FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT(Credit: Eric Frommelt) Have economists done too much inquiring “into” mathematical theories at the expense of inquiring “with” them? In F&D magazine, Niall Kishtainy traces political economy’s 200-year evolution into economic science. Adam Smith is often considered the father of modern economics, but contemporary economists’ modeling and mathematics toolbox has little in common with Smith’s literary, humanistic methods, he writes. “Good economics must strike the right balance between models as objects fascinating in themselves and as instruments to peer into the chaos of economic reality.” This article appeared in F&D’s March issue. We invited leading thinkers to share their views on how economics can rise to today’s challenges. Contributors include Angus Deaton, Atif Mian, Diane Coyle, Jayati Ghosh, John H. Cochrane, Michael Kremer, Dani Rodrik, Jeffry Frieden, Kate Raworth, Katharina Pistor, Michael Olabisi, Niall Kishtainy, Signe Krogstrup, Suresh Naidu, Ulrike Malmendier, Wendy Carlin, and many others. |