there are different dimensions, different elements to this. Number one, we must be clear that what happened on October 7th was terrorism. No caveats, no justification, no explanation. It was terrorism. Number two, as Israel responds, it is important that Israel should be – should have been very mindful of civilian casualties, that it has an obligation to observe international humanitarian law. Number three, the return of hostages is today imperative. Number four, there is a need for a humanitarian corridor, a sustainable humanitarian corridor to provide relief. And eventually, there has to be a permanent fix, a long-term fix, otherwise we’re going to see a recurrence. And I think today, suddenly – India has long believed in a two-state solution; we have maintained that position for many decades. And I think today, many more countries in the world today feel not just that a two-state solution is necessary, but it is more urgent than it was before. MODERATOR: Let me take a couple of questions. I think there is a gentleman there, and then there and there. Okay, three. Let’s take – let’s take all three questions. Actually, we’ll take four questions very quickly. PARTICIPANT: Four is here? MODERATOR: Yes, four is there. QUESTION: Nathalie Tocci, Rome. A question – in fact, both to Secretary Blinken and to Foreign Minister Baerbock. I mean, the logic of the argument of being somewhat reticent on pushing for a ceasefire, as far as I understand, is basically that of saying, well, one needs to make sure that what happened on the 7th of October does not happen again. And so the question that I ask you is, do you think that what is happening now, what has happened over the last four months, will actually reduce the chances of what happened on the 7th of October happening again? Will it actually make Israel more secure or not? MODERATOR: Okay, so there is — FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: And I (inaudible). MODERATOR: Okay, so I thought that question was that side, but okay. QUESTION: Okay, thank you very much. Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of the parliament of Ukraine. Secretary Blinken, you said those who are not at the table are in the menu. Ukraine was at the table in Budapest when we voluntarily gave up our nuclear weaponry. Now we are in the menu. So the question is, what is the way for us? We are confronted with a nuclear power. Either we will become a member of NATO Alliance with a nuclear power or we should restore our nuclear status. I don’t see any other option. What option do you prefer and what you will answer on this? Thank you very much. MODERATOR: Okay. There’s a question here, question there, and then we’ll do one round. Would that be okay? PARTICIPANT: Do you want me to get — MODERATOR: Yes, I mean, I have said – yeah, here we go. QUESTION: Thank you. My name is Shafik Gabr, from Egypt. My question is to Secretary Blinken. You’ve invested an incredible amount of time trying to bring a settlement in the issue of Gaza, and at the very same time we all feel in the region that things can spill over in a very dramatic way. Especially, there are many excuses of why not to have a solution, but to do things step by step. That is not going to work. So my question to you is, sir, why, with all the countries, including the United States, including the UK, just what Cameron has just said, proclaiming a two-state solution is not something the United States puts on the floor now and be able to achieve that? MODERATOR: Okay, thank you. Thank you. Finally, there’s a question there, and then I’m afraid — QUESTION: I have a loud voice; I don’t need a microphone. Hello, my name is Masih Alinejad. I’m an Iranian troublemaker for mullahs, and I have a simple question. We cannot talk about global security by forgetting about Iran, by burying the human rights abuses under the carpet. I am here today with a woman who was in the front line of last year’s uprising. She was shot in her eye; she lost her eyes because of the Revolutionary Guards. So my question is very clear: How we can reach to peace and security in the world without designating the Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization, which the United States of America did that – thanks – but why the allies are not following the United States? The democratic countries are not as united as autocracy, because Islamic Republic is helping Putin, is helping Hamas, all the proxies in Yemen. So as we see, unfortunately, dictators are more united than democratic countries. Do you have any common strategy to isolate Islamic Repulbic and address Khamenei and his gang of killers the way that you address Putin? Thank you so much. MODERATOR: Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.) All three of you, you can pick the question you want to answer. I know one was directed – a couple were directed at Secretary Blinken. So maybe — SECRETARY BLINKEN: Want me to start? MODERATOR: Maybe you start. Yeah. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good. So to the question, is Israel more secure now after – four months after October 7th, I think the answer is, in the near term, in the immediate, yes it is, in terms of dealing with the immediate threat, the horrific terrorist group that attacked it in the most unimaginable ways on October 7th. Is it more secure for the long term? That’s a different question. Because the fundamental question we have to ask ourselves is – and Jai mentioned this – how do we make sure that the cycle one way or another doesn’t repeat itself, whether it’s a year from now, five years from now, or 10 years from now? I think there’s an extraordinary opportunity before Israel in the months ahead to actually once and for all end that cycle. And it’s because there are some new facts that didn’t exist before when there were efforts to make peace between Israelis and Palestinians, starting with the fact that virtually every Arab country now genuinely wants to integrate Israel into the region, to normalize relations if they haven’t already done so, to provide security assurances and commitments so that Israel can feel more safe and more secure. At the same time, there are genuine efforts underway led by Arab countries to reform, revitalize, revamp the Palestinian Authority so that it can be more effective in representing the interests of the Palestinian people and could be a better partner for Israel in that future. And there’s also, I think, the imperative that Jai mentioned that’s more urgent than ever: to proceed to a Palestinian state, one that also ensures the security of Israel and makes the necessary commitments to do so. If you put all of that together, you have an integrated region where people are actually working together for the common good, a region in which Israel is secure in ways that it’s never been before, and where the number one threat to its security as well as the security of many of us – just alluded to in the last question, Iran – is isolated along with all of its proxies. That future, that path is there, it’s clear, it’s hard, it’s complicated, but it’s real. The alternative is an endless repetition of the cycle that we’ve seen year after year, decade after decade, generation after generation. It’s incumbent upon all of us who have relationships with and responsibility for different countries in the region, things that we bring to the table ourselves, to make the hard decisions, do the difficult things to actually make that path clear, real, and one that – whose attraction is overwhelmingly powerful. I think the more we’re able to do that and the more we distinguish between that path and the alternative, the greater the chance we’ll actually see movement in that direction. I’ll say just very quickly on Ukraine, I think you’ve heard throughout this conference, including by the fact that we have an extraordinary delegation from the United States Congress here – Republicans, Democrats, Senate, House – that there is enduring support for Ukraine, and that’s not just from the United States, it’s from country after country in Europe and well beyond, for a whole variety of reasons, starting of course with the aggression that the Ukrainians have suffered, but also because that aggression has gone to the very principles at the heart of the international system that each of us has a stake in preserving, and that’s not going away. So there’s a tremendous determination on the part of dozens of countries to do two things. First, to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs to deal in the immediate with the ongoing Russian aggression; but second, to put Ukraine on a path where increasingly in the months and years to come it’s able to stand strongly on its own two feet militarily, economically, and democratically. That is the strongest possible rebuke to Putin. It’s the strongest possible rebuke to all those who would seek to undermine Ukraine. And I’ll just conclude with this: The real lesson to be drawn from what we’ve seen – including, as you rightly said, Russia tearing up and then spitting on the Budapest Memorandum, among many, many other agreements – is that this aggression against Ukraine has been an absolute strategic debacle for Vladimir Putin and for Russia. Russia is weaker militarily, it’s weaker economically, it’s weaker diplomatically. Europe has ended its energy dependence on Russia in the space of two years. Ukrainians are more united than they’ve ever been, including against Russia, which was not the case certainly in 2014 – not desirable, but it’s the result of Russia’s actions – and certainly since 2022. We have the NATO Alliance, a defensive Alliance with no intent of ever attacking Russia, only there to defend its members, that is now stronger and larger. All of this a result of actions that Russia has taken, precipitating the very things it said it wanted to prevent. So I think as those lessons are digested, not to mention the horrific losses that Russia has suffered as a result of Vladimir Putin throwing its young men into a meatgrinder of his own making, I think the more those lessons are digested, the more you’re going to see that this is not repeated. But that requires all of us to maintain the solidarity that we’ve demonstrated with Ukraine, a solidarity that is important not just for Ukraine, but for all of us. The stakes couldn’t be higher. So my belief, again, listening to everyone here over the last couple of days, talking to our members of Congress who are with us, is that not only is that support there, it will be sustained, and Ukraine will succeed. MODERATOR: Thank you, Secretary. Minister Baerbock. FOREIGN MINISTER BAERBOCK: Well, I guess the question from Iran was for us. So the question was, why do you not follow the example and list them as terrorists, in a terrorist sanction regime, the Revolutionary Guard? We have discussed it quite often, but the quick answer is because I’m defending rule of law, trying without any double standards. And our legal situation in the European Union – and you can like it or not, but this is how – in which context we are working – in our European legal system, we have a sanction system for listing under terrorism if terrorism occurs in another country, especially in the European Union. It was after the attacks on the U.S. on the 9th of September. So we need a legal ground to list them. So far, we do not have the evidence and proof that there have been these terrorist attacks in the European Union. There were different cases. It’s a different legal system in the U.S. But – and this is important for me because I hear this argument again and again – this is not because we shy away with regard to the Revolutionary Guard or the crimes against women, youth, civil society, its own population. No. We use the instruments we are having as a European Union to defend human rights. And we set up for the first time in history of the European Union a sanction systems because of human rights violation. And for me this is even stronger. In the past, it was the same with Daesh and the crimes against Yezidi women, yeah? They have been brought to court not slaughtering women, not saying these are the worst sexual violence crimes you commit, but under terrorism. I think this is wrong. We have to name the crimes, and the crime is targeted directly to women, directly to human rights. We say we sanction you because of what you have done to you shooting in your eyes, killing your friends, killing your sisters. And it’s the same effect. And this it comes all down to me – for me, politics, it’s not about symbolic action. It’s about what matters for the people. And under the sanction system, human rights sanctions from the EU, Revolutionary Guard – we named them – cannot enter the European Union. We have frozen their assets. So the result is exactly the same what the U.S. has done under the terrorist sanction system. So if you’re asking, do we act as a result in the same way? Yes, we do, but we call it human rights sanction system because these are the worst human rights violations you can see. And this comes also back to the other question about symbolic politics or what matters in reality. We would have been at a total different stage if, after the 7th of October – this was a question from Italy – after the 7th of October, we could have had a common resolution. We were in Cairo at the so-called peace summit together with different countries, many Arab partners, and also from the European Union. We tried to fix a text where we would say, okay, after these horrible crimes of the 7th of October, there could be the momentum now for whatever generations have dreamt of: a two-state solution pathway. But in order to do that, we have to guarantee that the 7th of October never happens again to Israel and we have to guarantee that Palestinians have the security to live in peace and security for them. Unfortunately, those meeting there together, not everybody was ready to name the 7th of October what it was: a terrorist attack from Hamas on Israeli people. And this is why we passed this momentum. I regret it, but this is how life is. So now again we have to work again if we now, after four months where we see that the current situation only brings misery for everybody, if we can regroup again. And this is why what we have described before, for us it’s so important to work together as European Union, as the U.S., with Arab partners to find what we need: guarantees that Israelis can live forever in security; that the 7th of October can never happen again; and the same counts for Palestinian people – it has to be an irreversible path towards a two-state solution. And this is our job which we have to do right now, and we can only do it together with the different partners. Neither the U.S., definitely not Germany, but also not one Arab country alone can go this path. We have to group and unite together for the peace in the Middle East. (Applause.) MODERATOR: Inshallah, as they would say in the Middle East. One — FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: So I’ll just take a minute. MODERATOR: One minute, yes. FOREIGN MINISTER JAISHANKAR: I think a very large number of countries, especially of the Global South, believe that terrorism shouldn’t be countenanced or justified. But they equally strongly believe that a two-state solution should not be delayed. These are not choices. These are both musts. And unless we are able to address both these issues, we are not going to really solve the problem. MODERATOR: Well, thank you all. I know that we’ve gone over time, so apologies for that. And thank you to the audience. (Applause.) |
| Escalation of Hostilities in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 02/17/2024 |
02/17/2024 05:57 PM EST Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson The United States strongly condemns the worsening violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) caused by the actions of the Rwanda-backed, U.S.- and UN-sanctioned M23 armed group, including its recent incursions into the town of Sake. This escalation has increased the risk to millions of people already exposed to human rights abuses including displacement, deprivation, and attacks. We call on M23 to immediately cease hostilities and withdraw from its current positions around Sake and Goma, in accordance with the Luanda and Nairobi processes. The United States condemns Rwanda’s support for the M23 armed group and calls on Rwanda to immediately withdraw all Rwanda Defense Force personnel from the DRC and remove its surface-to-air missile systems, which threaten the lives of civilians, UN and other regional peacekeepers, humanitarian actors, and commercial flights in eastern DRC. It is essential that all states respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and hold accountable all actors for human rights abuses in the conflict in eastern DRC. We call on the government of the DRC to continue to support confidence building measures, including ceasing cooperation with the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), an armed group named as a “negative force” by regional bodies and the government of the DRC, and which exposes the civilian population to risk. We continue to support regional diplomatic efforts that promote de-escalation and create the conditions for lasting peace in DRC and we call on all sides to participate constructively in reaching a negotiated solution. |
